Help Block the North American Union by Repealing NAFTA

Help Block the North American Union by Repealing NAFTA

Help preserve the life of freedom enjoyed and cherished by you and your family. Join in a national movement to keep the U.S. free and independent by blocking the development of the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) and the North American Union (NAU) through repealing the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

This "Repeal NAFTA" campaign enables anti-NAU activists to go on the offensive by working to convince Congress to withdraw U.S. membership in NAFTA as provided for in Article 2205 of the NAFTA agreement. Since NAFTA is the foundation on which the SPP/NAU is being built, U.S. withdrawal from NAFTA would constitute a huge setback in the creation of the NAU.

Send a message to your representative and senators to let them that you want Congress to repeal NAFTA by voting for withdrawal from the agreement. You can send the message here.. :mrgreen:

http://capwiz.com/jbs/issues/alert/?alertid=9580451

:? I like how all the Americans are whining about their rights being taken away by this. I haven't even heard what the Mexicans think, and us Canadians... I don't think anyone even knows.

My point is, as long as its mostly currency that is going to be the same, and the countries are still respectively separate (As in we are not becoming the 51'st and 52nd state) I'm mostly for it. As long as we keep our crime rate as low as ever, and no one gets "the right to bear arms", then im fine.

 

 

 

we dont want you or mexico. exept cancun and cabo :thumbsup:

My point is, as long as its mostly currency that is going to be the same, and the countries are still respectively separate (As in we are not becoming the 51'st and 52nd state) I'm mostly for it. As long as we keep our crime rate as low as ever, and no one gets "the right to bear arms", then im fine.

What do have against that right, you [kitty] fist? I mean Pacifist. :lol:

Hehe, yea! Repeal NAFTA! Block the Union! Practically start a war over nothing!

I hope you realize that around 75% of this forum's members are too young to vote on this. Myself included. Around half of them probably don't even live in North America.

this is not about voteing, it's about sending a message to thier elected leader's telling them to pull out of NAFTA and stop the North American Union. They still can do that..

What's the North American Union?

What's the North American Union?

The Unification of the USA, Canada and the slum we call Mexico.

It would null and void the US Constitution, leaving it open for a new document to be written, which will surely suck [wagon], so it's a pretty big deal.

It's no wonder Bush is doing next to nothing about border security...There will BE no border soon.

No use trying to stop it. It's not going to be stopped.

Tigra, it is NOT a joining of nations. Read. It's similar in design to the EU. You're as much of an over hyper as cryztalwing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Union

"The Independent Task Force on North America was a project organized by the Council on Foreign Relations (U.S.), the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, and the Mexican Council on Foreign Relations. It was chaired by former Canadian politician John Manley and advocates a greater economic and social integration between Canada, Mexico, and the United States." ... "Some Internet sources claim that this report, despite its own language rejecting a political union, would create a North American Union, which would link the three North American countries into a political union in the model of the European Union. Some envision this new North American Union as having its own currency known as the amero, which would replace the Mexican peso, U.S. dollar and Canadian dollar." ... "Robert Pastor, a vice chairman of the CFR task force that produced the report Building a North American Union, has suggested that a common currency might be called the "amero", which would be similar in concept to the euro, the common currency of the EU. Another possible name could be the North American Dollar (NAD)." ... "To date, the three governments have taken no official action on the proposal, either to endorse or reject it. Some opponents have alleged that international discussions around economic and security matters fit within the context of the proposal and are designed to pave the way for a formal set of negotiations on the union."

K. So. What have we learned? Well, despite its popularity in conspiracy theories, the NAU is of little concern to government officials. They aren't for or against it. Even if it was implemented, however, all involved countries would remain largely unaffected. We'd have our currencies. Our laws. Our police forces. Our languages. Our culture. The major differences would be ease of travel, a possible common currency, and the ability to more easily track criminals fleeing the country. No freedoms removed as the first post claims.

