The Day Runescape Went Crazy! UPDATED!!! CHAPTER SEVEN!

[Rilha]

Hail, friends and strangers alike!

 

 

 

Being that my story became quite popular on a well-known fanfiction site, I decided to post it here to see what the reactions are. This, as should be fairly clear from the name, is a humour story about Runescape.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, I know that there are inaccuracies in it, I'm working on ironing out anything flawed. I created the first chapter in March of 2005, so the plot wasn't nearly as advanced.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yami Rebecca is my real username, if you want to bug me. However, my friends are made up, because I don't think my real friends would appreciate people messaging them to annoy them about the story... And I do sing while collecting things. It gets so boringÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬ÃâæDx

 

 

 

Alas is the closest thing to a swearword that I use while playing the gameÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâæ

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And IÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢d like to thank several people for ideas. You know who you are, I wonÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢t mention your usernamesÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâæ

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anyways, on with the story!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHAPTER ONE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I took a big breath of the simulated air. It was a nice day in Runescape. It was always a nice day in Runescape. Why didnÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢t Runescape have any weatherÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâæ? I decided that IÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢d have to bug one of the gods about that. I clobbered a Lesser Demon on the head with my scimitar. He didnÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢t like it. He clobbered me back, and hit a 7. I clicked on my inventory. Alas - I was out of pizza. I finished off the demon, and aimed for the exit. I went to the nearest bank - in Falador. I talked to the banker, who opened my bank account for me. I only had 2 pizzas left. I sighed. I obviously wouldnÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢t be back to trouncing the demons anytime soon. I wandered down to AggieÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢s hut. I waddled between the tables, collecting cheese and tomatoes, while singing the Inuyasha theme song ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦Ã¢â¬ÅEvery HeartÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬ÃâÃ

[sirith_knight]

Lol, that was funny. You just introduce characters and throw 'em away forever. I like how you show how stupid some of the things in RS are, and how the characters know someone is reading it. I haven't played RS in a loong while so i don't know much about the cat Bob. From what i have gathered reading stories and such he is really Zaros. Anyway, it made me laugh, good job.

[Rilha]

Yay, you reviewed! -happyhappyhappyhappyhappyhappyhappy-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No, Zaros isn't Bob, but they released that information long after I had written most of the chapters.

[0mg_kill_me]

lol u drinked to much beers m8?

[jaklumen]

I skimmed through a lot of this, but it looks good.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you were using paragraphs, it might be easier to read.

[archimage_a]

I love storys that are mostly one line naration/description.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I Also like that you adress the audience and are rooted in the fact that the characters know that they are in the story yet refuse to admit it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It seems to be a good story, reminisent of one of my own.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I think you need to rename it though because it was not one day or in fact, anything like a crash.

[yang_x_ying]

Good story, well written and funny. I look forward to upcoming chapters

[dragoncmd]

I love it except for your one major error. Runescape can't go crazy, Runescape IS crazy (or as I like to say, world of Warcraft gone bad).

[Munpie]

ingenious :D. though the sudden turn to agression with the impaling suprised me :?

[Rilha]

I skimmed through a lot of this, but it looks good.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you were using paragraphs, it might be easier to read.

 

 

 

I did use paragraphs, but the forums didn't like them.

[Rilha]

ingenious :D. though the sudden turn to agression with the impaling suprised me :?

 

 

 

I had been typing too long, so I was cranky. 8)

[willyx]

LOL, hilarious!!! But i don't understand the "Nonexistence lacks the qualities it would require to exist; to exist, it would have to not exist, thus negating its existence. Therefore, something must exist; something infinite, with infinite possibilities."

