Sy_Accursed

This theory has been proved wrong by science before. Yes the right side of the brain processes creativity and controls the left of the body; but there's been no proof of correlation between motor control and other functions of that hemisphere. The only difference is a right handed artist has more activity across the entire brain as they are using the right to be arty and the left to output this; while left handed have more intense brain activity but only in the right hemisphere as this half of the brain is dealing with both the creative process and the motor impulses necessary for output. I read something a while back that I found intriguing that right-handed artists would in fact have the potential to be better artists, as they can reach highly levels of creativity stimulation AND motor output simultaneously as each function has access to the full capacity of it's hemisphere. Where as the left-handed artist at their peak would have to ration their capacity (70:30, 50:50 or w/e) between creative and motor.

Guess there's no database that's accurate that is easily google-able then. DGS or someone should really put one together, though the wiki format of x > y > z deffo seems better as it allows for second best if user lacks that attack style or easy access to it. and could obviously include notes to say this monster has low defence so it doesn't really matter etc.

Fair enough, definitely would be a useful addition imo. Though at least some explanation of how you work out the starting position would be good; since it seems there may be a fairly reliable way.

Seems I just got which ones show up in red reversed, still same rough principle though as Green covered very nicely.

I only posted the rswiki link as reference of what the op had already said he had found and was using. I googled it after someone mentioned there were databases and happened upon it shortly after the op said he was using it. Only other one I found is this one: http://www.runeslayer.com/skills/dungeoneering/monsters/index.php Seems pretty good based on what other's have said, missing warped monsters though and the slayer ones all say unknown.

If the rswiki source isn't good enough why have you all happily let the op trot off using it as his guide rather than pointing him to a better one?

Undeads aren't weak to crush, that advice is confusing at best. As for forgotten warriors, those should be crushed at last resort, so if there are any people with a csb, they shouldn't be crushed. So yeah, basically, your advice was very much terrible... He asked which to crush and slash. Of the choices its better to crush forgotten warriors. Also sticking with assuming only crush/slash as options: Ghosts Skeletons Crawling Hands Spiritual Guardians Are all undead where crush is better. Only zombies and Nechs are better to slash (going from tht wiki list).

Perhaps in the context of the average scaper, your advice is good. But DGS is here, so your advice is not in this context. Yeah I'm not saying it was the best advice ever and totally expected others to probably have better answers. Just don't think its fair to slam my advice entirely given it is true forgotten worries and undead do make up a fair portion of the list.

For other people's sake who may search this I believe this is the list he found: http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/Dungeoneering/Monsters And skimming through it I don't see how my advice was that bad; undead do take fair slice of the crush weaknesses. But yeah deffo seems more than I was aware of benefit from crush attack use, particularly in the higher floors.

Well its advice I've seen repeated elsewhere many times, including these forums, and from personal experience it had worked just fine so far. But please if it so wrong please do post better advice.

tbh you can jsut leave it on slash from pretty much everything aside from forgotten warriors (the higher level ones) and a few undead ones (i forget quite which though)

I read what you said, I just pointed out the grammatical form of the BTS around the bit you bolded made it clearly it referred to Ariane, Ozan and Sir Owen as appearing elsewhere and not Marmaros etc.

Ungrounded idea given it says the three hero npcs, Ariane, Ozan and Sir Owen, we been told about ages ago will make their first appearance in-game AND wander around elsewhere. It doesn't even remotely imply the dg guys will wander off. I was more so referring to the fact that they look alike, not that they're the same person. Having not played for real since the bonus xp weekend, I think it was fair guess to make. Aside from the grammatical structure of the bts clearly indicating it referred to Ariane, Ozan and Sir Owen; not the other names previously passed by...

Ungrounded idea given it says the three hero npcs, Ariane, Ozan and Sir Owen, we been told about ages ago will make their first appearance in-game AND wander around elsewhere. It doesn't even remotely imply the dg guys will wander off.

I reckon u did 31 twice. First time ticked 31 and gave the lvl 31 base xp. Second time it ticked off 30 hence lower base xp and thus lower overall xp

The only time something comes up in red IIRC is the relatively new feature where it gives u the base xp for a lower floor (of the same theme) that you have yet to tick off since last reset. This implies despite what you said you did not complete floor 30 as floor 31 has given you the floor 30 base xp, meaning it was not ticked off.

Yeah death hates that have an emote that make u turn into a statue and 1 of which relates to pking (paraphrasing from bts) Picture of a guy wearing a hat with a skull on it in edgevile (like pker capital) beside a statue that wears the same hat; pretty obvious its for the hats.

I like this idea (dont think i remembered the mention that) But it should be sort of an extreme limiter. Eg if odds of drop are 1 in 5000 it shuldnt guarantee the drop til u get to at least 10,000 if not more; just to ensure it is only catching the really extreme cases of useless luck.

The trouble with randomness is it inevitably that it randomly favours some over others; that is the nature of random selection. Say nymph has a 1/5000 chance of showing up and everytime you get xp it generates a number from 1 - 10,000 with 4000 and 8000 being assigned as "wins" It's not "broken" that someone happens to get nymph 6 times in 300k xp (aka 300 successful mines) while others only get it once in the same time. Just sheer luck that you generated 4000 or 8000 that many times. Same as rolling a 100% fair dice as a drinking game and drinking on say a 6. Its inevitable someone is gonna get more 6s much faster than others. Or drawing names randomly from a hat to form two teams. It is inevitable one team is gonna be favour and get more suitable ppl for the team. For two or more parties to come out even close to equal from random selection is the statistically unlikely outcome.

yeah god eggs are insanely common. You usually get atleast 3 a week from mtk

Trolls don't stick around after they're caught, right? Apprently they reoccur thou this guy predict rapture in 1994 prioer to this 2011 one. Based on this i expect rapture take 3 will be in 2028

Well the trees are a separate project and you get blue fog if u turn down graphics settings; they nvr use full hd for teasrer pics

i didn't think mud runes sold tht well given that we can get a mud staff pretty cheap.

the 4 horses are apocalypse colored iirc. Black, brown, reddish and white

There usually like 20 earthquakes a day in the world most barely register and anything below 7.0 isn't considered anything major since at worst it feels a little trembley and a few roof tiles might fall off. Considering this is meant to be a rapture where each place has an earthquake that makes japan look tame (that was a 12.0) at 6pm local time and so far we have a good chunk of asia passing 6pm with jack [cabbage]e happening.