Cryztalwing, go choke on an Amero. Stop over dramatizing the NAU and NAFTA.

North American union plan headed to Congress in fall

Powerful think tank prepares report on benefits of integration between U.S., Mexico, Canada

A powerful think tank chaired by former Sen. Sam Nunn and guided by trustees including Richard Armitage, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Harold Brown, William Cohen and Henry Kissinger, is in the final stages of preparing a report to the White House and U.S. Congress on the benefits of integrating the U.S., Mexico and Canada into one political, economic and security bloc.

The final report, published in English, Spanish and French, is scheduled for submission to all three governments by Sept. 30, according to the Center for Strategic & International Studies.

CSIS boasts of playing a large role in the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994 ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Ãâ a treaty that set in motion a political movement many believe resembles the early stages of the European Community on its way to becoming the European Union.

"The results of the study will enable policymakers to make sound, strategic, long-range policy decisions about North America, with an emphasis on regional integration," explains Armand B. Peschard-Sverdrup, director of CSIS' Mexico Project. "Specifically, the project will focus on a detailed examination of future scenarios, which are based on current trends, and involve six areas of critical importance to the trilateral relationship: labor mobility, energy, the environment, security, competitiveness and border infrastructure and logistics."

The data collected for the report is based on seven secret roundtable sessions involving between 21 and 45 people and conducted by CSIS. The participants are politicians, business people, labor leaders and academics from all three countries with equal representation.

All of this is described in a CSIS report, "North American Future 2025 Project."

"The free flow of people across national borders will undoubtedly continue throughout the world as well as in North America, as will the social, political and economic challenges that accompany this trend," says the report. "In order to remain competitive in the global economy, it is imperative for the twenty-first century North American labor market to possess the flexibility necessary to meet industrial labor demands on a transitional basis and in a way that responds to market forces."

As WND reported last week, the controversial "Secure Borders, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Reform Act of 2007," which would grant millions of illegal aliens the right to stay in the U.S. under certain conditions, contains provisions for the acceleration of the Security and Prosperity Partnership, a plan for North American economic and defense integration with remarkable similarities to the CSIS plan.

The bill, as worked out by Senate and White House negotiators, cites the SPP agreement signed by President Bush and his counterparts in Mexico and Canada March 23, 2005 ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Ãâ an agreement that has been criticized as a blueprint for building a European Union-style merger of the three countries of North America.

"It is the sense of Congress that the United States and Mexico should accelerate the implementation of the Partnership for Prosperity to help generate economic growth and improve the standard of living in Mexico, which will lead to reduced migration," the draft legislation states on page 211 on the version time-stamped May 18, 2007 11:58 p.m.

Since agreement on the major provisions of the bill was announced late last week, a firestorm of opposition has ignited across the country. Senators and representatives are reporting heavy volumes of phone calls and e-mails expressing outrage with the legislation they believe represents the largest "amnesty" program ever contemplated by the federal government.

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55830

And as you'll notice, no freedoms will be taken from any countries. There will be a free flow of people across borders, and a combined defence network. Mexico will flourish economically. Good points, all around.

Hmmm, seems kind of pointless to me, everybody is complaining about borders that are too open and they want to kill borders with Mexico all together? It also seems kind of pointless to create a new currency, seeing as the US dollar is already the most powerful currency in the world. I have no problem with having an open borders/economic pact with canada, seeing as they are a well developed country, but doing that with Mexico would wreak havoc on the southern economy.

It also seems kind of pointless to create a new currency, seeing as the US dollar is already the most powerful currency in the world.

The Euro is slightly better than the USD and the English Pound is double the economic value of an USD...

I don't know which is more annoying; globalism or nationalism.

Another possible name could be the North American Dollar (NAD)."

Lol, the NAD. Imagine buying things: "that will be 5 NADs". :lol:

Another possible name could be the North American Dollar (NAD)."

