Lovelydude

What do you think gameshows are for? I hate when people are always in a rush for no real reason. Even worse is when people are in rush and get angry at others as if it will speed up their progress.

Ah, it is so easy to comment on the activism of others, yet I've seen first hand, some very aware people wake up in the morning and they care not of any global problems, because their awareness is shrouded by what they're going to do that day. Is it wrong to focus on the positive rather than the negative? People who protest cruelty against puppies and remain unaware, or disregard other problems, like illegal hunting, are annoying. They share sympathy for the animals because of their appearance or disposition, not because of their own morality.

:twisted: That's a bit silly Tigra, would what we eat D: :twisted: Does my addition of smilies mean anything to you?

Defender, you should be a car salesman.

:lol:

You didn't answer my question, what's your basis for it? I'll admit that I value a human's life over an animal's but why does that mean we shouldn't work towards better conditions and the removal of injustice for both? Let me ask you.. what if it was your future daughter? Just sit and think about it.. your her guardian.. her parent. Its up to you to keep her safe and protect her. But theives come in and take her, and constantly being to [assault] her, eventually becoming a slave. Would you still think about animal rights? ~Defender~ How was that answering his question? It's just using your own emotionally charged outlook to avoid it and come back to something you think will sway him. I think it's obvious no one would wish your hypothetical on anyone and if it happened to one of us, we'd be dead keen to see the ordeal over. Does that mean we have to be anti-cow militants too? keep pointing fingers warrior, he didn't answer my question either. Mind your own business, this debate is with me and him. Go insult someone else on this topic. Yes Or No Assasin? ~Defender~ Don't be stupid. Your question was circumstancial and rhetorical.

Ok, ok. I just realised the irony in my last post, but it still stands that when people disagree with your opinion mainly to be provocative, one can't help but be annoyed. Defender this is not a question of priorites. I understand how you might interpret that, though I think pretty much every statement made on that front in this thread has been possibly misleading or without explanation regarding both animal and human traffiking and cruelty. For the record. I am against both problems, however I have little or no preference as to which holds more importance.

We should all care less for animals and more for humans. When there are no injustices among humans let's start caring for the animals. I can promise that I'll protest for the mosquito's right to suck blood when all humans are treated with dignity, fairness and respect. No need to be an [wagon]. I never said animal rights are more important than human rights and I most certainly never labelled human rights insignificant. You seem to do that to animals though. [wagon]. He wasn't acting like a "wagon". He only has an opinion that is different than yours. In fact, you seem to be the one acting hostile towards him. And a little bit of FYI: Humans > Animals I clearly stated my opinion, which he read into incorrectly (or at least provocatively), and deliberately so I think. I daresay you of all people could sympathise with one getting annoyed when someone reads their post/opinion the wrong way.

People have necks. Rather long ones too.

We should all care less for animals and more for humans. When there are no injustices among humans let's start caring for the animals. I can promise that I'll protest for the mosquito's right to suck blood when all humans are treated with dignity, fairness and respect. No need to be an [wagon]. I never said animal rights are more important than human rights and I most certainly never labelled human rights insignificant. You seem to do that to animals though. [wagon].

Is it that wrong to try and put things into perspective or prioritise? I'm sure he's not annoyed with what they are fighting for per se, he's just making a comparison to show how inhumane we are to ourselves. Not it's perfectly just, but he didn't need to go so far as to state that animal cruelty protestors were annoying and that their cause is nothing compared to that of the victims of slave trade.

Just to reiterate. You are on par with those protestors because; you call yourself compassionate yet you care not of problems right in front of you. Also, the animal cruelty issue is something we all can help fix, we can't all travel to Asia or the Middle East however.

I agree that the entire sex slaves and traffiking problem is horrific, however cruelty to animals is just as bad. Despite your global awareness, you come off just as bad as those kfc protesters.

Hiim, my Mom's leaving on the third to Wisconsin and then Chicago, then around Europe and stopping at Amsterdam to come back to Sydney. Weird. Loaf. Thanks. :D

I must say, I would rather have my emotions left unexplained. The only normal indication of my emotions when nothing happens to trigger them is whether I smile or not. I can't even place that as happy because it's so much more. Yesterday, it was raining and there was a crazy wind. I was walking home from school and I saw the park nearby. All I could focus on was the picnic tables, lubricated by all the rain. I ran to them and practiced certain grinds and cess slides on the picnic tables, it was just exhilarating. Then I went to the little playground area and practiced spins, I did some 720s in crazy rain and wind pushing down on me with my cast on, which leads me to believe I could do 9s. ;D I know that probably sounds really lame, but keep in mind I have a broken hand so I can't even put my skates on, let alone skate. I haven't skated for two weeks now, and I can't skate for another six weeks. D: I have no real words to explain the emotions I felt. All I can say is that it was a blast. Edit: I was at that park in the rain from about two hours. ;P

I'm sorry it had to come to this. YOU'RE ALL IGNORANT FOOLS. There are thousands of people who do far worse things, many times and get away scott free. Paris Hilton is no angel, however you all make it seem like she's the only person ever to do something wrong and get away with it. At least she got hugely televised so she gets plenty of shame and hate her way. I still think she's a [developmentally delayed] though.

Satanists eat babies.

WIMP! ;P

ACK. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0T7nYEb0 ... er&search= It's the creature at the end. Any animal would crap themselves at the sight of this thing.

I really like the concept and pose, however it needs a lot of work. This has tons of potential, so I tell you. REFINEREFINEREFINE.

LOVEBUMP. BABY.

Weeboab, please attempt to be less offensive next time. :\ Zoid, the first is pretty awesome, however with the addition of the black and white features in the second and third sigs, they become so generic and lack emotion. The second would be nice without the hard white and black slapped on. Black and white only works with people when emotion is already portrayed, colour amplifies the emotion too, so stick with it. :D

I have no problem with satanism whatsoever, however I find it rather pointless. Anyone who has gotten to the stage where they would decide to become a satanist doesn't really need any guidance or judgement when it comes to their lives, though unlike many other faith and religious groups, I think we are better off with satanism.

No. Those sources do not relate breasts to sexiness because they decide that's something they should do, they do it because people are attracted to them. :? I understand what you are saying, however in one way or another, they are linked to sexual attraction. Large full breasts = Good woman to get down with, as she can supply plenty of milk to your offspring.