Romy

Although, as stated, it's probably from the warriors' guild, the emote is a rather nice idea :lol: .

If you expect to see the unexpected... Isn't that expected? Also, what's the Dragon pickaxe's special?

But then you didn't merge them #-o ... what's the point?

Not true. Jagex has very smart detectors, they'd get banned before they can even get a nice sum of money. (And by the way, even if that wasn't true, they could still do that on other skills so it doesn't really change anything.)

It's either a quest coming out (which I doubt, it makes more sense they'd release it all together), a skill (probably Sailing, makes more sense than a quest, but meh...), or old content leftout... Or a teaser? Jee... I don't know :S.

The ditch was never useful. Now it's even less. As for the essence, it's true that the reason pure essence was brought into the game is a problem that is already solved, but removing it would cause other problems.

After that, you say you could see nothing was coming from it, but do you not see, that was a conversation, and it had started. Anyway, i'm going to merge this with the 'Noobs say the funniest things!' thread as it will die out quickly if i don't. Somewhere along the lines, I did say I got what I paid for.

There I was, at the Grand Exchange, raising my Cooking levels along with some friends, when I notice a level 14 female shouting out "Selling a conversation, 5K!" constantly. At first I ignored it, I barely even paid any attention to her, not to mention even considering to give her the cash she was asking for (I was always known for my attitude towards freeloaders, I think each person should earn his own bread). After a while, my curiousity started to itch. I was interested enough to ask her this: "Can I get an explanation of the product before I purchase?" "Yes, after you pay me the money, I'll reward you with a conversation to interest you for serveral minutes, including any topic you could possibly think of. Including my ongoing goal to complete Dragon Slayer." Curiousity could not let go of me, and as much as I hate freeloaders, I eventualy gave up and paid the small sum, not before asking if she is obligated to interest me thoughout the whole conversation. For a few seconds, none of us spoke a word. I was waiting for her to suggest a topic, and she was waiting for me. "Go ahead, pick a topic." she said. "Any suggestions? It's your job after all." "Costumers are supposed to pick topics." "It seems more reasonable to me that if I can't pick a topic, you'd suggest it. And besides, who said costumers are supposed to come up with a topic?" "The contract says so." "I don't remember signing no contract." "Oh, you did, just a few minutes ago, don't you remember?" At this point, I realised nothing would come out of it, and as though as it may only be 5K gp, the feeling that the service was not granted annoyed me. "I obviously did not sign any contract." I answered, hoping to might still get something out of it. "You did, don't you remember? you should see a doctor." "Well, I don't. You better come up with a topic, scammer." I said, giggling a little. The girl apparently paniced, she was certain that I'm about to report her (even though it never crossed my mind before), and had begged me not to. I figured I'd ride the train she set, and said she should come up with a topic. "Perhaps we could talk about how I didn't scam you? Or about scamming generally?" She asked, hoping for a positive response. "That's not very interesting in my opinion." "What is your favorite animal?" she asked desperately. "Dogs, I guess." She had some smarts, because instead of agreeing with me, she automaticly picked the other side of the equation. I believe she would have done that no matter what animal I suggested. "Dogs are cold blood murderers! And they're so dumb!" I decided to play along, let her show me her conversing abilities. "What?! dogs are loving and trustful!" "Dogs are vile and stupid!" I don't recall exactly how the conversation went at this point, but I remember she tried to contradict anything I said. At some point, she ran out of answers, and I wasn't so eager to continue the mindless conversation either. I figured she would panic again- but then- "Your time is running out." "I did not enjoy one second of the conversation. Rubbish scammer!" "It's a shame- no refunds." "I couldn't care less for 5K, I only want the service I paid for." I saw myself with a goal- either reach an interesting conversation, or make her admit a mistake. "You paid for a conversation, and that's what you got." "I paid for a service meant to interest and entertain me. I don't recall getting one." Her nervous bone started to ache apparently, as she wouldn't let me end the conversation without the feeling of satisfaction. "Look, you're right. If you want your money back, you can have it." I didn't want my money back. Both because it was a useless sum, and because she did deserve it- After all, I got my conversation. "I don't want my money back, I want the service I paid you for." In the end, she kept shouting out "Selling a conversation, 5K!" and I ended up with a good laugh. The bare thought of someone struggling so hard to entertain me is hilarious, not to mention she did have a rather sarcastic sense of humour (on the full, about 5-6 times longer, conversation, not the one presented to you here), and I got the service I was looking for. So maybe a few years ago "Dancing for money!" or "Looking for a job!" were popular by beggars, but they got creative (or perhaps it was just this specific player). Where will it go from here? Advice selling? Guidance for real life? Perhaps nothing will happen at all, and I'm just illusinating. What ever it may be, seeing the very unusual "Selling a conversation" line out on the Grand Exchange was certainly thought-provoking. Your thoughts?