 

Lol, the NAD. Imagine buying things: "that will be 5 NADs". :lol:

Nah, if it was North American Dollars and NAD was the short form, NAD would just be the short form for the currency. If buying stuff one would call it a dollar.

Two years after Canada signed into the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), an all party parliamentary committee held public hearings on the matter. The SPP was signed by former Liberal Prime Minister Paul Martin in March 2005 and is essentially the frame work for a North American Union. NDP Trade Critic Peter Julian said, ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦Ã¢â¬ÅCanadians should know that the SPP process supports a North American Union.ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬ÃâÃ

Well, you my friend should take a seat, grab a drink, and think about it. Most of the stuff your talking about seems that pretty good... Plus everybody likes colored money, just mellow cause its all going to work out in the end.

Besides, I'v seen some posts on this forum, I bet congress workers cant even decipher the atrocious spelling and grammer of most of these forumers.

Another possible name could be the North American Dollar (NAD)."

 

Lol, the NAD. Imagine buying things: "that will be 5 NADs". :lol:

That'd be extremly confusing for me, because people often refer to me as 'Nad' for my nickname. :-s #-o

Well, you my friend should take a seat, grab a drink, and think about it. Most of the stuff your talking about seems that pretty good... Plus everybody likes colored money, just mellow cause its all going to work out in the end.

 

Besides, I'v seen some posts on this forum, I bet congress workers cant even decipher the atrocious spelling and grammer of most of these forumers.

It's not good, sure you probley have no problem with that. The fact is, the North American Union will end America has an free independent nation, also Candada's and Mexico's independence. American's will not have the Bill of Right's under the North American Union.

The formation of the European Union (EU) is the 'blueprint' being used to construct the North American Union (NAU). In an act of tyranny, our government is illegally creating the NAU by using secret meetings and deceptive double-speak to hide their pernicious, TREASONOUS, INCREMENTAL STEALTH. They are making MASSIVE changes to our bureaucratic-administratic-regulatory laws by calling them 'HARMONIZATIONS.' What they are doing is re-writing our legal regulatory law to the benefit OF, BY, and FOR the corporate elite plutocracy. The only difference between the creation of the EU and the NAU is that it took 55 years for the European free trade agreement to morph into the EU. Unless we can stop them, they will accomplish the NAU here in a BREATHTAKING 15 years. The One World Monopolists have already declared before our Congress, that our borders are to be eliminated by 2010. Are you ready for that?

This research will clearly demonstrate what has been created under the EU is EXACTLY what they want to impose upon our Constitutional Republic. How do we know? Because the One World Monopolists have boldly announced their intentions. Dr. Robert A. Pastor, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), "told the Trilateral Commission in 2002 that the North American Union needed to implement a series of political proposals which would have authority OVER the sovereignty of the United States, Canada and Mexico

pecifically, Pastor called for the creation of North American passports and a North American Customs and Immigrations, which would have authority OVER U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) within the Department of Homeland Security. A North American Parliamentary Group would OVERSEE the U.S. Congress. A Permanent Court on Trade and Investment would resolve disputes within NAFTA, exerting FINAL AUTHORITY OVER judgments of the U.S. Supreme Court. A North American Commission would 'develop an integrated continental plan for transportation and infrastructure'."(1)

Their audacious treason knows no bounds!

What 'Political Proposals' REALLY Mean . . .

It means that the 'leaders' of three sovereign nations can gather at a 'round table' and sign the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) agreement which will implement all the concepts outlined by the CFR, WITHOUT the required Constitutionally mandated, Congressional consent, oversight, or transparency.

Political proposals means that three politicians get together and clandestinely agree to use the power of their elected office to unilaterally create the North American Union with no intention of allowing any legislative involvement or permission from We the People. That is, by any measure . . . TREASON!

