I think they lowered monsters agressivity alot. Now most F2P monsters don't attack you unless you're next to them (within 1 square)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It does suck

It only sucks if you're an AFKer.

Wich I am.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I only train non-afk when doing slayer

Nothing wrong with AFK, but you can die easily. Even if your viewing forums while your training thats Afking..

Nothing wrong with AFK, but you can die easily. Even if your viewing forums while your training thats Afking..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Would only loose 200k or so

the aggresivety is based on your lvl, 2 times there lvl + one then they dont attack you anymore

In wild they attack any lvl, very good for afk trianing

yeah but yuo need to watch iff there's no other player arround

actually AFK is not fair against other players. It's not so much macroing, but you arent really working on your skills yourself. I'm 101% against it.

yeah but yuo need to watch iff there's no other player arround

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:lol: Any dommarks here? Once someone tried to kill me when I was afk, and i killed them---AFK! :lol: :lol:

it's nt really macroing because your doing it yourself but you know what ?

 

 

 

when ppl macro by autofighting they might leave behind valuble loot which any other lucky player might come and take it

I think they lowered monsters agressivity alot. Now most F2P monsters don't attack you unless you're next to them (within 1 square)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It does suck

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I am assuming you are P2p...wear a god item other than guthix and stand in the bandit camp. There you go.

Well i think its good for them to be aggresive. Some lightly some hardly.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For example in f2p the moss giants are aggresive at close range. But in the ice caves the warriors will chase from 4 5 maybe even 6 spaces away sometimes more. Balance is the key.

wat dose afk mean/?

Off topic - Peronix, Im loving your sig! Mind if I nick it? Lets get some kind of a revolution going here!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On topic - Who really cares about the aggressivity of f2p monsters? I mean, you are posting this in p2p, indicationg that you are indeed p2p. Hence, there are countless places where you can go to AFK if you so wish. Let the f2p'ers be bothered about f2p monsters.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On the other hand, I have only recently returned to members, and I have been training a lot in f2p. There are still sufficient places to AFK or get yourself attacked in f2p if that is what you are hell bent on doing.

agrresiveness doesnt really matter. You go, you fight, the monster dies. Or you die. either way it doesnt matter whether it goes for you. I think they should be agrresive because you dont want some lvl 3 noob walking right past a dragon thatd just be wrong.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I think ill go play castle wars some more. this is kinda a useless thing to discuss....

I think they should be agrresive because you dont want some lvl 3 noob walking right past a dragon thatd just be wrong.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thats exactly the point he is making. :roll:

wat dose afk mean/?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AFK stands for Away From Keyboard and means that you can read forums, watch tv or do a handstand whilst still training your combat. In order for it to work though it requires the local monsters to be aggressive and attack you for standing near them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monsters stop attacking you when you have double their combat level +1, or when you have been in that area for an extended period of time (usually about 15-20 minutes)

i think we have said everything that needs be said here.

I think they lowered monsters agressivity alot. Now most F2P monsters don't attack you unless you're next to them (within 1 square)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It does suck

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maybe your combat lvl is getting high and you need to be more picky about you training.