Viktorkrum77

The whole idea of this thread followed a very long discussion about it with a woman from Wales. :wink:

any particular reason for not going to main countries? and why Finland? Well, it's just that they can be too touristy, and too many people study abroad there that they become common places. And I don't mean this to impune upon their culture, because everywhere on Earth, touristy or not, is worth a visit at least once. But sometimes when you go to places that are less common, there's just that feeling that you have learned about and experienced a part of the world most don't, as opposed to France, Britain, Italy, etc, where most people have been there. I like Finland because it's very modern, very clean and healthy, has a good government, ranks among the best countries in the world, has a good economy, and very friendly people. Among other reasons as well.

Don't go to main countries unless you really want to. Most people go there already. Try more unknown places. I want to study abroad in Finland.

I am wondering that too. Under the picture of your look alike there should be an Information symbol, and then next to it, it will say click here for cool options, click that. Then just follow the steps.

I want to repeat his question. Are they actually still inbred? How have they not succumb to genetic diseases?

^The top result is accurate, but the rest are off, weird. It's sort of like mine.

That was my initial reaction hehe. :P

No, you put your real life picture in the website, but don't post it here. Oh, well, that doesn't matter, it still give us an idea, and that's good enough to get a feeling for what a user looks like.

This thread has admin approval. And I would also like to thank Suzi for the idea. On this site: http://www.myheritage.com Click on "Face Recognition" and then follow the instructions. You will have to register, but fill in fake info, it doesn't matter. Then go to Google images and find a picture of the celebrity(s) you most look like, and post them here. I got Matti Vanhanen, Prime Minister of Finland. The picture they had used held a little more resemblance, but all in all, I think it's quite true. The full list, although I only agree with Matti Vanhanen and Edgar Rice Burroughs:

How come if someone who can't stand mushrooms wants to like mushrooms, they just don't live like they do and eat mushrooms every day? How come someone who is left handed and wants to become right handed, doesn't just live a right handed life. My example is better. :P Look, I'd bet anything homosexuality is just a maladaptation.

No, Viktor Krum is hot! Now if only he wasn't staring in a horror film ie. Hostel II. :( ^OT.

Hehe, cool! Haha, fear my ability to speak very bad and very broken Swedish! :twisted: :P

I suppose I could, but do you find the thought of having a sexual relationship with a male physically repulsive? If not, then how can your rant so loudly againly homosexuality. If yes, then you realize how I feel about haveing a sexual relationship with a woman. It is unnatural to me. I could just go sleep with hot chicks, but seeing as you are arguing the Christian perspective, that is immoral as well as sex before marriage is also a sin. Exactly, I looked a naked woman and all I felt was, ugh, why would you ever, how can you ever find this a turn on. But when I see a naked man I go, wow, that's hot, whatever, but what I mean is I'm turned on by men and turned off by women. But that doesn't mean I find women ugly. I could point out many women who are very pretty, like Asihwaya Rai. But that doesn't mean I'd want to have sex with them given the chance, I'd turn it down to be honest. I'd rather have sex with a man over a woman, it's just not natural for me to find women at all "sexy".

I stand corrected. :)

Ah well, we'll pay for it when it happens. Mother Nature cares about no one, and doesn't wait for anything, if she unleashes and attack, she has no guilt, only society has guilt. And they thought Katrina was bad. But oh well, they'll learn sooner or later. When they have no plan and the world is screwed over, who is really going to care? Surely not the Universe, the world is a spec, so it disappears or grows decrepit, it isn't going to matter to anything anyways. The Universe will move on.

I just thought of something random, kissing is not natural. Animals have sex, that's it, any different forms of sex including kissing are actually human inventions and not the natural way to do things. Animals don't kiss, and we are animals, just more advanced.

I will reply with what Nitramosma said. I was implying that you can change anything with a little work, homosexuality is no different, you can make a straight person gay if you want. But why do we need more straight couples? They make up far more than 98% of the world if not more, and this is causing our resources to die down due to overpopulation. Not to say having kids is bad, as it is vital to our survival, but I see no reason to turn gay people straight. Let them live their life, we don't need anymore straight people as it is already, we could actually do with more gays to be honest.

English please? 31st of May of 1991.

Actually all it takes is one homosexual to stop being gay to disprove that statement. With enough psychology someone can stop having a mental disorder, but then scientists have still proven it to be an uncontrollable fact that mental illness is something you have no choice over getting or not. Hell, with enough work you could turn a black man white, you can turn a guy into girl, you can give a kidney to someone who needs it. But if it's something they don't control, then why change themselves? Unless it's harming themselves or society (which homosexuality clearly is not) then why should they change? That's like asking a black man, well if we can turn you white, why don't you turn white? It's irresponsible to even propose such ludicrous ideas. Besides, we should praise homosexuals, we don't need anymore straight people as it is popping out more and more babies every second that the world will soon no longer be able to support us.

Nah, we've already done that.

I keep saying we need a "Children of Men", I think it would be a great form of punishment.

I bet God gets a good laugh out of fundamentalist crazy homophobic Christians. I bet he's up there right now laughing at the world's closemindedness while he takes a few antidepressants to get over it.

Wanting to kill people merely because you don't like them is murder. The 6th commandments clearly says, "Do not murder".

Ciao, that's what I'd like it to be.

How do you feel about the Queen of England and the Royal Family as a whole? Do you think she's a symbol of Britain and an important figure, or do you think she is a complete waste of time and money and that Britain has it's own sufficient enough (though lacking) government. BTW you can also discuss other Royal Families as well, Norway, Sweden, etc. So you can use this as general Royal Family thread.