Satenza

You don't understand the concept of exploitation cinema Of course I do, and having a girl with a gun for a leg isn't exploitation it's just stupid. Peckinpah was considered exploitation at one time, except he did it in a mature way and had reasons for it. Tarantino is just imature.

Ouch :x

Why are all of you insulting him? All he has is a differing opinion, and a debate is a collision of opinion be it true or not, that doesn't warrant anyone to get personal. I can see what XplsvBam is saying, technology has taken over our lives, we use it for pretty much everything.

Yes we have all established that scientifically it is rubbish and could never happen which leaves God to be the cause for everything within the story. The water, the changing of animal nature for a short period, the sheer impossibility of a wooden vessel being able to hold that many animals ect. It would have been better and less trouble if God just kileld off everyone and started again. Anyway, so center the discussion around the moral behind it, promoting genocide.

A chick with a gun for a leg, give me a break. :notalk:

I agree that people overhype it but they do it to an amount that no film ever created could live up to the expectations. I wish people didn't do that. :D

But Locke is based on the philosopher of the same name. Locke therefore wins every character contest in Lost. :D

Theres no one great point about the movie, it's just a combination of brilliant acting, editing, direction, cinematography ect. It's a great story and a great film. You should definatley make an effort to see it.

Oxford professor Richard Dawkins forums specifically for philosophical debate. He also answers questions on the odd occassion it seems. http://www.richarddawkins.net/forum/index.php See my topic http://www.richarddawkins.net/forum/vie ... hp?t=10008

Noahs Ark Against science, against rationality, against logic against everything we have to test whether something is true or not. For fairytales, for ignorance, for intolerance, for immoral acts that harm others(Genocide).

Your question was do you think Men and Women have equal right. What you think has nothing to do with Sharia law unless you are in favour of Sharia law. Then yes your laws promote inequality between men and women.

Obviously there are inequalities in sharia law.

They don't have free press, how can they publically oppose it? Do you happen to know it has never been opposed or are you just making statments that you don't actually know the truth behind. It's quite a big claim to say theres no resistance to Sharia Law. In the western world we are familliar with equal rights for women but when your religion and culture that surround every aspect of your life tell you that they are not it's hard to beleive otherwise.

How would you know there isn't any 'secret' resistance groups because afterall they are secret. You are again making bold claims about entire nations.

Growing up and living in a state where you have been indoctrinated since birth, surrounded by the culture promoting the laws it's hard to break away and think that it is wrong. If they protest or even say they disagree with a law they get killed, or beaten, or lashed. That makes them pigs? No, it makes them human beings.

I never said you should respect their beliefs i said you should respect their situation.

Ha...*I* should learn to respect humans, but it's cool for them to kill people over a belief? Tell me, O' worthy, great human being, who are they to decide who lives and who dies? They're all fools. Where did I ever say "It's cool for them to kill human beings" or is the only way you can possibly challenge me to put words into my mouth? Im asking you to respect their situation without making stupid remarks such as "Absolutely disgusting excuses for human beings. I would rather live and associate with pigs." when talking about Muslim countries, I just realised you never specified the Government either. One could easily take that to mean the entire country. Even if you did just mean the Government my point still stands.

I don't agree with the law but I'm not going to call the people disgusting pigs which you did. Those people have been brought up within a country where this is accepted as the normal way to deal with things. Indoctrinated all their life in the ways in which they punish and the laws they must follow. You need to aquire some respect for humans brought up in those places and not just insult them. That achives absolutley nothing and helps absolutley no one.

Dude, don't stereotype about muslims. I'm not muslim, but I have loads of muslim friends and they are some of the nicest people I have ever met. I agree with you saying the terrorists are pigs, but the whole population? What right do you have to say that? Just because one American could be bad, you don't see anybody saying " 0h y3@h @m3r!ca bl0w$". Your a fag. Well done, you had a good point and destroyed your credibility at the end. That could be considered even more stupid than what Tigra said. Thats saying something.

Thats not what he was saying in the slightest. All those evil actions are in the name of religion, we all know the argument "Some people do this and some people do that" but at the end of the line people are being murdered because of this. Faith is just a word used to make a irrational, illogical and all together stupid beliefs sound justified. How do you expect people who have faith to not kill people in the name of it is the question. The only way the majority of people beleive in any religion is either through indoctrination or culture.

May have looked like isn't what he looked like. Even that picture shows Jesus as a causasian when he was from the middle east. And whats this emphasis on what Jesus looked like? Not everyone should or does follow one religion.

No-one knows what Jesus looked like.

What? You're being stoned because you've done something they find extremely serious. To them, marriage is very important, if you've noticed. They punish people their way, you punish your people your way. I'm sure you'd be mad if they criticized the way you handled criminals. I think you need to read what you just wrote. You are being stoned for something they beleive is extremley serious. When in actual fact she was raped and beaten the hell out of. How dare I critisize their law because wait for it, it's their law? Thats plain crazy. How can you expect human progression if you don't question anything? Why do you even part-take in debates if you think we can't question things? I'm sick of this attitude that questioning peoples opinion is 'offensive' when really it's doing them a favour. If someone whips the hell out of another person then they deserve to have their actions questioned regardless of the law. What about Nazi Germany? Killing Jews, would you argue that we shouldn't have gone to war because it's their law? Of course not. I understand the view that if we live in a state we should accept it's laws. However I do not agree with the principle that those laws should go unquestioned. Socartes was put to death for his differing opinions and when given the choice to escape death or not he said no because he had accepted the laws of the state. That doesn't in any sense mean they should go unquestioned and that we should accept law because it's law. Especially barbaric laws like this.

Thats stupid.