Chocobodude0

OHHHHH, english is not YOUR first language. I see now. I thought you trying to insult my comprehension of the english language. Alright, I won't lie dude, you're just confusing me at this point. But it's whatever. This debateless is factless anyway...

There is NO PROOF of an existence of a God(s). And likewise, there is nothing to disprove the existence of a God either. See what I'm getting at? A factless debate, which is an oxymoron in itself. And I'm sorry for having a misunderstanding, I thought you were referring to religious people as ignorant. The "God works in misterious ways" argument is flawed in the way that it is cryptic, but this was already explained. no problem that happens when english is not you're first language. English is my first language? What that an atempt at an insult? :| And, you just proved my point that you are a flamer, not a debater. Instead of responding to my post on how we can't give you proof of God's existence, because there is none, and how it's the same for disproving God's existence, you insult me. Hell, you don't know what your own belief is, someone had to attempt to help you clarify (but you simply did that so you'd have some little null point regardless). Theological debates are not for you.

And 3.) The Bible is an aproximately 2,000 year old document that has been passed down orally for centuries and translated into hundreds of languages, and has therefore been been tampered with by human interference, putting in things that were not in the original document, or even taking things out. Which does tie into #2 very nicely.

There is NO PROOF of an existence of a God(s). And likewise, there is nothing to disprove the existence of a God either. See what I'm getting at? A factless debate, which is an oxymoron in itself. And I'm sorry for having a misunderstanding, I thought you were referring to religious people as ignorant. The "God works in misterious ways" argument is flawed in the way that it is cryptic, but this was already explained. That has nothing to do with this topic. This about the existence of a God, not about biblical fallibility/infallibility.

Their "ignorance"? You mean what they choose to believe? Looking down on the beliefs of others simply because they aren't yours is "ignorance", no matter what your, or the other persons faith, is. This is a debate, not a flamefest, so it'd be right of you to treat it so, before you make atheists look even worse. :| i will laugh a people who use the "god works in mysteries ways" arguement in all debates and dont contributes with new infomation or facts. i am not making atheists looking worse. as i am not an atheists, i never said i was. don't make asumpsions, that will make you look worse ;) and i am not looking down on any religion, as i got over 10 muslims friends and my family is christian. also i am not flaming anyone, i am debating, but so far they have yet to show me any "facts". show me facts or stop talking -.- This is a "Is God real or not" debate, easily the most rediculous debate of all time, because there are no facts, for either side. You wanna debate something where there's facts? Don't debate theological matters. That's great you have friends that practice Islam, and a Christian family. You still don't come off tolerate calling people who believe in God ignorant. I'm sorry for jumping the gun and simply assuming what your faith is. And out of curisoty, what is you religion/belief?

As an Atheist, I would avoid making nthose kind of arguments. These kind of weak arguments which question the nature of God will only lead to a form of 'God works in mysterious ways' or some weak possible reason for his actions. Questioning the nature of God gives the religous the upper hand because they are able to invent a theoretical reason (or use a previously invented reason) which cannot be disputed because further reasons, especially self-enforcing (cyclic) reason can be used to 'back up' their point and it'll make them feel awfully smug. Also questioning the nature of God can accept the possiblity that he exists. Basically tread carefully when asking those questions it can lead you into awkward situations where you ask such a question and the religous can make an answer of his choice up. They will always have an (invented) answer. It doesn't really get anybody anywhere. well if thats there best counter arguement, i can laugh at there ignorance :lol: and my question still stand, and it's a good arguement for that god don't exist or is "good". if you look at my post on this page, i am getting better and better soon i will become god almighty! muhahaha. so evi... i mean good! Their "ignorance"? You mean what they choose to believe? Looking down on the beliefs of others simply because they aren't yours is "ignorance", no matter what your, or the other persons faith, is. This is a debate, not a flamefest, so it'd be right of you to treat it so, before you make atheists look even worse. :|

If what you say is true, then people have no right to brag it up as an "amazing movie" because it's simplicity is purely for entertainment and has no other value. Amazing movies only come along every so often, and The Dark Knight sadly is not even CLOSE to an amazing movie. Good? Yes. Amazing? No. What? It's far from simple. Just because the movie lacks realism doesn't mean it can't be amazing. Look at not just this movie, but Star Wars, Harry potter, Toy Story, etc. I don't see what you're getting at besides a movie has to not stray from our reality to be amazing.

Wow, 160-something pages? There's a lotta WoW fans here on Tip.It. Though it would never happen, maybe WoW deserves it's own sub-forum...

