February 15, 200620 yr Me and litterly everyone in my school fight about what is the better first person shooter. I say FEAR rocks, but my friend thinks otherwize! So vote I say, vote! Stats: Both games have the best look they can have right now. Call of duty has real war action. FEAR is frighteninly intence and a little...disturbing. But thats what I like in game :D
February 15, 200620 yr From the story department it looks like FEAR wins I just posted something! ^_^ to the terrorist...er... kirbybeam.
February 16, 200620 yr Story + Single player = Fear Decent Story, GREAT online, Good replay value. - COD2 Also i must reccoment Battlefeild 2.. :)
February 16, 200620 yr Story line and game play= FEAR Multiplayer and considered best WWII fps= call of duty2 FEAR can get intense, thats why I like it :) . The scary part makes all games better.
February 16, 200620 yr Aren't they completely different in every way? Ghost: I am prejudice towards ignorance, so that would explain why I appear to be so.
February 16, 200620 yr Preaty much MPC. Imo, COD 2 is just a rehashed sequal of the origonal. It's very short as well. I haven't played FEAR, so I can't comment on that one, but I guess... FEAR wins? Oh well, they are both incredibly different FPS's, one being a horror and one being another WW II FPS....
February 16, 200620 yr Preaty much MPC. Imo, COD 2 is just a rehashed sequal of the origonal. It's very short as well. play it on veteran and beat it like me :) http://live.xbox.com/member/Pink Floyd 08 < -- proof within :)
February 16, 200620 yr Preaty much MPC. Imo, COD 2 is just a rehashed sequal of the origonal. It's very short as well. I haven't played FEAR, so I can't comment on that one, but I guess... FEAR wins? Oh well, they are both incredibly different FPS's, one being a horror and one being another WW II FPS.... Try it on hardest settings. And play COD 2 MP ;).
February 16, 200620 yr Don't belive it would be that hard, although not going out to pay 50$ for it to do so lol.
February 16, 200620 yr Meh, those two really don't have enough in common to make any kind of real comparison. Besides, there's no accounting for taste, so the whole debate seems rather pointless... My Tip.It Times Articles (10 and counting) || The Varrock Library Author Index projectDo you dare to dream? - Part 19 added. || The Hospital (WIP) - New story!Necromagus looks like a viking ... with glasses.
February 16, 200620 yr I'm still trying to beat all the games of the past 7 years or so...I got all the best games of 2004 finished...Many from 2003...And I'm playing so many RPGS...But when I get to the point where I get to 2005, I'm going to probably buy whatever's cheaper first (I saw directors cut of FEAR for 78$ at EB games and I nearly pooped.)
February 17, 200620 yr 78 dollars lol, in aus we pay 99 for a new game which is around 75 dollars us lol.
Create an account or sign in to comment