[archimage_a]

LOL, hilarious!!! But i don't understand the "Nonexistence lacks the qualities it would require to exist; to exist, it would have to not exist, thus negating its existence. Therefore, something must exist; something infinite, with infinite possibilities."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-existance is: something that does not exist(Defintion) there for it does not exist thus making it exist as there is no explaination for something that does not exist because it can not exist.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And there for if Non-Existance negates its self then the opposite, which must exist because Non-Existance does exist even though it does not, Would be the opposite to nothing which is everything which is infinity there for proving that Infinity does exist and there for a 'Something' Exists that is Infinite with an Infinite amount of possiblilites, because there is something with absoultely Zero possiblites.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is because everything has an Equal and Opposite reaction so there for nothing is the inverse of Everything so they must exist if the other exists, but if one exists and the other does not then neither actually exist there for proving that they do.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also it is impossible to disprove a negitive.

 

 

 

Can you prove you are not a robot? But how would you know you could be a robot running an experiment that is investigating the art of disproving a negitive and therefore will not be aware of being a robot and therefore not be able to tell if you are a robot or not.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sorry for this off-topic post but it needed to be explained(Although I am aware this has most likely just confused you futher)

[Rilha]

 

LOL, hilarious!!! But i don't understand the "Nonexistence lacks the qualities it would require to exist; to exist, it would have to not exist, thus negating its existence. Therefore, something must exist; something infinite, with infinite possibilities."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-existance is: something that does not exist(Defintion) there for it does not exist thus making it exist as there is no explaination for something that does not exist because it can not exist.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And there for if Non-Existance negates its self then the opposite, which must exist because Non-Existance does exist even though it does not, Would be the opposite to nothing which is everything which is infinity there for proving that Infinity does exist and there for a 'Something' Exists that is Infinite with an Infinite amount of possiblilites, because there is something with absoultely Zero possiblites.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is because everything has an Equal and Opposite reaction so there for nothing is the inverse of Everything so they must exist if the other exists, but if one exists and the other does not then neither actually exist there for proving that they do.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also it is impossible to disprove a negitive.

 

 

 

Can you prove you are not a robot? But how would you know you could be a robot running an experiment that is investigating the art of disproving a negitive and therefore will not be aware of being a robot and therefore not be able to tell if you are a robot or not.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sorry for this off-topic post but it needed to be explained(Although I am aware this has most likely just confused you futher)

 

 

 

Yay, you think like me! 'Tis rare indeed to find one who can not only follow my string of logic but expand on it.

[willyhenriksen]

I love the story! keep on writing :)

[glademering]

This is because everything has an Equal and Opposite reaction so there for nothing is the inverse of Everything so they must exist if the other exists, but if one exists and the other does not then neither actually exist there for proving that they do.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All to true in physics... if i punch a brick wall with sufficient force, it will exert an equal and opposite force on my hand, quite possible breaking the bones. This is NOT the same equal and opposite reaction that will occur if I punch my brother in the face. That is a reaction, but it has absolutely nothing to do with newonian physics.... and as for this non-existence existing... if you take a virtual container, with no substance or mass, and put into it all other empty containers, does the first container contain itself?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The idea of non-existence exists, but the fact that I don't have a sister implies that I do have a sister is absolute garbage. The notion of my not having a sister exists because I don't have one, otherwise that notion would be false. Similarly, if something doesn't exist, then perhaps, and I emphasize that word, the notion of it not existing exists. However, if that were true for all objects in non-existence, then the definition of the word invention would be completely false as all things that did not exist and were invented were actually always there.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So I guess the main bullet point here is that I disagree with your statement.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BTW weird story, but not a bad one

[Rilha]

 

This is because everything has an Equal and Opposite reaction so there for nothing is the inverse of Everything so they must exist if the other exists, but if one exists and the other does not then neither actually exist there for proving that they do.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All to true in physics... if i punch a brick wall with sufficient force, it will exert an equal and opposite force on my hand, quite possible breaking the bones. This is NOT the same equal and opposite reaction that will occur if I punch my brother in the face. That is a reaction, but it has absolutely nothing to do with newonian physics.... and as for this non-existence existing... if you take a virtual container, with no substance or mass, and put into it all other empty containers, does the first container contain itself?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The idea of non-existence exists, but the fact that I don't have a sister implies that I do have a sister is absolute garbage. The notion of my not having a sister exists because I don't have one, otherwise that notion would be false. Similarly, if something doesn't exist, then perhaps, and I emphasize that word, the notion of it not existing exists. However, if that were true for all objects in non-existence, then the definition of the word invention would be completely false as all things that did not exist and were invented were actually always there.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So I guess the main bullet point here is that I disagree with your statement.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BTW weird story, but not a bad one

