Lionheart_0

Well my english class had a discussion on wether evil is in everyone or not. But i came up with a third option. Is there even such a thing as evil? I think not. How can there be? That would mean there were set rules to life, and that one thing is good, and one thing is bad. But how does that work? Look at terrorists. They feel it is alright to kill others for pleasure, and to make others feel pain. But most others think its bad to do these deads. Now this is the thing, are terrorists evil? I dont think they are. They are people that are doing what they think is right, and just so happens we dont like what they do, so we fight back. Its all about perception. We are brought up thinking things are right and wrong, when in reality, it matters what we belive. Thats my thoughts, what about all yours?

:shock: i just had a thing today for awards, perahps we go to the same school? Anyways, i dotn get jelouse. I have a few times, but i try and think of it as a bad thing to do and jus ttry not to be jelouse. I think its quite a stupid feeling to feel. Almost like being greedy... which i think is stupid.

But: One could take it into consideration, and change the working enviornment, or make a job where this person cannot do any of the killing. You may not be trusting them, but your giving them a chance. Edit: and placing them under some restrictions. I dotn belive in compleat jail at all (unless they enjoy it). As long as a person has some freedoms, i dont think yor passing compleat judgment.

The past does not matter, because it is the present you are at now... Anyways, no, no one should be judged on their past, but as Jackalope said, it can be taken into consideration when trusting someone.

no but his "master race" was blonde hair and blue eyes i believe. ^Correctly said.

:? Thats a poor answer to me. It does not really say imperialism, cause i dont think its actuly proven that they were only after the oil, and anyways, its not imperialism because iraq is still its own country, and not part of the US. Britan is a more Grade A example. It had an empire all over the world.

meh, if you bought the premium box, just play your original xbox stuff.

Edit:MODS PLZ LEAVE THIS UP! THIS IS TO DISCUSS ABOUT THE SERIES HAVING TO DO WITH RACISM, NOT ABOUT THE MOVIE ITSELF! Ok i just saw the movie today, and some things ran through my head as i watched it... Is the harry potter series all about racism? Thing 1. Draco's father, his hair colour is blond, and he hates muggles... sounds like another person in history who, may not of had blond hair (although liked blond haired people), was very racists and created WW2. Hittler. Yes it occured to me when i saw him, and i remembered how he hated muggles... and his blond hair. Thing 2. The death eaters costume, look at the hat. What does it resemble? (I cant find any picture of the death eater hat so i wont compare). But it looks like a KKK hat... Once again rascism. The group hates muggles, and the kkk's hate a certain type of people as well... Is this coincidence... i dont know. If one reads the whole series of the book, there are diffrent events that bring both sides together (in the new book, fudge comes to talk to the priminister to talk about both the magic and muggle world. Unusal). Your opinions?

Im glad someone takes my side, and i havent seen the mention of evil (dont think it exists). Here is a quote i once read "The love a country makes the hate of another". Basicly, for everything a person likes, another hates it, and some go as for as to try and dystroy it, or take action.... There will always be one with the other... (Also about the bird flu thing, i think thats a terrible thing to think! also its bad, cause like remember the concert in toronto? after sars? well that made toronto over 100 million in debt... i dont think id like the killing to get everyone together... if i would have to pay that...

I did like the story, but... i dont think the tip.it times should be used for story telling... but thats just me, and i aint the editor.

You missed the point again. He's speaking theoretically. :oops: :oops: oppps... kinda missed that.

