Assume Nothing

There's nothing to look into, because there's nothing there. If we go by reality by reality's terms, there has been zero evidence of anything that proves the supernatural/metaphysical/paranormal. You're also in no authority to belittle others. It's a laughable attempt at discrediting argument though. EDIT - I like how you choose metaphors that lack any relevance.

I don't believe in the supernatural, metaphysical, or the paranormal. There has never been conclusive evidence of it, despite thousands of years of the existence of the hypothesis. One could reasonably conclude that if it's as prevalent as it is claimed to be, that there would be something confirming its existence by now. There's no reason why that could not be the case, so it's pretty safe to say that they don't exist. Do ghosts matter to us, if they did exist?

Banned for lacking the elegance of the female form.

Banned for suggesting that others would fall for that trick. It's very easy to manipulate. The quote button.

Relieving oneself after holding it for a long time. Please do not manipulate the context.

Banned for being the cause of his ban.

I don't think a hypothesis could be put forth that could contradict it, therefore making the idea unfalsifiable and ultimately redundant. I'm not sure what relevance it has on morality though, care to explain?

Banned for failing to provide a relevant reason.

The end-game is far superior to the mid-level game. In RuneScape, it really isn't about the journey there - it's about the destination. In terms of bosshunting, I can list next to no 'exciting' monsters. I guess you can argue that mid-level dungeoneering at approx level 90+ is quality content. It is a bit limited in scope though, I must admit.

Banned for abusing the English language.

The only animals I've seen here in Manchester are cats and pidgeons :D Why are there so many Chinese type Asians in Manchester? You might find your answer by reading into history.

Banned for watching food-porn. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h0V_hev1wY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sE5rgu38ltY

Banned for being homo-sapien.

It may be a good idea to do the recording first, and put in the commentary after. The lack of editing makes it a cumbersome task to watch an extended fight.

Banned for misunderstanding science. It's a reflection, and it's not my eye. It's my avatar's eye.

Heartless, maybe. Crazy, I'd argue with that. It depends though. Why aren't family members deserving of the same punishment that everyone else gets for committing a crime, regardless of its inherent frivolous nature? If we assume they're loving, caring, nurturing family members who have provided, cleaned, and educated, then I'd agree with you. This is clearly not the case here - rather, he's obligated to live with them out of a lack of choice, and frequently gets abused physically, psychologically and financially. Is it really that bad to let the justice system penalize them for whatever they've done? If they didn't do it, then what have they got to fear? I'm rather tired of the lenient attitude on domestic abuse. It's the cause of many societal problems, yet we do not realize that for some inane reason. On a slightly more relevant note: Today, I've lost my passport. Huzzah. EDIT - I've just realized that he's an Aussie. I'm sure petty theft can still be convicted with a fine, or 100hr+ of community service.

Why not? His family has a track record of being abusive, according to himself. The main objective is to move away from them as soon as possible, surely.

I'm pretty sure theft goes against federal law, even if it's petty. You're in the US, right? Open a lawsuit or something.

That argument may apply for racial discrimination, disability discrimination, etc. It's more or less irrelevant when it comes to this perceived intelligence thing, unless it's not from just his personal social circles.

If they're not forced into it through exploitation - but rather, through financial pressure... does that make it immoral? You have to factor in all the diseases they could get too.

Is it moral to hire a prostitute, or a stripper?

I shall safely presume that you don't actually need the money - you merely want it. Do you have rent, living expenses, utility bills, etc. to pay? Oh, the irony at my name. Then again, I'd argue that it's safe enough to be assumed.

Jagex's track record with "fixing" content says otherwise. I am with Zerker Jane and I am not even a pker, I just don't trust Jagex to come with a better solution for the current system. I do apologize for the misinterpreted quote.

Banned for asserting that I've requested any proof.

Banned for providing insufficient proof. It does not suggest that I claimed to be the highest order of authority.