Zonorhc

I and a number of people I know only use "lol" in Real LifeÃÆââââ¬Ã¾Ãââ for the sweet, sweet irony.

Go go thread necromancy!

Through glaring Plot HoleÃÆââââ¬Ã¾Ãââ, the fact the he is clearly not an assassin, or a complete violation of suspension of disbelief? I don't know. You tell me. Seriously there's no point asking anyone questions if there's barely enough detail in your piece to ask about. Each part of this that you put up is, what, two paragraphs.

Alright, that's it. You think you have problems, kid? What about the people out there in the world that crap like this happens to on a regular basis? People who have far more important things to think about in their lives than what you would ever have in your positively tormenting years of adolescence. People who have mortgages to pay off, families to feed and jobs to think of, who are assaulted, harassed and whatever else the scum of the earth decides to do to them. Do you think they know what to do? Hell, half of them don't, which is why they talk to people and ask for advice. Now, that's exactly what you're doing, but the key difference between you and these people is that they get off their backsides and actually do something about their problems instead of just sitting there seemingly disregarding everything that's being told them and just continuing to whine about how dreary and gloomy their lives are, and how many problems they have. Face it. Your little problems don't make you special. You're not the only to ever be bullied or assaulted. So you think you have a lot of problems, and you're not even 14? Tough luck. It isn't going to get any better for you. So if you don't intend to do anything about your bloody problems now, like talk to the police or press charges, since according to your statements, you've had your life threatened, you might as well just sit back and not say a further word, because it's clear that you don't actually intend to alleviate your woes anytime soon.

Press charges. Problem solved.

Of Ladies and Gentlemen In which we pass wind, speak with demons, and learn the secrets of secret Meetings. Whereupon we learn what it is to Be a guardsman, the dilemma of upper-class chefs, and how the egoes of short people are formed. Please leave your comments here or on deviantART. Thank you. =)

You've obviously not seen a skilled bullwhip handler in action. They have a longer range than a sword, and can slice down to the bone on a single stroke. I wouldn't want to take on a whipmaster with a sword. That's the sort of thing I want a .454 Casul for 8-) or failing that a crystal bow. Depends on the sword and style. If you give an arming sword to a complete buffoon, then yes, he'll have several types of hell created specifically for his immediate existence. Give it to someone who actually knows what footwork is, what balance is for, and how to use his weight in tandem with his weapon and you might as well not even have a match.

We should have a Social Darwinism skill, where you gain levels by questioning the future development of humanity with consideration to people such as the original poster.

What? You're advocating for Kim Jong Il to have nuclear weapons? ShadowFaxPZ, I suggest you take your religious flaming out of this thread. This is a thread about North Korea's nuclear ambitions, not your own hardline opinions on Islam. I take it you are a Christian?

Seriously, what's up with that? It's obvious Agent Smith could fork, so why was there no spoon?! *Brain shorts out*

Helping by massacring their people? It's really naive to think that US is there to help the locals. They are there to help themselves, their economy (yes, they lose money on the war, but make it from the oil and rebuilding the place they've bombed) and their lifestyle. At the moment USA&European countries have caused the death of 39-43,000 civilians (includes women and children) in Iraq and and some thousands in Afghanistan. Is that what you're bringing? Death, pain and anger? At this point you could always show some info on the dead US soldiers. Well, I tell you; don't. Personally I'd be more than willing to grab a gun and shoot if some foreign country attacked us. And have you accounted for the number of schools, hospitals and other public services the US army has set up for the people of Iraq? No. Of course you haven't, because the media has said bugger all about it. How is the US helping themselves? The oil network in Iraq has gone completely to the dogs. It was barely operable under Saddam's regime due to lax maintenance, and what? Now you expect the US to be sending its soldiers off to work the pumps? The US is making NO oil profit from Iraq at all. There isn't even anything worth taking from Iraq. If anything, the only truly bad thing the US has done by invading Iraq is destabilizing the region and giving the media an excuse to misinform the people about the circumstances of the conflict. Kim Jong Il is stable in my books. He's running a fairly successful drug syndicate out of his office spanning the entire country without anyone able to object. He's dangerous, immoral and a complete idiot for what he's doing, but I wouldn't go so far as to call him unstable. As soon as he decides to nuke any of his neighbours, guess what happens? China shuts off the power and food, and North Korea starves while dying of the cold. China may still be nervous about Japan because of the atrocities commited during World War 2, but they'd be a hell of a lot more nervous about a dictator who wants to use his nuclear capabilities as a bargaining chip. Japan also has the capability to shoot down ballistic missiles. I wouldn't be too surprised if South Korea could as well. Nobody will throw nuclear weapons around as the first reaction to an attack. Despite what anyone else says, Iran's leaders are not stark raving mad. They won't risk using nuclear weapons which they probably don't even have, when America is able to blow several hundred types of crap out of them until their country glows green.