Those 'heads of state' are part of a cabal that includes the former corporatist robber barons, who control the banks, the media and the non-profit foundations such as the Carnegie, Ford, and Rockefeller (CFR). They constitute a Shadow Government of One World Monopolists who control our government by wielding their immense financial wealth and its associated power. They are operating behind the scenes in collusion with many in high places in our government, military, and corporate world. Their goal is to destroy our Constitutional Republic, usurp our sovereignty and irrevocably alter our lives. They plan to turn North America into a totalitarian state ruled by a corporate plutocracy -- a totalitarian government, OF the wealthy, BY the wealthy, and FOR the wealthy.

The first public mention of their illegal plans was made by the 'leaders' of Mexico, Canada and America on March 23, 2005 in Waco, Texas. Those three traitors of their respective nations, held meetings at Baylor University, and SIGNED a European Union styled pact called the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) of North America. Since then, our 'Chief Executive' has commanded ALL of the departments in the Executive Branch to form 'task forces,' agendas, goals and meet timetables for completion.

Their task is to rewrite MANY of our regulatory laws covering every conceivable topic you can imagine relating to our daily lives. They operate behind closed doors in secret meetings to advance their goal of 'HARMONIZING' ALL of our bureaucratic or administrative regulatory laws, between the three countries, by altering them to their benefit.

Since Waco, our government has lied about having signed the SPP agreement. Their dirty deed was barely reported in the media. There was little to no follow-up reporting by the corrupt, monopolized and controlled corporate media. Just think of all those endless hours of drivel on the news about Anna Nichole Smith, or Michael Jackson, or O J Simpson, or Natalie Holloway, or Gary Condit of Chandra Levy infamy, and yet barely a peep about the single most devastating plan to eliminate our sovereignty and end America as we know it.

Because of the complicit media, We the People are left completely in the dark. For the most part, we have no idea that our country is already being run by an unelected and un-accountable elite plutocracy. Just think about it . . . a 'Shadow Government' and their complicit cabal, were able to direct the launching of the NAU as a political proposal signed by three men who were the duly elected leaders from three sovereign countries. Our Constitution says that such agreements are to be subjected to Congressional oversight and approval.

The SPP is a Trojan Horse based on the EU blueprint of massive 'harmonized' and ILLEGAL regulatory changes, using incremental stealth, all with the intent of destroying our Constitutional Republic.

Hahaha, an American EU? No, please, don't make me laugh. :lol: That's the last thing this poor world needs.

this is good news,thow it does not stop the North American Union. America need's to pull out of NAFTA for that to really happen.

In an historic, first vote in Congress to restrict funding for the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) of North America, yesterday the House approved by a vote of 362 to 63 an amendment to H.R. 3074 (Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2008) "prohibiting the use of funds to participate in a working group pursuant to the Security and Prosperity Partnership."

There's been a growing buzz this year over the SPP and how it's being used as a steppingstone to a North American Union (NAU). Eighteen state legislatures have introduced resolutions asking Congress to block the NAU; three states passed their anti-NAU resolution in one house; and three states passed their anti-NAU resolution in both houses.

Although there is a resolution (H. Con. Res. 40) in the House of Representatives "Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not ... enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada," there has been virtually no congressional oversight over SPP activities, such as the numerous "working groups" with representatives from the United States, Mexico, and Canada. That is to say, virtually no congressional oversight until yesterday, when the House voted overwhelmingly to approve Rep. Duncan Hunter's (R-Calif.) amendment to prohibit any funds appropriated by the Transportation and Housing and Urban Development Appropriations Act of 2008 from being used for U.S. participation in SPP working groups.

In a related development, on July 23, Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.) introduced an amendment to H.R. 3093 (Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2008), stating "None of the funds in this Act shall be made available for the Security and Prosperity Partnership." Thus, this amendment would permit no funding for the SPP from the funds appropriated for the Commerce Department in 2008. This is highly significant because the Commerce Department coordinates the ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦Ã¢â¬ÅProsperityÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬ÃâÃ

Despite the deafening silence in the US and Canadian media (Have they put ANY reporters on this in the lamestream media? one wonders .. hard to find them!!) the purpose of the upcoming conference to be held in Montebello, Quebec is to ratify the Security and Prosperity Protocol (SPP) of North America, which was initiated by Bush, Martin and Fox in 2005.

