July 4, 200620 yr Hendrix was ok, but compared to todays badboys he's is average at best I hope that was sarcasm. [edit]There's nothign wrong with todays music btw. nope, Hendrix was very average In your humble opinion. ^The most disturbing signature on Tip.it^Last.fm|HELLY KAYLA!|Oh the mehagurtz!|#Siencemakers"they care less about their spelling mistakes then I." - Lionheart"apinagez... let me
July 5, 200620 yr Hendrix was ok, but compared to todays badboys he's is average at best I hope that was sarcasm. [edit]There's nothign wrong with todays music btw. nope, Hendrix was very average In your humble opinion. no, it's a fact that Hendrix in comparison to other players is incredibly average. he had a huge amount of media attention in his day which is probably why people think he is so legendary.
July 5, 200620 yr no, it's a fact that Hendrix in comparison to other players is incredibly average. A fact? Right, ok, based on what measurement? he had a huge amount of media attention in his day which is probably why people think he is so legendary. So you think back during his time, no MTV, no internet, no real mass media, Hendrix got more media attention than bands of today? Well, I guess if it's a fact we can't argue with it. :-s This is how much you all raised for charity. Thank you.
July 5, 200620 yr im more into metal but my dad listens a lot to hendrix so i started to listen it to and yeah its really cool i like his version of the american anthem :D not everybody wants to hear the bubblegum pop garbage.im gonna burn in hell and drink all of satans beer.trashmetal/deathmetal/hardrock/folkmetal die hard
July 5, 200620 yr The fact that Hendrix was an average technical guitarist should NOT at all take away from the fact that he made excellent music. La lune ne garde aucune rancune.
July 6, 200620 yr no, it's a fact that Hendrix in comparison to other players is incredibly average. A fact? Right, ok, based on what measurement? he had a huge amount of media attention in his day which is probably why people think he is so legendary. So you think back during his time, no MTV, no internet, no real mass media, Hendrix got more media attention than bands of today? Well, I guess if it's a fact we can't argue with it. :-s Wait wait wait wait, I never ever compared Hendrix's media attention to today's standard. Im saying since all the cameras were pointed at him in the day, it's only logical that in our age, he's one of the only guitarists we know about. Today it's even worse, Hendrix actually had some talent, now most bands which are on TV have absolutely no talent whatsoever.
July 6, 200620 yr Today it's even worse, Hendrix actually had some talent, now most bands which are on TV have absolutely no talent whatsoever. Hendrix was ok, but compared to todays badboys he's is average at best Hmmmm... ^The most disturbing signature on Tip.it^Last.fm|HELLY KAYLA!|Oh the mehagurtz!|#Siencemakers"they care less about their spelling mistakes then I." - Lionheart"apinagez... let me
July 6, 200620 yr Today it's even worse, Hendrix actually had some talent, now most bands which are on TV have absolutely no talent whatsoever. Hendrix was ok, but compared to todays badboys he's is average at best Hmmmm... bands... badboys isn't tomaeto tomato. Badboys, I refer to our homies like Satriani, Steve Vai, John Petrucci, Al Di Maeola, John Mclaughlin to name a few I would've thought most people thought of Hendrix as a guitarist, not a band?
July 6, 200620 yr Hendrix is the guitarrist, of course. We aren't that stupid. Each period has it's idols. Will you say Mozart sucks just because his style got old fashioned? Hendrix could make the sound of people talking with his guitar. I'm not saying Satch can't, I don't know, but he did those things in the 60's. He was revolutionary, and if he hadn't been there, problably your badboys would much likely play something else. Anyway, I'm not an expert, so I can't say who's better, technically. Therefore I put all those guys in the same level, and then there are the legends, such as Hendrix. ^The most disturbing signature on Tip.it^Last.fm|HELLY KAYLA!|Oh the mehagurtz!|#Siencemakers"they care less about their spelling mistakes then I." - Lionheart"apinagez... let me
July 6, 200620 yr Hendrix is the guitarrist, of course. We aren't that stupid. Each period has it's idols. Will you say Mozart sucks just because his style got old fashioned? Hendrix could make the sound of people talking with his guitar. I'm not saying Satch can't, I don't know, but he did those things in the 60's. He was revolutionary, and if he hadn't been there, problably your badboys would much likely play something else. Anyway, I'm not an expert, so I can't say who's better, technically. Therefore I put all those guys in the same level, and then there are the legends, such as Hendrix. On the contrary, Mozart's pieces are stilled played today. I never said Hendrix's style is old fashioned though did I? Hendrix making the sound of people talking is a gimmick which says nothing about skill or talent. He wasn't revolutionary, guitarists 100s of years before him have been soloing. The only thing he did which no other guitarists had done before him was make use of modern technology at the time to create sound effects such as wah wah and distortion. These technologies were already available before he used them however so if he hadn't have used them, someone else would have. Hendrix didn't know much music theory at all. I'm not saying he's a bad guitarists, i'm just saying he is average and that he is ridiculously over rated.