Bahahahahaha.

Welcome, mortal. Leave your sanity at the door. It is not required here.

It is, isn't it? Then again, Russia has had a history of naming its ridiculously huge weapons "Tsar". The Tsar Cannon, Tsar Bomb...

The only weapon to ever be developed that produced a yield of 50mt was the Tsar Bomba, created during the Cold War by the Soviet Union. Only one was ever made. Very few operable nuclear weapons today are able to breach 25mt, with the vast majority still in the kiloton range.

Dude, he threw a harpoon through a window. What an assassin is doing carrying a harpoon around is beyond me. Unless he was, of course, assassinating some sort of large fish or marine mammal.

Offler, the Crocodile God (Discworld); Thor (Norse); and Myself. They're the only manly gods left!

Wasn't it mentioned in an article in the past that UO has a higher GDP than some small countries through its gold farming trade?

Whips are stronger than swords irl... What are you smoking? Have you ever used a sword?

Name one armed conficted that has never had scandles. Every Conflict has them to say that its just Unique to this would be wrong. There have been WMD's found just really old ones and yes I dont think they knew about them. He may not have known there wasnt any, atho I personally think He knew there wasnt. He just whent with whatever he could to go in there and take saddam out. Saddam by no means was a good ruler. He was crule to His people and commited meny crimes agianst them. He needed to be removed If not for that alone. Those chemical weapons they found, while old and inoperable, still constitute as evidence that Saddam was in violation of the treaties stating that he was supposed to collect and destroy all his chemical weapons and halt their associated research programs. While not the original reason for the US to invade Iraq, it gives them some justification. I see here a distinct amount of anti-Bush sentiment without any actual facts to back it up. Can people actually post something relevant rather than "omg i r hate bush he r stoopid!!11!"?

The UN, along with the entire Zionist movement, takes precedence over your opinion. Going by your logic, Australia, America, England, Japan, India, the majority of South-East Asia, Spain, and a lot of other nations should be wiped off the map because it's "not their land". Jerusalem was a Jewish city even in Roman times. And also, WHAT EMPs? The only current possible way to generate an EMP is through a nuclear explosion.

China wants stability in its region, because that's what keeps its booming economy going. Not to mention that without the US or other Western nations, it has virtually no market to dump its vast amount of produced consumer goods in. The last thing you'd want in China's situation is a war because Kim Jong Il decides that he wants to use his nuclear capabilities as a bargaining chip against the US for more food and aid. China helped North Korea in the Korean war, yes, but that was in the 1950s. Nowadays, I wouldn't put it past Beijing to just shut off everything it supplies to North Korea and leave that failed nation to starve, although it would still be unlikely to support a US invasion. The last thing China needs now is to have its markets cut off by war.

Do something random, like run around with your pants around your ankles, or flail your arms for a few minutes. Hell, I met my girlfriend that way. ... the second one.

It'd have more effect if you put him in a rocking chair, pointing the cane to something off-frame. Or perhaps duking it out with a bunch of youths, and wiping the floor with them using the cane. Maybe with lasers coming out of his eyes, too... Oh man, that would be SO cool.

The JSDF has recently been licensed to produce ABMs. I believe that if Pyongyang decides to launch any missiles in America's direction, the Japanese would NOT appreciate having any of those fly over their heads - which they WILL, considering that Japan is directly under the flight path of any missiles Kim Jong Il might decide to fire off. With Japan's shiny current and upcoming ABMs, I wouldn't be surprised to see most of those missiles shot down as soon as the crap alarm goes off when they're picked up by surveillance. North Korea causing a racket in East Asia by rattling its nuclear sabre brings up the point of China, which, as people have said, is a superpower. It's in the middle of a huge economic boom which pretty much relies on regional stability to keep it going. What happens if Pyongyang decides to shake things up? China flicks the switch and they lose power and food. The fact that Beijing and Washington are still at odds over the Taiwan issue doesn't stop anyone getting ticked off if a North Korean dictator decides to upset things in the region further.