AdioLovesSquall

www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJDUwUUlFrY RAWR!

next to my darkthrone 'a blaze in the northern sky' shirt, a far distance away from my mayhem's 'deathcrush' shirt, but hidden behind my atheist 'unquestionable presence' shirt...lies a shirt i am not too proud of, none other than an aaron carter shirt, with a picture of aaron carter on the front with the text 'aaron's party' and on the back it says 'come get it'. .............you got me.

who the hell is whining besides yourself (about whining that doesn't even exist nontheless) this doesn't even have anything to do with sub-genres, stop [bleep]ing.

man i try to keep this on topic and keep it going with actual christian metal and now we got really bad recs of non-christian bands. ...and no, none of that aforementioned [cabbage] is metal; and yes, i'm right, and i know more than you, i know all there is to metal, i am a major authority on metal, etc. [hell, i'll even do some comparisons for u. :)] although, i'll have to give you kudos for the courage, my good friend. lol nin signature.

i saw the spirit, and it sucked.

like 99% of the bands mentioned all are metalcore lol. if you want some 'christian metal' - then you go check out bands like trouble (us) or torquient, or even stryper but they all suck lol

^Yes.

The Vanishing (Spoorloos) 1988 - i really liked it, and yeah, the ending did live up to all the hype. :|

I think it more has to do with their overwhelming historical significance in black metal, and the murder of course. So Black Sabbath...? What?

I think it more has to do with their overwhelming historical significance in black metal, and the murder of course. Regardless, I could always listen to Deathcrush, no matter the circumstances, but DMDS is another story.

well required required listening? burzum - hvis lyster tar oss sacramentum - far away from the sun enslaved - vikingligr veldi bathory - first 4 albums darkthrone - the 'trilogy' (a blaze in the northern sky/under a funeral moon/transilvanian hunger) nokturnal mortum - goat horns summoning - dol guldur vinterland - my last chapter s.v.e.s.t - urfaust abigor - nachthymnen (from the twilight kingdom) beherit - drawing down the moon master's hammer - ritual drawing down the moon and far away from the sun are my favourites personally.

ya i do.

i just finished watching mullholand drive again - and i all have to talk about is how spectacular the movie is. it's just purely mesmerising...it's hard to wake up from that little world it places you in itself. you simply want to dive right back in. idk, i think lynch perfected his craft - everything he's been working up to at that point with mullholand dr.

hi i recommend 2 u adramelech bye

Boris with Michio Kurihara - Abraçando a névoa nice stuff fates warning - valley of the dolls

what's up guys, hows this topic goin' on?

Esoteric come to mind.

1. I guess this is where we disagree, but maybe it's better to never say. 2. Well, I guess I can see your point about overflowing it with classics (although, I would've stated some 'non-classic' book series if I was arguing in terms of something like that), but I was just doing that because we were speaking of popularity. In regards to stuff where popularity is a non factor, Italo Calvino's "If On A Winter's Night A Traveler", James C (the name escapes me atm) Shogun, Steven Erikson's Malazan series and some of Stephen R. Donaldson's books are all rather good. 3. I agree, lots of them do. I find it rather creepy too, but, that's that. aquariusman: Good, good. You gave it a chance and you even enjoyed yourself!

1. Wasn't directed at you, but alright (but I understand how you might've thought it could've been directed at you). Good for you, you gave it a chance, moreso than most of the people discrediting the book can say. I commend you, I really do. 2. I think discrediting a classic (which that in itself usually means its a rather popular piece) is a much stronger way of "hating the popular", much better than calling a children's book sh*t (thus the strong response when I called LOTR [cabbage]!). I think I attacked your point quite fine, unless you were looking for something in the sense of modern literature? Regardless, I could list every book I enjoy from these "literary gods" - and I'd still be saying the same thing. I don't know what more you want from me? 3. In your own words, that "is a poor way to go about arguing"? I think so. "Every girl who reads Twilight wants an Edward" is quite the point to prove, but it's simply not true. I could agree that many do, but not all.

I adore Paradise Lost, Kafka's work, H.P Lovecraft's work, Don Quixote (it's even better when read in Spanish), Faulkner's work, Tolstoy's work, and Heart of Darkness, amongst others. Last time I checked, these were pretty popular pieces of literature...but I guess I've been in a grand delusion, eh? Anyways, if you really want an explanation, I'll prepare you a self-made one...instead of looking up "Harry Potter Sucks" and using others arguments for it, and pretending I've read/know the books. Even worse is outright stating you haven't read it and then calling it bad. At least have the decency to read it... Btw, 2 girls really constitutes "every girl" huh?

Haven't you heard? Every girl who likes Twilight wants an Edward. Every guy who likes it wants one too. Also, Twilight's purpose, obviously, was to be compared to books like LOTR and Harry Potter, despite...major differences in....everything. Regardless, I guess we're rest assured now that Twilight is indeed serious business. oh please i loathe all 3 of the mentioned series(ES?!): yeah twilight sucks, lotr sucks, harry potter sucks, but, i don't argue on and on about it. stick to your books, let them stick to their books - as i do you guys without picking apart every book series mentioned. its books, if they want to waste their time reading 400 some pages about edward and bella cuddling, okay, then let them. i highly doubt books such as artemis fowl or harry potter really offer any progression from that, so i think, but, forget about it. cause this is getting rather dumb lol. so please, your literary highness, tell us which books ARENT crap. everything on my shelf, you knave. i am very glad that you recognize my superiority though, it's always good to get recognition for my hard, strenuous years of reading. ;)

Haven't you heard? Every girl who likes Twilight wants an Edward. Every guy who likes it wants one too. Also, Twilight's purpose, obviously, was to be compared to books like LOTR and Harry Potter, despite...major differences in....everything. Regardless, I guess we're rest assured now that Twilight is indeed serious business. oh please i loathe all 3 of the mentioned series(ES?!): yeah twilight sucks, lotr sucks, harry potter sucks, but, i don't argue on and on about it. stick to your books, let them stick to their books - as i do you guys without picking apart every book series mentioned. its books, if they want to waste their time reading 400 some pages about edward and bella cuddling, okay, then let them. i highly doubt books such as artemis fowl or harry potter really offer any progression from that, so i think, but, forget about it. cause this is getting rather dumb lol.

he certainly wasn't a bad writer, rather too ambitious for his own good with lots and lots of filler. Well, i think we've discussed twilight as deeply as we could, so we can only diverge from the topic. :D

lol Tolkien was such a boring and pretentious writer My sarcasm detector is beeping, but that may be because it's out of batteries. If you were serious, to each his own. At least LotR is generally accepted as good, while Twilight...Is not... no, i'm serious, i'd rather pop out war and peace or a kafka book. regardless; yeah, twilight sucks.

lol Tolkien was such a boring and pretentious writer