Robert_de_Sable

Depression medication...?

If we would just euthanize the mentally ill like I suggest, we wouldn't have these kinds of problems. I don't mean offense towards disabled people, I really don't. I just feel that it's the right thing to do.

Sure, but who cares? They're just rabbits.

That's what I hate. Absolutley despicable. I completely agree with you. Wow, that was weird... :P But seriously, Judaism is an extremely old religion. And yes, pretty much right from the beginning we have been oppressed. It's a pity to see it continue every day. As a kid, people would call me "kike" almost everyday at school. It'd be nice to see it end.

Yeah, and Desert Eagle's aren't weapons, they're fire-spears.

I prefer left shift, personally.

You can spell "experience" but not "unusual?" :|

Hoping for Detroit in 7. I like seeing teams win at home.

Humans are animals. We are superior animals. Get it right. You'll need to back up your argument if you make one. You're wrong and i'm right won't convince anyone. We are animals, yes. I concede this. However, we are superior in that we have built this earth (try not to take that literally), shaped it the way we wished to shape it, and made it our own. No other animal has succeeded in doing this, hence our superiority.

Humans are animals. We are superior animals. Get it right.

[hide=Basic Arabic Conversation]??-???? ?????. ??? ?-???? ? ????? ??-???. ??-??? ???. ? ??? ??? ?-???? ??-??? ????. Hello. How are you? Hello (Exclusively responsive). I'm good, and you? I'm good.[/hide] I'd like to see some other languages, some of them look really fascinating.

Our ability to communicate on a level far superior to that of any other animal. Our ability to create what we imagine. This is what makes us such great civilization-builders. Our ability to use logic and reasoning to solve problems. May I inquire how you know that we can communicate at a superior level to that of animals? Our ability to create what we imagine, hmm. Does that really set us apart? Animals can create what they can imagine given the tools the need. Sure they're not going to manipulate things to a degree that we can, but that's not a difference, only a variance in skill. Other creatures use logic all the time. Sometimes they make mistakes because of their ignorance. Are you implying that we do not? In regards to my statement, I was not speaking in a literal sense. Of course we are "mapped" differently, if only by accident. But does that not give us a common ancestry: a series of accidents? You could point out many differences with simply five letters, A, U, T, C, and G. Yeah, and homosexuality and heterosexuality are really no different, right...? Differences and variances are the same thing. Humans>animals.

Does the word "hug" sound weird to anyone else right now?

Our ability to communicate on a level far superior to that of any other animal. Our ability to create what we imagine. This is what makes us such great civilization-builders. Our ability to use logic and reasoning to solve problems.

I honestly don't care very much about gay marriage. Go ahead and get married if you want. Doesn't affect me. :| Are you serious?

You cry about derailing topics, egotistical battles, attempting to gain credibility, and detracting from the board and you're doing it 10 times worse than them. You're bringing up stuff from almost two years ago. Normally I'd insult you, but you're insulting yourself enough. =D> =D> =D> Well said, Zierro.

What ? You are making no sense. Options 1.) She has the ability to raise the child thus she has the right to raise the child 2.) She does not have the ability to raise the child thus she is not allowed to raise the child 3.) She does not have the ability to raise the child thus she is allowed to raise the child 4.) She has the ability to raise the child and is denied that right. [For no apparent reason] To me, 1 and 2 seem the most logical whereas 3 is plain idiotic. 4 has no relevance. then it's hers to keep What do you mean by this, Robert ? You seem confused. Or you're looking for a fight. Either way, explain please. Sorry, awkward wording. I mean unless it is physically impossible to properly rear up her child then it is hers to raise.

#-o They have no right to do this. Unless she actually has no capability to raise the child, then it's hers to keep. Maybe you should have a professional teach you about basic sentence capitalization?

I absolutely LOVE paintballing. Unfortunately my friend closed down his paintballing business, so I don't get to as much anymore. We didn't play the normal-style games though... mostly hostage stuff with snipers and the whole deal. It was great fun, though.

Jail people just because they're "nasty". I hope to God you never lead a country...much less a town. What the hell are you talking about? The guy pleaded guilty. As in, before the trial when the judge says "How does the defendant plead?" he said "Guilty". It was his choice...now why, I don't know. It clearly has something to do with the DVDs and the computer images.

Are you refering to all types of porn? Knowing him, he probably is serious about all types. Then again, he's a morality [bleep] regardless. No, I'm only referring to underage porn. Not just child, but also 18-.

#-o :wall: I take it you're talking about the nuclear proliferation treaty...?

I hate it when people say things like this. Crosby is debatably the best player in the NHL.

He probably had CP on those two.

This man should be in prison for a long, long time. Pornography should be illegal, but images depicting child pornography? Please... that's disgusting. This man is a menace to society and deserves all the prison time he gets. I want you to think about how stupid that is. What if I'm a mailman and I notice that there are materials in someone's mail that could theoretically be used to make a bomb? Can I search that? According to you, no, I can't.