Everything posted by Hedgehog
- 93-99 Range
-
93-99 Range
I'm not sure if it would half it, but it's the wrong spot for a reason.
-
93-99 Range
Good question I recommend using a karil's crossbow and see what happens. That should get you another ~30k xp per hour. Using the right spot might get you the rest of the way there.
-
26-Nov-2013 Coinshare, World Map and Tutorial
:)
-
93-99 Range
I know multiple people who have been pked and/or seen pkers Are you using the correct spot? Are you letting the monsters become unaggressive? Getting half the xp/hour is a clear indication that you're doing something wrong. Using a scrimshaw or void won't fix it.
-
93-99 Range
http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/Momentum Risk of dying is so small that there is no reason to not use all available best gear that you have. Follow the guide I posted earlier to the letter, if that doesn't work then you are beyond my help. Otherwise try frosts, or even armadyl solo. There's guides for those on youtube as well. There are a lot of abyss pkers, so he should be cautious when doing the abyss. There's nothing to worry about at dags though.
-
Post all RS Screenshots, Videos, and Sounds here!
Uh its called rebind mouse click to a key so you click with a button... sigh some times you need to wonder about them. how the hell is he computer literate enough to even post on the forums, let alone get a job at a major game company...you can do that WITHOUT EVEN REBINDING ANY KEYS on a laptop, and I don't even know how you would do it on a tablet...it's way harder to click one spot over and over with precision with your finger then with the mouse. I'm honestly not sure how he and the person who hired him haven't been fired yet. I wouldn't let someone like that work for me.
-
26-Nov-2013 Coinshare, World Map and Tutorial
The loading screen and login page have changed. I like it.
-
blue dragons, :)
Just use normal antifires. You should only ever use supers against the qbd. Dont use an antidragon shield either.
-
11-Dec-2012 - Player-Owned Ports
Or otherwise balance the abilities.
-
11-Dec-2012 - Player-Owned Ports
Yep, concentrated blast
-
11-Dec-2012 - Player-Owned Ports
Virtus weaponry has an illogical value anyway. It's horrifically over priced. I agree that a level 80 weapon shouldn't be worth as much as a level 90 weapon, but it isn't due to illogical behavior within the economy.
-
11-Dec-2012 - Player-Owned Ports
I'm saying that it would only devalue virtus because people are illogical. It'd be useless in the metagame, and I'm not sure how I feel about that. I don't think good weaponry should be that easy to obtain, but I'd like the new content to have a purpose.
-
11-Dec-2012 - Player-Owned Ports
What I said in no way contradicts that.
-
11-Dec-2012 - Player-Owned Ports
I'm torn On one hand, I'd like to have a useful level 85 weapon. On the other hand, I don't want useful equipment to be so easily obtainable. Chaotics are very useful, and they do take a fair amount of time to get. Yes, once you are 95+ you can get a chaotic an hour, or even less, but going from 1 to 80 for your initial 2m xp is HORRIBLY painful. I was getting at that a level 85 staff would be completely useless because a virtus wand and book would outclass it basically everywhere. The price of virtus would even go down because of illogical people (and you know we have a lot of those) would use the staff, which would make virtus even easier to get.
-
11-Dec-2012 - Player-Owned Ports
I'm torn On one hand, I'd like to have a useful level 85 weapon. On the other hand, I don't want useful equipment to be so easily obtainable.
-
F2P Skiller Help.
The idea of remaining f2p is to impose a restriction on how you play in order to make it more challenging. Using a lamp on agility in no way makes your gameplay easier. Therefore the restriction was never lifted, so you can still call yourself a f2p skiller. The only issue is that people could see your agility level and assume that you got members at some point, but that can easily be dealt with.
-
Things that annoy the HELL out of you.
Alfredo sauce? I've had that on pizza and it's pretty good but I still prefer just cheese and tomato sauce
-
Future Update Discussions
At the witch's house in Taverly
-
11-Dec-2012 - Player-Owned Ports
You say that like requiring a 99 stat to get a T60 item is a good thing... But of course, that's a topic for a different thread entirely. It's not like it's the only option at level 60
-
Future Update Discussions
Tbf they have made the point Zamorak is used as an antagonist and Saradominists have said he is evil, but of course their view is biased. I think their trouble is over-expecting of the average player. Many users around this forum have the awareness to realise Jagex are using character bias and such and ultimately, all the views we've been given where Zamorak = evil have this bias due to Saradominist sources and that therefore it may not be true, though we lack anything in-game yet to really show otherwise. But I'd imagine the average scaper is not on the ball enough to make this distinction and a half-assed DoC style quest showing this off isn't going to outweigh the mountains of other info in their minds. It's also a bit silly in that, quite clearly, the original lore was built on good, evil and balance. Yes they may be trying to create more nuances now, but the foundation we have is undeniably the blue good guy, the red evil guy and the green nature guy in between balancing them out. Even as the lore evolved this kinda remained true Zaros was just a tacked on omg so bad even the evil guy wants you to forget about him. Arma and Bandos were just tacked on as war and peace/justice and other gods were just sporadic name-drops with no real solidity to them. Yet they are currently trying to make out these nuances have always existed and we should've known all along. Yeah, that's what I was getting at. Even though Zamorak is outright called "evil" by Saradominists (and Zamorakians too) due to bias, you can't expect the average player to pick up on it. I'm sure that if there was a poll of the entire population, the majority of people would think that Zamorak is an evil god. They really should redo older quests to emphasize that gods don't really represent things, but rather just have personalities and characteristics. Quest guides need to start helping the case too. Look at the Hazeel Cult guide on a number of sites. They refer to the Zamorakian side as evil a lot.
-
Future Update Discussions
They also refer to Zamorak as the evil god in multiple quests.
-
Post all RS Screenshots, Videos, and Sounds here!
I upped my production value a little
-
Future Update Discussions
We get pet unicorns and ponies before Prifddinas, Menaphos, Freneskae, Acheron, Kudos Island, the Eastern Lands (beyond what we see in player-owned ports), various skill reworks, a dozen or so quests, high-level boss content, and countless other highly-anticipated updates
-
200M in all Skills
Well, as long as players assume the owners of the game don't know what they're doing, it must be OK to do and have no repercussions right? owners?>.> i think u missed something mod balance and inifinity are new and dont understand at all what are they talking :) Or you know, Jagex, who DOES own the game (well I guess IVP in a sense now, but they aren't the ones who actually create anything). Just sick of all this arrogance among the player base thinking they "know better" than people who actually are part of the company who is making the rules. It's a rule for a reason, if you don't like it, suck it up and move on. If you really want to just assume that you know better, then continue breaking it and don't complain if/when you get banned for it. Well, you see, the rule is incredibly stupid, so when a jmod supports it out of the blue, it makes them look pretty stupid.