July 6, 200620 yr I'm the one saying his style isn't cutting edge, which by no means makes his music worse. Isn't modern technology+solos+a "halo" what Rock's about? Surely if he hadn't done those things, somebody else would. Does that take his merit? No. We don't say Graham Bell wasn't important just because the phone would get invented anyway. Now we get down to the discussion of how much this "halo" matters in Rock. Hendrix became a legend, he had this rock n' roll halo, and, as rock is popular music, media matters. However, the fact he was commercialized doesn't make him worse than any unknown guitarrist. ^The most disturbing signature on Tip.it^Last.fm|HELLY KAYLA!|Oh the mehagurtz!|#Siencemakers"they care less about their spelling mistakes then I." - Lionheart"apinagez... let me
July 6, 200620 yr I'm the one saying his style isn't cutting edge, which by no means makes his music worse. Isn't modern technology+solos+a "halo" what Rock's about? Surely if he hadn't done those things, somebody else would. Does that take his merit? No. We don't say Graham Bell wasn't important just because the phone would get invented anyway. Now we get down to the discussion of how much this "halo" matters in Rock. Hendrix became a legend, he had this rock n' roll halo, and, as rock is popular music, media matters. However, the fact he was commercialized doesn't make him worse than any unknown guitarrist. Graham Bell is different, he worked hard to create the telephone. Hendrix probably picked up his peace pipe and said something like "oh, this **** is going down on my funky nizzle" and that was how distortion was invented. People can call him a legend, he is very overated though. If you enjoy his music fine, but if playing with guitar effects is revolutionary, then he really didn't contribute a great deal to music.
July 6, 200620 yr Anyway, we got where I wanted to get. I crafted your criticism down to a technical level, and here is where I drop the discussion, as I know **** about technic details. May some wise soul come here and destroy your technical point. I laughed at your description of the invention of distortion, though. :P Nice discussion, I'm now moving to the phobias thread. ^The most disturbing signature on Tip.it^Last.fm|HELLY KAYLA!|Oh the mehagurtz!|#Siencemakers"they care less about their spelling mistakes then I." - Lionheart"apinagez... let me
July 6, 200620 yr Anyway, we got where I wanted to get. I crafted your criticism down to a technical level, and here is where I drop the discussion, as I know **** about technic details. May some wise soul come here and destroy your technical point. I laughed at your description of the invention of distortion, though. :P Nice discussion, I'm now moving to the phobias thread. yeah, can't be bothered argueing anymore. He's just one guitarists, there's a great deal more that deserve discussion at some point
July 6, 200620 yr Here's a rope for that hole you've dug. This is how much you all raised for charity. Thank you.
July 6, 200620 yr I think Hendrix is considered a legend because in his day, no one was playing like he was in terms of technique, style and just his general presence on the stage. Modern day guitarists might be better, faster, more technical, but Hendrix is the guy that paved the way for these people to learn guitar in the first place. He's the guy that really took guitar playing by the balls and brought it into the limelight. Kirk and Lars I could handle. At the same time.
July 6, 200620 yr Anyway, we got where I wanted to get. I crafted your criticism down to a technical level, and here is where I drop the discussion, as I know **** about technic details. May some wise soul come here and destroy your technical point. I laughed at your description of the invention of distortion, though. :P Nice discussion, I'm now moving to the phobias thread. yeah, can't be bothered argueing anymore. He's just one guitarists, there's a great deal more that deserve discussion at some point how can you be one guitarists?
July 6, 200620 yr another suburban teenager going with the trend of music. just what we needed 485th person to ever play RuneScapeBlue107- perm banned 10/12/2007. $300 USD reward if you can get me in contact with someone who will take 5 seconds to look at evidence and get my original character unbanned.
July 6, 200620 yr Didn't Hendrix created a guitar for the left-handed? Seeing he himself was left-handed... The man was brilliant in my opinion, I love his music.
July 6, 200620 yr Didn't Hendrix created a guitar for the left-handed? Seeing he himself was left-handed... The man was brilliant in my opinion, I love his music. No, Hendrix played a right-handed guitar upside down.
July 7, 200620 yr Anyway, we got where I wanted to get. I crafted your criticism down to a technical level, and here is where I drop the discussion, as I know **** about technic details. May some wise soul come here and destroy your technical point. I laughed at your description of the invention of distortion, though. :P Nice discussion, I'm now moving to the phobias thread. yeah, can't be bothered argueing anymore. He's just one guitarists, there's a great deal more that deserve discussion at some point how can you be one guitarists? typo?
July 7, 200620 yr Anyway, we got where I wanted to get. I crafted your criticism down to a technical level, and here is where I drop the discussion, as I know **** about technic details. May some wise soul come here and destroy your technical point. I laughed at your description of the invention of distortion, though. :P Nice discussion, I'm now moving to the phobias thread. yeah, can't be bothered argueing anymore. He's just one guitarists, there's a great deal more that deserve discussion at some point how can you be one guitarists? typo? k :3>
July 7, 200620 yr Jimmi handrex is the greatest guitar player, maybe except van halen;'s guitarist, well if you wana see a pk vid, go to the graveyard and look at my pk vid, has purple haze in it :P Quit runescape, Finally....
July 7, 200620 yr Jimmi handrex is the greatest guitar player, maybe except van halen;'s guitarist, well if you wana see a pk vid, go to the graveyard and look at my pk vid, has purple haze in it :P Eddie Van Halen?
Create an account or sign in to comment