Actually, it doesn't require absolute knowledge to prove there is a God, while it is required to prove there is no God. It's the difference between a positive universal claim and a negative universal claim. Imagine the universe as a room, and you want to prove that there is a spider in the room. If you want to prove the spider's presence, you only have to know one part of the room - the part where the spider is. However, if you wish to prove that there is no spider in the room, you must know every nook and crany of the room, lest the spider be hiding in some unknown corner. It's the same thing with God. To prove the existence of God, one would only have to have knowledge of one place where God is. But to prove that there is no God, one would have to know every bit of reality (be omniscient), lest God be in some far reach of the universe that man doesn't know about. Therefore, to say that there absolutely is no God is to claim omniscience. However, if you were omniscient, you'd probally fit the definition of God, hence proving that there is a God. Ya but your thinking physical, god is sappoused to be spiritual, is it not? It's really irrelevant to the point he's trying to prove. He's saying that if you can establish the existence of God, then you don't need to know all of reality to prove it, because you've already shown God to exist. However to show God *not* to exist - then you need to show *everywhere* God is not. Get it? There He is! Stop searching. There He isn't, keep going until you've searched everything. :? No acutly the point i made was valid, cause there is no proof at all that a god exists, therefore what he siad didnt make sense. Cause what if you say there is a spider is in the room, yet you cant see the spider at all, but you still feel that its there... theres no proof that a spiders there, only a feeling, and a bleif.

:lol: today in waterpolo, i used my leges to kick so much that ended up getting a major cramp in my leg, never had oen before... it hurts :x

Which of the two do you usually complete it in more often? 3 minutes=180 seconds

playing video games, and listening/playing music.

Actually, it doesn't require absolute knowledge to prove there is a God, while it is required to prove there is no God. It's the difference between a positive universal claim and a negative universal claim. Imagine the universe as a room, and you want to prove that there is a spider in the room. If you want to prove the spider's presence, you only have to know one part of the room - the part where the spider is. However, if you wish to prove that there is no spider in the room, you must know every nook and crany of the room, lest the spider be hiding in some unknown corner. It's the same thing with God. To prove the existence of God, one would only have to have knowledge of one place where God is. But to prove that there is no God, one would have to know every bit of reality (be omniscient), lest God be in some far reach of the universe that man doesn't know about. Therefore, to say that there absolutely is no God is to claim omniscience. However, if you were omniscient, you'd probally fit the definition of God, hence proving that there is a God. Ya but your thinking physical, god is sappoused to be spiritual, is it not?

everything has a beggining and an end in this universe, so its kinda natural for us to get born, and then die :lol:

:roll: in your logic then, christains dont exist cause they dont have ultimate proof that a good exists. Its all about belifes.

:o I'd love to have one of these! always wanted one!

How can you say that? You're hitting puberty, you're getting sexual urges to people and obscure things, you're body's completely changing, your hormones are all over the place. Less emotional? Mate you're near your emotional peak when you reach this stage. Albeit, not everyone reaches it at 13, but until then you're still into cooties and what not anyway. Less emotional...that's total turd pal. :? am i just gereralizing now or what? im helluva lot more less emotional then when i was like 12, and that was only 3 years ago... And im not talking about sexual urgues, and asking out every girl you meet, im saying think things through, but dotn go your adolcent live without experience dating.

??? i thought the thing didnt effect humans :shock: ???

:? Most people dont get this... it is THE perfect time to date, cause your less emotional at the time. And the reason i say its the perfect time... is because since people arnt as emotional, i think its a better time for them to have a failed relationships cause then after its over, they can think "Ok what did i do wrong, and i know that i dont want to go out i with people like that, what can i do to make it better". This is best cause then you keep going till one sticks and then you will deffinitly know that the person is the right one.

:shock: dude you only just got to these boards, and i think your gonna be a good person on these boards! You have an awsome name and good tast in games.

Ya... dont listen to the guys who constantly who say your to young and what not, as someone already said it, its the right age to start practe going out. But, i really doubt you love her... i thought i loved once... it was acutly just a fake feeling i had, and was only a crush.

The Pokemon show is anime. :? Hmm so you are right, i was alwasy told that they were not anime, just stuff that looks like anime. LMAO i found this intresting link, and perhps make some people mroe mad! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pok%C3%A9mon_Diamond_and_Pearl