Sir_Squab

Guessing it's Magic: The Gathering.

The wall nails the finish. 96hp.

The wall dodges it and gains an agility level. Wait, what? 94hp.

Banned because she's allergic to the slab.

Banned because no matter what Mr. Kitterson does to me, I will come back an order of magnitude stronger then I was.

The wall participates in a harpie orgy. 93hp.

29968

10/10 I'm in your siggy.

7/10

For those of you who hate the Runescape homepage. Well damn -- looks like our clan will need to find another even this weekend. Playing Pest Control with a bunch of monkeys has no appeal to me whatsoever ... :rolleyes: Was your clan planning to do it in the beta? Remember, you only need to make it through one game for the costume piece. Also, dunno what it was, but the games I played were really easy. Maybe it was all the max level armour, or maybe people who play the beta games actually intend to play the game, but twas far too easy.

Probably because you got 1 of every type.

...lolwut?

I liked #8. Lawl? Ahahaha... oh I am the worst rusher in the world. ... I. LOST. MY. LOOT.

Yeah, you should NOT bind a platebody until level 50dg. You'll want a weapon first.

I don't know what to think about it. I don't believe he actually thinks the SoF is fun. I guess he likes gambling? It seems extremely suspicious to see a mod encouraging something widely hated that makes Jagex a fair bit of money. And to bring it up in a tech support thread... I bet he gets some sort of bonus for promoting the SoF >_< Like ALG said, paid to troll. Also, ALG, when it's a J Mod supporting the SoF, I DO find it hard to believe believe that an employee is praising his company's product.

29971

The wall gets turned to darksteel. 91hp.

Why I don't do clues.

Ikr

Then we need to get through 11 more pages to get to page 700.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but in "mono" relationships where one of them cheat, then they get back together, doesn't this more often then not eventually lead to the cheater cheating again? At which point you have a cycle of cheating, being caught, being sad, getting back together, then cheating again. Aaaand suddenly you aren't having a real mono relationship. Also, I'd love to see on like a sitcom or something, guy1 is married to girl1, guy2 is married to girl2. Guy1 and girl2 see each other on the side, while guy2 and girl1 see each other on the side. Then they meet up on one of their dates. Lastly, I have an urge to nitpick a comment >_> Wouldn't that depend on how you act on those feelings?

Saved from page 2. Needs moar posts.

What is dat telos o_O

The wall is pwnage. 89hp

I guess... according to that definition, it makes sense. The thing is, rationality is often viewed as a synonym (or maybe it's just me) for, well, Spock-think. Vulcan thinking. Viewing something without emotions affecting your judgment. Google has "Based on or in accordance with reason or logic" as the definition of rational. I would argue that the act of revenge is, quite often irrational, according to the definition google gave me. At any rate. Emotional desires never completely remove other desires, but they can often take the forefront in one's thinking. Eh, it isn't that specific. I don't really want to be in a relationship right now anyways, since what I'd like is a long-term relationship yet I'm at a point in my life where a long-term relationship is a bad idea. I need to get my shit together and figure out where I'm going in life before I start chasing after girls, lol. Basically, I could never imagine myself outside of a monogamous relationship for reasons I can't explain, yet polyamoury seems like the most logical default way to go at relationships. I mean, 50% of all marriages, roughly, end up in divorce. Basically, most of the polyamoury arguments make sense to me, yet it's still not something I could ever see myself incorporating into the way I live my life for reasons I can't explain. Also, I'm pretty sure half the reason I'm posting here is to procrastinate >_<