This so-called ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¹ÃâpartnershipÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢ will result in what the politicians refer to as ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¹Ãâcontinental integrationÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢-newspeak for a North American Union- and basically are a harmonization of 100ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢s of regulations, policies and laws. What we have here, really, is the plan to highjack the North American continent by a very small contingent of industrialists, government cronies and thinktanks. following the clampdown after the 9/11 synthetic terror event. As the slogan says .. Security and Prosperity for WHOM?

Once this ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¹ÃâpartnershipÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢ has been ratified as fait accompli; we will be following in the footsteps of the European Union. It will mean that the US, Mexico and Canada will become part of the North American Union by 2010, and resources, agricultural, health and environment issues, to name a few, will be controlled not by the 3 Three Amigo's countries of the US, Canada and Mexico, but by the government of the North American Union.

Only there is a BIG difference: you see these two little member countries needs are DWARFED by Superpower the US! It's not the same as the European Union at ALL. Europe wasn't bogged down in an era of genocide and endless war either at the start of the EU .. comparisons are not apt. Mere size of the countries alone would show that this cannot be the same.

At this time, we are lead to believe that the "summit" of the elite will be discussing, or making pronouncements, on what is to be done if there is a pandemic or national emergency. What that implies, alone is cause for concern ...

What's Up?

The coming megolithic ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¹ÃâNAFTAÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢ highway, one quarter of a mile wide, is already being built in Texas, where private land is being expropriated, and will eventually reach the Manitoba border and go on from there ... it allows the west coast shipping ports to be circumvented, instead relying on huge Mexican port, in the name of facilitating "free trade" . but free trade of what ..? Asian drugs ..? And how is that port to be defended?

Water (the new gold) will be the ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¹ÃâissueÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢ of this century, as more than 25 states in the U.S. are currently in desperate need. Where do you think they will get the water they need? Canada claims 20% of the world's fresh water "reserves"!! and plans to get it out where developed IN SECRET by the Center for Strategic and International Affairs in Washington DC; they very people who brought you the shock and awe technique used in bombing Iraq into submission. Just who is deciding who gets the resources as they dwindle ..?

The United States is already guaranteed 60% of Canadian natural gas resources from NAFTA, which mean that even during emergencies when Canadians need energy that cannot have it. This is somewhat perplexing since Canada only has nine (9) years of PROVABLE gas supplies for itself. Canada is asked to import it! in case of shortage ... This is just one example of how Canada is being shortchanged, and itÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢s only going to get worse. Even people in Harper's own Conservative party are aghast at this, which was only revealed in Parliament by Gordon Laxer - and the committee Chairman walked out in protest of his testimony!! -- a first in Canadian history. So much for government transparency. When will the truth be told?

Mexico is so far exempted out of the energy equation; they are in control of the energy part of the 'protocol' and have a state run cartel.

As Linda McQuaig author of It's about the Crude, Dude: Greed, Gas, War and the American Way points out, PM Harper's stand on giving away Canada's resources is DEEPLY troubling - He talked about CONTINENTAL energy in London, saying that Canada would be "self serving" to keep this energy for itself. He is paid to protect Canada resources. Any wonder that Canadians are wondering that perhaps their Prime Minister is advocating treason ..? What would happen if the roles were reversed . would American be "self serving" to hang onto ITS resources if Canada had an emergency? Linda's books are worth a deep read: try Holding the Bully's Coat: Canada and the US Empire as well. Canada's elite are rapidly embracing American Values ...

This is NAFTA plus Homeland Security and only "the elite" get the advantage.

But there is more WAY more than just this. Are are we to find out what is going on?

