So, war is allowed unless it ruins peoples enjoyment?

Basically...Its like the super weapon rule...if someone creates an uber weapon that no one can defend against the game isn't fun....its just one person being a jerk....

Hehehehehe..hehehe. :rolleyes:

 

 

 

 

Remember the anthrax with Stratos Jets and the FOABs? That didn't work out for anyone.

If you attacked them it doesn't count? I've been killed many times in every game I've played, I generally don't hold grudges. Unless the player blatantly breaks rules or cheats. Technically, for the rules of this game (not the forum itself, though...), you haven't done anything that I would really hold a grudge against you for (except for the Ross thing). However, you can be a bit annoying sometimes*. But, my vote doesn't count, so I'm just stating my opinion.

 

* Not really your fault, but you know that sorcerer in Dungeoneering you found? And killed? And... ate the brains of? He was a major plot device character trying to find Grim, to lead him around the world as a traveling companion, looking for great and powerful magical artifacts. With that guy on his side, the White Elm Staff incident wouldn't have happened (probably not the whole golem issue either) and we would've averted the in-game apocalypse that Retech is making a campaign for. Just sayin'!

Lol, and Ross's uber god mod army of drones.

Either way, you can't have the hegemony without a competeative element.

True, the only thing that pisses me off about Hex is the way he is spending non existant money on a non existsnt 2 million man army.

Lol, and Ross's uber god mod army of drones.

Either way, you can't have the hegemony without a competeative element.

 

True, but there is quite a wide line between competition and overpowered.

If people think you have done something which is not in the spirit of the game...IE not giving someone a fighting chance... then it sort of makes the game a bore to play.

Lol, and Ross's uber god mod army of drones.

Either way, you can't have the hegemony without a competeative element.

 

True, but there is quite a wide line between competition and overpowered.

If people think you have done something which is not in the spirit of the game...IE not giving someone a fighting chance... then it sort of makes the game a bore to play.

Well, no-ones new now so I can't Zerg Rush.

Well you can still zerg with a load of soldiers :P

Well you can still zerg with a load of soldiers :P

Naked soldiers using rocks tied to sticks as weapons.

 

Army maintainance still costs, y'know.

Which he seemingly keeps ignoring.

 

I agree Hex should be allowed to attack, but its his funds that I vote should get him kicked off. He has been spending non existant money.

Hex getting booted because people agree that he is screwing up the game...Thats why there is a vote....So people can decide if he is just playing the game or if he is ruining the game...

More people voted for Yes/I don't care than No so he should be banned.

Don't care means you don't care...it doesn't mean you support or don't support it....

More individuals voted for Yes than I Don't Care or No. You can't group the neutral with the defenders. That's like Switzerland deciding to assist the Taliban against the U.S.

If he continues to irritate people then he may well be forcibly banned from the game... just putting that out here (seriously hex why in the hell did you attack mather?)

That's not how it works.

 

Apparently, it is.

 

I foresaw this coming and asked Archi to remove the last option for fear that it would cause confusion. However, the fact remains that most people want Hex gone, for one reason or another...

Grim its not about the attack, its about how he irritates people.

 

If this is related to the attack than this vote I must say is like everyone saying "Hitler should be removed from existance cause he attacked Poland".

 

No instead what really happens is that you actually beat Germany, instead of crying like a female dog and whining he should be removed.

 

Though Archi just wants whats best for the players of the game and thus why the vote was called.

How many people tried to assassinate Hitler, how many governments ordered the attempts? I think this is both a good example and completely irrelevant.

Icu, at the point where he attacked me, I literally had no army.

 

There was no way I could win, since he attacked me like, 5 days after the game started.

 

Plus, the hitler analogy was really, really bad. If there really was a vote for if Hitler should have been banned from real life, I'm pretty sure it would probably have the same results as this poll (At the time, anyway).

I don't think we can really compare Hex and Hitler....

Though Archi just wants whats best for the players of the game and thus why the vote was called.

No it's because Sere and Ross and [bleep]ing and moaning.

 

Edif: the hitler examples great, how about Sere instead of asking god (metaphoric) to remove me from existance do it yourself.

Many more. Germany would have had a smaller percentage of the vote, considering it's enemies. Even Germany's allies in WWII hated Hitler, and would have stabbed him in the back if he lost his usefulness and power.

 

SERE IS MORE OR LESS ON YOUR SIDE SMART ONE. Not against you at least. Of course, seeing as you want to change that...

Indeed. Bad analogy is bad.

Really? Such similar events have happened.

 

Except Hex isn't exactly going after a master race, but he has a God complex.

 

Also they're both dictators. So it's not an amazingly bad analogy.