Had the exact same dillemma, ended up voting for Excl! Which is going to win anyways... \

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Yes, , but . The numbers are different depending on whether x increases towards 0 or decreases towards 0; the limit is not equal on both sides. Sure, you could go ahead and create an 'unsigned' infinity and use the real projective line, but since this isn't a field division doesn't even keep the meaning that you're probably familiar with in it. (forgive the dodgy Latex; it's the first thing Google spat out) What perfec doesn't understand is, that infinite isn't necessarily such a large number. For example, between 0 to 1, there are infinite numbers. In addition, between 1 and 2 there are also infinit numbers. Now, even though infinite, you must agree that the infinity between 0 to 1 isn't as big as the infinity between 0 to 3, not to mention 0 to say... 1M. In conclusion, although infinite cannot be measured, there are sizes to it, and you can't say that 0 is bigger than 3, 64, or 1,000 only because it's infinite. I am not going into the intimate details of infinite but from my understanding of it is never ending, so your saying there is a never ending list of numbers between 0 and 1? :shame: There might be googolplexian or more numbers between them but you would eventually get to 1. I think of it like and FPS, if you have infinite ammo, there isn't an enormous amount of it, there is no limit. [/hide] Of course there are infinite numbers between 1 and 0. You can add as many numbers after the dot, and will still not get 1, as long as before the dot there is a 0. examples: 0.1 0.000000000000000000000000000006 0.1567863542135498756423545778995461 0.09 0.0000000000000000000500000000000000000000000000000001 These are not even close to the length these numbers can get to. Haven't you ever been to school? It's pretty much basic stuff... Do you not know what googolplexian is? cos I pretty much said exactly what you just said except, I think that if you counted these numbers for millennia then you would eventually get to 1 from 0, which to me means it isn't infinite. You're totaly, 100% wrong. No matter for how long you count, whether it be a year, 50 years, or over 9999999999999999999 years, you will never, EVER count all of the numbers between 1-2, simply because those are infinite. You wouldn't even know where to start counting, simply because even the "smallest" number after 1, or the "biggest" before 2, is unlimited. Now let's try to find the smallest number after 1 (an impossible task): 1.1 - difinately not. 1.01? 1.000000000000000000000000000000001? 1.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001? We can go for ever with this, you can always add 1 more digit before the "1" at the end, there is not restrict to it. This is the simplest explanation I could think of, I hope it's satisfying.