Way too many questions

Canada is in charge of the presentations on border equalization while the US holds the hand dealing out cards on trade regulation. Hmmm.

People who are "in the know" in Canada are are baffled and asking an obvious question these days: Why has there been absolutely NO public consultation on the biggest issue (North American Union) facing Canadians since Confederation? And where is the US CONgress on this issue? With the single exception of a House vote on a transport issue, everything is quiet. Too quiet ...

What has happened to democracy? ... or maybe more accurately .. why have we devolved into demo-craaaazee?

Hello! Construction of a 2 km fence with a razor sharp top has already started along the route 148 outside Montebello, Quebec pending the upcoming SPP summit and is due for completion sometime during the week. Plans for a sedate public forum to discuss the SPP and the coming NAU were suddenly cancelled when the US Army, the RCMP and local Quebec police refused to lease a hall outside in Papaneuville to the Council of Candians. Rapidly on the heels of this news, a 25 km security perimeter was announced and a limit was placed to five (5) people per van in the area as per instructions by the US Army, the RCMP and local police. This brought about such a resistance that now those involved are determined to shout BuZh and cronies out of town. This is not going to be easy. Previous attempts to stop globalization have resulted in the use of terrifying weapons, and people in Canada are putting themselves on the line. We need YOUR support.

Government claims to be democratic, but in fact, does it act like one, or does iit prefer to make the big decisions at committee level behind closed doors, while masking its real intentions?

These are just the tip of the iceberg of many, many troubling questions .. ones to which answers are not forthcoming.

What's at stake?

The ratification of the SPP, and the emergence of the North American Union have been organized entirely by government committees and private enterprise for THEIR benefits which simply "won't do"! if we are to live through the 21st century. A very new alliance is being formed as opposition gets organized. The flatbed truck will bear banners attacking the North American loss of jobs under NAFTA. The US alone has lost 5000 jobs due to NAFTA, and the NAU will guarantee that more jobs will go SOUTH of the Mexican border. People are pretty fed up with the "taxobabble" that is directed at them as superprofits SOAR. And now we face what has been called "NAFTA on crack" or "NAFTA on steroids".

Privatization of our resources, transnationals holding ALL the cards, and Canadian and Mexican governments with less and less authority will be a lasting legacy of DIS integration for all our chldren. We simply must stick together to avoid the inevitable widening of the rich/poor divide, the endless "taxobabble", the breakdown of environmental law, and perhaps to avoid the meltdown of the entire Arctic which is now up for grabs.

Some Answers ... Our next steps as progressives

I've read that in order to "opt" out of the SPP, states may have to secede. Thirteen states in addition to Idaho are calling on Congress to abandon the SPP: Georgia, Arizona, Missouri, Illinois, Oregon, Montana, South Carolina, Oklahoma, Utah, South Dakota, Tennessee, Washington and Virginia.

Below are some great resources. They are provided in the hopes that YOU will do a couple of things to support us up here in Canada.

One is to learn as much as you can. Another is to write your media and CONgress (or Parliamentarian) and ask why you are being kept in the dark about the upcoming union.

And a third suggestion is that you hold a teach-in or just have people come around and chat about what is being hidden. There more youtube videos and articles posted on my blog you can use as resources, too. Hold a youtube party for those you know will be interested in this.

Just chat this up with your neighbors, your friends and those you love as this is happening very rapidly. It goes to Congress for presentations and ratification this fall, under the direction of Henry Kissinger. It's now 11:59 on the countdown clock.

As so many of the corporations are household names and we use their services and products every day, we must gbe aware the this is so engraned and embedded, that we must fight the SPP from many angles, say McQuaig. Just as THEY, the corporate elite are all complicit in this together, we are all in this together.

Our landlord is stealing our HOUSE! Time to kick him OUT. Although America is beset with problems; this is no time to ignore the latest assault on social justice. Truly, help us STOP THE SPP!!

http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera ... e_to_l.htm