Rainy_Day

Eurgh, I hate people that wear such shirts. It reveals how girly they look underneath most the time. I never see a use for such shirts. Some muscular guys with waxed chests wear them, and I can't help but think "really?...", most girls I know hate the look down in sunny Devon. :mellow:

Not to quote you, but the specific examples of yours that were removed are hardly ones we would think to censor. I'm sure no one has the time to block every word with a mixture of @~)£&$"£ etc. It's a waste of our time, it's far easier to just remove it and warn you for it. You knew it was breaking rules when you wrote it in such a way that it evades the censor. Our mods are inefficient because you cannot argue without swearing? That makes sense. If you could debate/argue without the need to swear, your posts wouldn't ring alarm bells when a member or moderator reads them.

Please use the RS section for RS related topics, and please include something in your first post so that the topic makes sense. :thumbup:

I would love for that to be evidenced, to be honest, as in all my time as a moderator/admin on Tip.It, I'm yet to hear of a case where a moderator has explicitly insulted somebody on the forums.

An English cricketer? I can deal with that. @ Sif_Lysbaerer - My first thought was of the movie "The Ring" where the girl's hair covers her face and she comes for you. D:! Ew, that girl give me the creeps. :P But it's impossible to control that much hair when spinning around.. That movie gave me nightmares like crazy. I think I was 15 when I saw the first one.

An English cricketer? I can deal with that. @ Sif_Lysbaerer - My first thought was of the movie "The Ring" where the girl's hair covers her face and she comes for you. D:!

Suddenly, our relationship became awkward.

Is when I'm walking miles each day on "holiday". :(

During my trip to NY. Only photo that I'm remotely happy in. :mellow:

Last bought Super Mario Bros for the wii, and am currently playing Resident Evil 5.

Coolio - Gangsta's Paradise

Disturbed - Forsaken

Poppycock. People have been warned/banned before for admitting to breaking Jagex rules. Your scenario is based on a flawed assumption. I've seen plenty of people post pictures of scams, lures, etc. And yeah, they're still here. Flawed assumption, yup. :rolleyes: If you had read the rules, you would see that we rely on our users to report content. So thanks for complaining about it being there, but not helping us to remove it by actually reporting it. :thumbup:

To sum up my thoughts, a review from iTunes:

If you want to regain access to an old forum account, please use the following link: http://forum.tip.it/account_problem.php

Hello.

Good day, H2PM.

Hi guyz, what's going on in this hurr topic?

I'm far to lowly for that :( But it would gain the interest of specific teams.

i strongly disagree with you and would say a lot more except when i did that they booted my reply. so i'll say this there images nothing more. they are made from ink or pixels so whats your prob. you don't have to like them i personally think they are fine. i also think you are a pathetic excuse for a man sorry and yes that was supposed to offend you. if your a chick i guess you have the right to hate it. but in all seriousness give it a shot it ain't as bad as you think or maybe it is haven't seen that many too bussy watching stuff like full metal alchemist and dragonball z. so maybe i ain't the best person to chat you up about it. here are the pros and the cons as far as i'm concerned. 2. they may have an influence on pedos that make them actually try and rape kids. thats it for the bad. 1. the serve as an outlet for pedos alowing them to focus on that instead of actual school. 2. they are entertaining. 3. they are proven to make me laugh. 4. it is within the law. 5. it does not involve any real children. 6. it is impossible for it to creat pedo files since pedophelia is a mental disorder. 7. they are cartoons. i mean for peats sakle they are cartoons nothing more. they can neither be wrong nor right and it is impossible to figure out if they are moraly correct since every one of us has a diffrent opinion on what is moraly correct Okay, as a man who enforces the law in England and has had his run ins with situations where children have been inappropriately touched, and having a friend's young sister inappropriately touched, I take a strong view against such material, especially material that is against the law. Key point, it's my main reason for disagreeing with the production/distribution of such imagery. People can be opportunistic, and if they get bored of the images and turn to real images, this will only end up with real children being affected. Which is disgusting. See the above point. Entertaining for people who like cartoon nude children, I guess. If cartoon naked children make you laugh, sure. See above, not over here it isn't. See above. It can drive someone to involve real children. See above. Have an award. Tbh, not sure if troll. & what H2PM said. Also, if you are here asking our views on whether it is right or wrong, quite frankly, how dare you get funny at somebody who takes a stance against it. Be prepared for many people with such a view. :thumbup:

It sexualizes children, and is perverted. I don't condone it, and question why any 'normal' adult would want to look at the pictures. Pretty sure it's illegal in the UK anyway, and rightfully so.

Metallica - The Unforgiven II

This sums it up nicely. Locked. Feel free to repost and make sense though.

Ze question has been answered, as such I'm locking ze topic. Let's all try not to be so rude to one-another as well. :mellow: