October 17, 200619 yr Like allways, very good blending. The background doesnt change when making a new sig, try something else : Maybe the right side should be a bit more lightened, like the left side. [http://woopidoo2.deviantart.com][Tip.it Moderator from Dec 10, 2006 to 03 Sep, 2008]
October 17, 200619 yr Author ppl here continually tell me to do diff things, when i rarely do the same thign in a sig. what is it u want me to change? My photobucket
October 17, 200619 yr Its just some sort of an ''Element'' in your sigs, that make makes them all the same. I think it is the background.. Cant explain :XD: [http://woopidoo2.deviantart.com][Tip.it Moderator from Dec 10, 2006 to 03 Sep, 2008]
October 17, 200619 yr Author so basically its 'my style' - good - ive been aiming for a 'weeboab style' for quite awhile. thx woopi :thumbsup: My photobucket
October 17, 200619 yr so basically its 'my style' - good - ive been aiming for a 'weeboab style' for quite awhile. thx woopi :thumbsup: Ye, try making something really big or something. Maybe a wallpaper, Website lay out? :thumbsup: [http://woopidoo2.deviantart.com][Tip.it Moderator from Dec 10, 2006 to 03 Sep, 2008]
October 17, 200619 yr Author my dad keeps telling me the same thing >< ive done lps and WLs before but not with as much success. thx for ur comment(s) :o My photobucket
October 17, 200619 yr you need to change the title to some sexual pun or joke. Ahh jk. Its not bad overall. v1 is much better. The black and white is weird to me Everybody lovin' it, but ain't no body touchin' it
October 17, 200619 yr you need to change the title to some sexual pun or joke. Done apparantly :lol: Anyways I like it. It has good blending and such and, despite the title, the "guns" aren't really the focus of the sig. The only wierd thing I see is that the corners on the top are kinda rounded and on the bottom are sharp right angles. I think it would look better with rounded corners all around and a border but that's just my personal preference.
October 17, 200619 yr Author i tried to bring in the focus to the centre of the sig as ull see if u look thru the tutorial for it. *hint* i used to do all 4 corners rounded but ppl went 'PMG I HATE THAT BORDER' so i started doin these ones XD thx for ur comments My photobucket
October 17, 200619 yr Just to clear things up: Weeb's sigs look similar because he uses the same style. There's nothing wrong with that. Infact, it's a pretty good thing to have a personal style. What would be bad is if he used the same background every time, which he doesn't. Anyway, very nice sig. Great blending, good text, background is good, colors work well in V1, and the absence of color works well in V2. 8/10. Great job.
October 17, 200619 yr I love it/her/you? :3> Well very nice work anyway. : PS, do you have a DevArt account? The Enrichment Center reminds you that the weighted companion cube will never threaten to stab you and, in fact, cannot speak. In the event that the weighted companion cube does speak, the Enrichment Center urges you to disregard its advice.
October 17, 200619 yr First off, just to point it out, not everything needs to have a b/w version Wee. Sometimes b/w simply does not work for an image. Anyways, brushing is generaly the same I see, and I know that's always been fine so i'm not going to comment on that. I'm not going to really comment on the general techinque, because you do have that down now. (even though, it is good to experiment.) What I am going to talk about a bit though is the actual sig as a whole. I am pretty sure you've seen me post in some other posts, but generaly placing a person (the focus of the piece) in the middle really takes away from the entire sig. Thats because instead of going through on a corner and moving to it (seeing the sig in the process) you simply stare blankly at the anime chick. I "usualy" don't like sigs wih someone in the direct center for that exact reason. I'm not sure if I like it used here or not, haven't really decided. You generaly did bring attention to her (although, 75% of that is because she is in the center, and the rest of everything is pretty low key and low contrast except for what's next to her, which I must say, at least you have that down.) The text is also, at least, this time readable. Looks good too in the sig. I'm not sure if I really like that style of a boarder or not. It seems, IMO, too overused (and not just you but everyone I saw at ChaosGFX...) and perhaps something different is in order. Again, not every sig may look good with a boarder like that. Other than that, there really isn't anything I can say about it. To an extent your kind of staying in a "safe zone" right now. Perhaps try some different styles, or *gasp* a signature that doen't have a video game character or anime chick taking up space in the signature. :wink: . Anyways, i'm not really "too" sure about some parts of the sig. The whole "radial blur" idea you used (the lines all around moving into her) seems a bit too obvious and overdone, even if it is covered up a bit with some good brushing. If I think of anything else i'll post again / edit my post. I just don't think that commenting on the actual technique will do much to help anymore.
October 18, 200619 yr Author id like to point out theres absolutely NO brushing in this sig >.> its all smudging and filters, stuff like that. thx for ur comments tho o and most ppl on CGFX just dont use borders, unless they decided to use em overnight >.< My photobucket
October 18, 200619 yr o and most ppl on CGFX just dont use borders, unless they decided to use em overnight >.< So? You don't have to do the same as everyone else. I use borders, brushing, smudging, gradients and C4Ds. Together, in the same signature. That's the main reason I never post on CGFX, everyone has to be the same. "Oh neos he no use border!!!11 *jumps bandwagon*". - - - - - This signature is ok. Most of your other signatures it looks really like a C4D splat. In this it's clearly visible that there has been smudging and not just relying on C4Ds. It's too dark for my liking, in my opinion it needs about +~20 brightness and +~5 contrast. More brightness and a slight bit more contrast just brings the image to life. I don't really like the way you do your text. Why anime? It's clearly visible, and not really a big variant. It could be a real person holding a gun. Though, atleast this time your text is legible and clear.
October 18, 200619 yr So? You don't have to do the same as everyone else. I use borders, brushing, smudging, gradients and C4Ds. Together, in the same signature. That's the main reason I never post on CGFX, everyone has to be the same. "Oh neos he no use border!!!11 *jumps bandwagon*". Exactly what I stoped posting there lol. I posted a few of my things (nothing like what is on CGFX really) and got maybe 2 replies maximum. Anyways, didn't realize until your tutorial Wee that you used just smudging. I'd have to say that i'd agree with cadbury here and say you should try varrious techniques.
October 18, 200619 yr Author cad, i tell ppl they need a border on CGFX, the majority dont use them so ur not getting the picture :-s and i done the text like that so all those who moan they cant rad my text can see it easily. and why anime? coz it is anime \ My photobucket
October 18, 200619 yr wheres the text? : its a nice sig i like it =) the colours go well and the c4d isnt overused. nice picture and good work on the bg. i cant really find any faults with it, however the top two curved corners dont go well imo, maybe top left and bottom right? a sig doesnt need a boarder and i rarely use one, its up to artists descresion wether he/she uses one. and i havnt used boarders for a while and im no croud follower, so dont say i am. PJB21 100% my own work, i make my own brushes: set 1 set 2
Create an account or sign in to comment