[hide=Wall of quotes] aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Yes, , but . The numbers are different depending on whether x increases towards 0 or decreases towards 0; the limit is not equal on both sides. Sure, you could go ahead and create an 'unsigned' infinity and use the real projective line, but since this isn't a field division doesn't even keep the meaning that you're probably familiar with in it. (forgive the dodgy Latex; it's the first thing Google spat out) What perfec doesn't understand is, that infinite isn't necessarily such a large number. For example, between 0 to 1, there are infinite numbers. In addition, between 1 and 2 there are also infinit numbers. Now, even though infinite, you must agree that the infinity between 0 to 1 isn't as big as the infinity between 0 to 3, not to mention 0 to say... 1M. In conclusion, although infinite cannot be measured, there are sizes to it, and you can't say that 0 is bigger than 3, 64, or 1,000 only because it's infinite. I am not going into the intimate details of infinite but from my understanding of it is never ending, so your saying there is a never ending list of numbers between 0 and 1? :shame: There might be googolplexian or more numbers between them but you would eventually get to 1. I think of it like and FPS, if you have infinite ammo, there isn't an enormous amount of it, there is no limit. [/hide] Of course there are infinite numbers between 1 and 0. You can add as many numbers after the dot, and will still not get 1, as long as before the dot there is a 0. examples: 0.1 0.000000000000000000000000000006 0.1567863542135498756423545778995461 0.09 0.0000000000000000000500000000000000000000000000000001 These are not even close to the length these numbers can get to. Haven't you ever been to school? It's pretty much basic stuff...

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Yes, , but . The numbers are different depending on whether x increases towards 0 or decreases towards 0; the limit is not equal on both sides. Sure, you could go ahead and create an 'unsigned' infinity and use the real projective line, but since this isn't a field division doesn't even keep the meaning that you're probably familiar with in it. (forgive the dodgy Latex; it's the first thing Google spat out) What perfec doesn't understand is, that infinite isn't necessarily such a large number. For example, between 0 to 1, there are infinite numbers. In addition, between 1 and 2 there are also infinit numbers. Now, even though infinite, you must agree that the infinity between 0 to 1 isn't as big as the infinity between 0 to 3, not to mention 0 to say... 1M. In conclusion, although infinite cannot be measured, there are sizes to it, and you can't say that 0 is bigger than 3, 64, or 1,000 only because it's infinite.

Please, try to be original. Over 9017. Now THAT's original.

I don't want the suit. I want the emotes.

If you have a costume room in your house, put it there. You never know, and you're better off dropping it after you get the emotes, just in case. I'm a free player, and need the bank space... Should I still drop it?

K, thanks guys. I'm dropping my Zombie suit then.

I haven't played RuneScape in quite a while, and heard (or read...) that as of 25th of February 2009, Leo the Gravedigger event, occurs even without burying bones. In addition, rewards are given differently (through a box). My question is - Can I get the emotes WITHOUT getting the outfit first? (Unlike before?)

Nope, impossible. Dividing by 0 is just like saying... 101% of the world's population hates the taste of gas. You can phisically say it, but it means absolutly nothing, as it's not possible. Sort of like saying "A Dragon told me I should get some sleep." see my point?

It's not a "useless RuneScape fact", it's a question. I'm not pointing out that his cape is trimmed, I'm asking why, hoping for a good answer. It is that way so it can be on the ""~~**Useless Runescape Facts**~~ 75,000+ views! 1k+ Replies!" thread. Jagex just did that to see how many people would notice. Consider it an easter egg.. one right out in the open. No, on this thread you post facts about the game, that do not "matter". I did not post a fact, I asked for the reason it's there. See the difference? Fact, question.

He should still be getting his 99 capes though. That make since. If that's not true, then you should only be able to get your drivers' liscense when you're at the exact right age. Not before, not after. Thanks for missing what the joke was about. Way to go. :thumbup: Ooh thanks! I feel special :D!

He should still be getting his 99 capes though. That makes sense. If that's not true, then you should only be able to get your drivers' liscense when you're at the exact right age. Not before, not after.

It's not a "useless RuneScape fact", it's a question. I'm not pointing out that his cape is trimmed, I'm asking why, hoping for a good answer.

Why does the FireMaking master have a trimmed cape? Why is he the only master that does? (Especialy considering Duradel's Combat level Implies that he should have atleast one more 99 skill, yet his cape isn't).

Kalphites are the ONLY Slayer monster that can be assigned by any Slayer master.

Actualy, your max hit stops at 98. 99 is only for cape/ total level/ High Scores Purposes.