 

 

 

My original point was that everything has the possibility of existence; Inventions have the possiblity of existence. It's not that they've always been there. I never actually went into the 'equal and opposite reaction' thing when I came up with the original phrase.

 

 

 

Everything has the potential for existence, including nonexistence itself.

 

 

 

But nonexistence can't exist; and thus, it goes on.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It's quite difficult to explain what I mean; it tends to utterly confound most people.

[glademering]

But nonexistence can't exist;

 

 

 

ever heard of a black hole? technically it is something, but it is of infinite mass and has 1/infinite size... so yeah

[Rilha]

 

But nonexistence can't exist;

 

 

 

ever heard of a black hole? technically it is something, but it is of infinite mass and has 1/infinite size... so yeah

 

 

 

It's not infinitely small, it's the size of an atom. Neither is it of infinite mass; its mass is very great indeed, but to say that it's infinitely massive is false.

[Silverchipmunk]

 

 

But nonexistence can't exist;

 

 

 

ever heard of a black hole? technically it is something, but it is of infinite mass and has 1/infinite size... so yeah

 

 

 

It's not infinitely small, it's the size of an atom. Neither is it of infinite mass; its mass is very great indeed, but to say that it's infinitely massive is false.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actually, the "black hole" part of a black hole has no mass. The entire black hole does, but the place where everything goes, the place that makes a black hole a black hole, has no mass. The centre of a black hole is a singularity, which can hold an infinite amount of matter. This is because it has infinite density, though it has no mass. (this is much more complicated than Newtonian physics, it is Steven-Hawkingian physics.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

p.s. Wow this topic has really gone of on a tangent lol :D

[willyhenriksen]

Everything's relative

[Rilha]

 

 

 

But nonexistence can't exist;

 

 

 

ever heard of a black hole? technically it is something, but it is of infinite mass and has 1/infinite size... so yeah

 

 

 

It's not infinitely small, it's the size of an atom. Neither is it of infinite mass; its mass is very great indeed, but to say that it's infinitely massive is false.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actually, the "black hole" part of a black hole has no mass. The entire black hole does, but the place where everything goes, the place that makes a black hole a black hole, has no mass. The centre of a black hole is a singularity, which can hold an infinite amount of matter. This is because it has infinite density, though it has no mass. (this is much more complicated than Newtonian physics, it is Steven-Hawkingian physics.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

p.s. Wow this topic has really gone of on a tangent lol :D

 

 

 

Ah, okay. Thanks for the information. ^^

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anywho, black holes are not what I'm talking about when I say nonexistence. My idea of utter nonexistence, I suppose, is far too abstract to be relayed in so few words.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, this topic has gone off on a tangent; frankly, I am rather surprised

 

 

 

at the intelligence level in these forums. So many people in Runescape are utter idiots that one would expect forums about the game to be filled with morons as well; however, this is clearly not so.

[fryguy19902005]

hey no everyone who plays runescape is not a moron for instanc my intellagance quota is in the genius range an i play runescape so not everyone in rs is a moron you just havent ran into me yet

[Silverchipmunk]

hey no everyone who plays runescape is not a moron for instanc my intellagance quota is in the genius range an i play runescape so not everyone in rs is a moron you just havent ran into me yet

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uh, they didn't say that everyone who plays is a moron. They said that they were suprised how intelligent the people were on the forums. That's not a bad thing, it's a compliment.

[Munpie]

Just wondering.. but will there be more chapters to this story? I quite enjoyed it and would be glad to read more.