i see everyone make oak larders to make good exp. my problem is I don't know what the word larders means so I don't know where in my house or how to make larders. can someone plz help :oops:

Larders are built in the Kitchen in your P.O.H.

You can make Normal Larders, Oak Larders and Teak Larders. :smile:

 

You need 33 Construction to build Oak Larders; with 8 Oak Planks, along with a hammer and saw.

Larders are built in the Kitchen in your P.O.H.

You can make Normal Larders, Oak Larders and Teak Larders. :smile:

 

You need 33 Construction to build Oak Larders; with 8 Oak Planks, along with a hammer and saw.

 

thanks :thumbsup:

You could of you know googled "runescape larder" to find out.

 

Or even more shockingly looked the word up in a dictionary, its amazing how many words have their meanings explained in a dictionary - the format dedicated to cataloguing words and their meanings

You could of you know googled "runescape larder" to find out.

 

Or even more shockingly looked the word up in a dictionary, its amazing how many words have their meanings explained in a dictionary - the format dedicated to cataloguing words and their meanings

 

 

I find it still amazing that folks just can't give advise without criticizing someone on not thinking of the obvious,it was a simple question and no need to make the OP feel inadequate,for someone with lots of posts I'm surprised by your comments lately.

 

back OT,Construction,Kitchen

You could of you know googled "runescape larder" to find out.

 

Or even more shockingly looked the word up in a dictionary, its amazing how many words have their meanings explained in a dictionary - the format dedicated to cataloguing words and their meanings

 

 

I find it still amazing that folks just can't give advise without criticizing someone on not thinking of the obvious,it was a simple question and no need to make the OP feel inadequate,for someone with lots of posts I'm surprised by your comments lately.

 

back OT,Construction,Kitchen

 

Since when is telling people simple and basic ways to solve there own problems and thus better equipping them for future issues not a good thing?

 

That's the problem with half you newer people you get on your high horses about people "criticising" when we opt to give people the tools to solve their own problem instead of just an answer.

Sure if it hasn't been answered a straight answer is a good move, but in the long run giving people methods of self problem solving is much better.

As they say :

Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.

 

In this sense:

Answer the question that the user can find the answer for easily, you've solved 1 problem. Show them how to find the answer themselves easily, you've solved hundreds of potential simple problems they would of come upon and posted asking about.

C'mon Paw, you can tell that it's an implication as to the tone of your comments on using a Dictionary. It's all fair and well, even preferred to give a solution which allows later use but making people feel inadequate alongside it isn't so great. ;)

People always put tone in that isn't there because you can't read tone in mere words.

 

I was simply explaining what a dictionary was given that the OP is from Norway and based on the wording of his original post and his failure to know what a larder is he doesn't have a huge grasp of english beyond the basics and therefore could possibly not understand what a dictionary is and therefore why it would be a useful tool.

People always put tone in that isn't there because you can't read tone in mere words.

 

I was simply explaining what a dictionary was given that the OP is from Norway and based on the wording of his original post and his failure to know what a larder is he doesn't have a huge grasp of english beyond the basics and therefore could possibly not understand what a dictionary is and therefore why it would be a useful tool.

 

Or even more shockingly looked the word up in a dictionary, its amazing how many words have their meanings explained in a dictionary - the format dedicated to cataloguing words and their meanings

 

Yea I'm sure you didn't imply anything by that and was just explaining what a dictionary was...

you are aware that building oak dungeon doors is faster than larders right? 10 oak planks, in your first dungeon room. :)

you are aware that building oak dungeon doors is faster than larders right? 10 oak planks, in your first dungeon room. :)

 

Unless he's changed his name without updating it on here, he doesn't even have the level required for oak larders, never mind oak doors. :wall:

In case you're still wondering what a larder is, it's a cool place to store food, like a refrigerator but before those were invented.

You could have, you know, googled "runescape larder" to find out.

 

Or even more shockingly looked the word up in a dictionary, it's amazing how many words have their meanings explained in a dictionary - the format dedicated to cataloguing words and their meanings.

 

I corrected all your punctuation errors in red.

 

I italicized the incorrect definition.

 

Also, here are a few definitions for the word dictionary.

 

Noah Webster says:

 

"A book containing the words of a language arranged in alphabetical order, with explanations of their meanings; a lexicon"

 

Dictionary.com says:

 

"A book containing a selection of the words of a language, usually arranged alphabetically, giving information about their meanings, pronunciations, etymologies, inflected forms, etc., expressed in either the same or another language; lexicon; glossary"

 

 

I highly suggest you obtain one of these usuful books. You will learn quite a bit of information that you currently do not know.

I lol'd, Pere.

Thanks. I simply could not resist. :)

Shouldn't "of" be "have" pere?

Good catch, I think it depends on where you are from, but have is technically correct.

Yep, 'have' would be correct.

Good catch, I think it depends on where you are from, but have is technically correct.

 

 

Well if we're all going to be the grammar police here, then he should have spelled "cataloguing" as "cataloging" and there should be a period before the "it's."

Good catch, I think it depends on where you are from, but have is technically correct.

 

 

Well if we're all going to be the grammar police here, then he should have spelled "cataloguing" as "cataloging" and there should be a period before the "it's."

Both "cataloguing" and "cataloging" are correct.