I absolutly hate it when people complain about movies , ESPECIALLY movies like Superhero flicks and the like, lacking realism. This movie wasn't made to be real. It's a got man dressed like a bat beating up criminals, a guy with half his face burnt off but still alive (though this would be possible in real life, you get my point), and a psycho dressed like a clown mass-murdering people. And people are complianing about the cellphone stuff? Seriously? Just take it for what it is, a FICTIONAL movie. Sure, the movie had a real tone to it, but not striaght up realism. You wanna see a movie that has realism, go see a documentary or a biography. You shouldn't have even thought about realism walking into a Batman movie. :|

She got fat...

Look at the scores on Rotten Tomato. Man, I wanna see it again soooo bad....It was beautiful...

Absolutly amazing in every aspect a film could be. Beautiful score, fitted the scene every time. PERFECT acting, Heath Ledger abosultely STOLE the movie. Several unforeseen plot twists and just general unpredictability (which the Joker highlights as one of his quality keys to success) makes a very fresh and beautiful story. Coupled with such awesome characters, with basically no CGI... I honestly regard this movie as a classic, and at this point, the best movie of the '00-decade (and it doesn't look like any movie coming out will top it). [hide=]The dancehall scene, scene where Batman interrogates Joker, and where Joker talks about how he and Batman will be doing this "forever" are my favorite scenes. The Harvey Two-Face scene was amazing too, a shame he died though. Would've been the perfect villian for the next movie...[/hide]

Less then 24-hours til my showing, I'm hyped as HELLLLLLLL. \ :thumbsup: :shock: \ :thumbsup:

I know, I can't wait.

Oh i'm so sorry, don't get so mad, you might pop a zit, or that mcdonalds might back up and give you a heart attack. Nadril, I'm not talking about mozart, I'm talking about the average rapper ffs who the beep was talking about mozart here? Oh sorry for voicing my opinion here, it seems all the other fat little nerds on this website would rather have their opinion shoved down my neck. Sorry for not knowing so much about music as you do, I must be spending too much time out with my friends, playing sports, and dating. Shame on me. Is that all you can do when you look like an idiot in a conversation, call the guy you arguing nerdy or fat or something? 'Cause it's like all you do, and it's corny. Anybody who needs to go to a video game website to brag about there real life is obviously lacking a real life in general. If you're so busy dating girls and playing sports, then fine, leave, nobody's asking you to post here. And you not the only athletic person on this board. I'm a JV basketball player and Varsity distance track runner at my high school. So your generalizations and stereotypes are null.

Eh, I'm honestly good skills now. Sailing sounds...Terrible...Summoning is a great (albiet, terribly hard to level) skill, the only new skill I've liked (first skill released when I was playing was construction) so far. Sailing, or anything else just seems pointless.

...Please, explain. I see people saying stuff like "3rd age? Just junk trade it". Somebody explain junk trading, and items used in the process please. :D

Yeah 1up is a great site. I've been a member since like '04.

How is Guthix atheism? To say a god symbolizes the lack of a god is contradictory. So for future reference, Guthix = Balance. And: Saradomin Good Zamorak Evil Kinda simple, really...

Don't, don't. I played for a month and stopped. It was terrible, Runescape is better than it (which is sad, because RS is just a simple browser-based game). It's empty, like the most crowded servers is like Runescape servers (the servers are supposed to hold 10,000, and they're doing Runescape numbers :wall: ). Customer service is terrible and ban innocent players for "Macroing" (it's seriously like shooting in the dark with them), and everybody's a jedi, so it has a major lack of variety. But you can't blame people when the only cool jobs are bounty hunter and jedi. Nobody wants to be a dancer. The game has switched up everything several times now. It started out with combat like Runescape's, where you basically sit and watch, then it became real-time (a major stress on your mouse if you use a blaster). And on top of all of that, it's like $15 a month. Just pray BioWare's secret project they've been working on really is the rumored KOTOR MMO. That would be done right.

:lol: That post was hilarious.

You have got to be kidding me... Uhhh, no. You heard 2001? :| He's much more simplistic than people who drum for bands, but I still like him.

RS mugs and figures, please :)

No, I don't think George Lucas intended on bringing back the Empire, you know, destroying the Galaxy and then using the force to bring it back, or all of the enemies from the original trilogy coming back to life or something like that. I do consider video games canonical though because they're were made by LucasArts and they have a certain series to follow, whereas any hick author can add some ridiculous new thing like force invisibility, or go back and time and bring the Empire to the future. And alot of the EU is very confusing, like Tyosha Xi or some ridiculous name like that went to the planet Xxarkson to rescue the zuzi animals from the emperor's control over the Ghtizon league? I mean wtf? ...Dude, WTF? Now you're just trolling. And really, Lucas greenlights all the canon material. And everything you wrote down was rediculous, and never happened. And yeah, the games are canon, but what makes the books any less canon then them? Because you don't like to read? It's in the top corner, right below the Death Star logo.

Uh, 8 days and I'll be doing the same (with less friends though) \