Mirror

On the guide, it says that the north house in East Ardy which is a level 1 requirement gives 3.5 exp. It actually gives me 15 exp. I checked both houses, they both give 15 exp. Thanks!

I heard nuking the kiddie things and I got happy. I can't wait!

N&K here But as some have stated here, the economic view from this would certainly cause inflation beyond my wildest imagination. Personally, I don't have a problem with tradeable rares. I know I will never be able to make it to the value of a party hat, but I am perfectly fine with that. It's a symbol of a game that I once missed (story not going into) and I will always regard it as that. But the problem with this, it's all my view, not what the community wants. It's all what Jagex wants to do. Sadly, I am going to say this, but it's their game. They get to choose what they want to do with the game. Whether that be to listen to their players (which it seems is what they are trying to do now) or follow their own plan, so be it. If the community wants what this topic proposed, then hats off to them if they follow through with such an idea. So now the question is simple yet complicated at the same time, does the community want the current system or a new system? I have heard both views come from this thread, which is arguable that this was bound to be seen in any good discussion, but I think it needs to come down to the economical stand point. It's not a point of wants but rather a point of necessities. Sure some people want hats, but is it feasible? There is a cap, 2.1B to be exact. No gp can go past that, it's a numerical problem with the sequence, not something that is entirely able to be fixed. If the system was created to change all tradeable rares into an influx of gp, then that wealth could be lost by the cap or more likely, put into other products (and this is the inflation). This is following your first (which seems to be the most popular) idea. Following the second idea of just without warning, removing the trade status from the items, I think would cause an uproar from those that are rich enough to have purchased an item of worth. If knowledge was known of the change, some actions would have changed, and money be put into other products, which will still cause inflation, but not at the same rate as the first idea, because some users would still like to purchase the items before the were "discontinued" again, this time from everyone by use of the removal of trade status. I would prefer this method over the first one, due to the impact being lessened rather than being heightened. *Note: Did not talk about the actual first idea. It would have the same economic problems as that of the ideas stated above.* So in conclusion, it's all about the economics and the rares. Wealth needs to be put somewhere and tradeable rares are a great way to put money into things besides the gp. Jagex needs to pick the best economical choice, which I think is to keep it the same. No harm really is being done besides keeping an arguably ever growing want at certain items, but I think that adds to the flavor of this game. I will certainly never be able to hear the word Party Hat the same way again due to this game. And I will always enjoy that. Thanks for the post!

Sorry, I got work at the first time slot, but I'll try and show up for the second one for good ole cabbage picking. :D

Sorry, I have another thing. In the costume room guide, it does not account for the "new" Runecrafting Outfits that are allowed to be stored in the Magical Wardrobe. Each color has it's own slot. Thanks!

I knew I would do something like that. Is there any way to have them all work together? I get so confused sometimes when I do something like this. (I'm just glad it was a level 1, what could have happened if I was given a harder clue? :lol: ) Thank you!

That's the some good stuff there. Props!

Personally, just a little peeved off at this comment: "We are also committed to working with our fans in the RuneScape community to make the game a more enjoyable place to be. We will be running community events, tournaments and JMod participation in-game to provide more support to you and make RuneScape an even better place to be." Now if that means they are directly competing with the TET, well I'm just not fine with that. While this is a competitive field (event hosting (really it is)) it's still almost a stab in the heart. JMods have been coming to events. Is this because they want to join in on the fun or they were taking notes. I've already sent in my inquiry. We'll see...

I didn't see this here on the riddle section, so here you go: I hope I didn't miss it.

If it's true that this got voted down, I am happy. PBS is one example that comes to mind. Having to switch over and then if they had to continue for another 4 months on both versions, would have had cost them money they don't necessarily have. The only major concern in pushing it back to me was not having enough receivers as it said. I don't really care if "someone didn't know" or "they are elderly and don't know how to work it", those aren't valid excuses in my book. Oh well, no need to get fruffled up on this subject now... ;)

Very very nice work. Congratulations! I love the log.

Gotta be pie. I'm a diehard science nerd and Pi(e) rocks Pi(e) you say... :anxious:

Ah, I now see the errors of my ways. I went back and noticed that I did not edit it as I previously thought. My sincerest apologies. It has been rightfully updated now. Edit: Now that I added the points in, I deliberately remember adding them in. Maybe someone took points away, who knows, but I have added your points in at one time or matter. Oh well, let's just hope they disappear again now, shall we?

Simple questions: What's a Rank? *runs away hitting others with the sarcasm mallet*

Here is the structure: Defeat someone up to 5 levels above you == 5 points Defeat someone 6 to 10 levels above you == 10 points Defeat someone more than 10 levels above you == 15 points Defeat someone up to 5 levels below you == 3 Points Defeat someone 6 to 10 levels below you == 2 Points Defeat someone more then 10 levels below you == 1 Points You defeated someone one level below you, so you gained 3 points, which is what I added. I don't know about Jimmy, if you could show me a link where someone deserved different points due to a point error, then please PM me it.

I added points only for the first match, because that is what was decided with rematches (extra duels). I did this back on Jan 12th.

Dang, that's pretty sweet.

You really should get those 3 mining levels to be all skills 70+... :

Legends was ridiculously hard at the time. You're all spoiled, eating and drinking potions during combat! That's what I was thinking... :lol:

I am really excited to see the coming of this quest. Any great quest would be good with me, whether it finishes a story line, introduces a new item, or whatever, just bring it on! :D

Nothing really exciting for me with these updates, I'll probably just being staying with the same interface as usual. Maybe if I get bored, I'll change it. Oh well.

Sorry for doing this, but I can't be doing this right now. Just got really busy, so we'll see if I can get back to fighting. Once again sorry.

I would so love to read the Chronicles again.

You kidding me? I'd get destroyed by your stats. Even with some armor, I think I would get nailed. Just a side question, what IS your def level? Is it 45?

Well I feel it is finally time to start up with some Death Matches. I'm up for anything really, I am very lax in rules. With Summoning: Your combat level is 111. Without Summoning: Your combat level is 104. Those are my combat levels respectively. So yeah, anyone want a piece of this? Always looking to have some fun with you guys. :D