Viktorkrum77

Well I assume it's a for record, not money.

Well, after seeing this, I think I have changed my mind that WTC7 was not a controlled demolition. This sites shows images I had never seen before, images are what I look at as the best proof.

It gives the US government a reason to invade Iraq. So it doesnt just look like we are going after the oil. By making us think that Terrorists did this, it makes us mad and pissed off, so we believe anything. *Note, I am not saying the Terrorists don't attack our country, just didn't do this specific attack. I can give some "coincidences" that may shock you, but only if its aloud. (And no, not the stupid "9/11=911!!!11" thing. Other shocking stuff) Ok, you conspiracy theorists go on and on and on about what is wrong. But have you ever explained, if so, how the USA pulled this off? It's way not as easy as you would imagine. I've never heard once an explanation as to a way they did it. And I can't rebuttal in lack of said explanation. So am I to assume Osama Bin Laden is being played by Eugene Levy?

Yea, Sweden is one of them. But those countries are so liberal those kinds of things easily pass.

Do you mean, Lazerbeam? :?:

Corporate America says: Your/Our money!! :!:

Are you daft? Because a person(male) is a homosexual does NOT make them more emotional. I'm wondering you've ever met a homosexual person in real life...because you just said some of the stupid [cabbage] I've ever read. I definetly don't need your respect; let alone want it. I've met homosexuals. I've even done landscaping for them. They seemed like normal guys. You seem to be making assumptions about the small portion of the gay community while I'm making it off the majority. I'm rather curious if you've ever been around a woman in your life to know what you're talking about, too. Agreed. Not all gay men walk around wearing pink and stilettos and going, "Oh no he didn't!". I've met some of the most many gay men before, like a gay wrestler. Yes, it is proven gay people have heightened amounts of, or are attracted to testosterone or estrogen, but those levels can vary depending. You Arc, are making what we call a STEREOTYPE!

My theory is, you kill someone, than you die. If it can be proven you're guilty, and you took someone else's life, than you deserve to die in a very crucial manner. I've been thinking iron maidens would be a good idea. Those or the things they use to chop off your head, they're more entertaining and more painful than normal suicide. You kill a man/woman/child, than you are DEAD. End of story, this kind of thing should be simple, you whack a man, he whacks you back. But in this day and age, I have absolutley no faith in the justice system.

I'm pro corporal punishment. It gets the point across. Look at your grandparents and then look at kids of our generation.

Because insurers are set to pay around $861 million to Silverstein for the lost building 7, debt on the property is around $383 million. Now why not do it? It does not take long to set up a controlled demolition if you have experience with buildings, know similar layouts, and do not have to gut it. Gutting the building is what takes several months. Comparing the trapezoid WTC7 to the countless other buildings CDI has imploded, it would be easy for them to locate and know what supporting columns to collapse. Setting up explosives is as easy as drilling a hole in the column and wiring it.

This article says Silverstein lied, see the page about WTC7. We know for fact it was a controlled demolition, there's no debating that, why are they insisting it's not? Both CDI and Silverstein admitted to it.

Yeah, it is illegal to blow up a building for insurance, but I don't know the full story. I assume he used a loop hole of some sort, he knew what he was doing enough to build a new complex. Months of planning is equal to gutting the building. He didn't gut the building, he left everything where it sat. And gave Controlled Demolition Inc. a few hours to review the support structure of the building. After that it was just a matter of setting up explosives on the exterior supporting columns. The demolition wasn't perfect, there's even a fault line very visible. They had no idea he did it until he admitted it. They stressed that it was due to fire, and made themselves look like an idiot when he admitted to it. I agree %150. :D

The document published pre-Silverstein's admitting of using controlled demolition to collapse tower 7, blaming the collapse on gas fire and debre from the towers. This was false yes, and several people tried to convince the FBI they were wrong, but they were hard headed (like the government is), and waved it off as a conspiracy. They never knew it was a controlled demolition until Silverstein admitted it on PBS a few years later. He imploded it for insurance reasons (not because the mayors bunker was there, or because the FBI had offices there), no one was in the building at the time, it was around 5 pm, and he stated he imploded it so he could get full insurance value for the entire complex, it was the only thing standing in his way and the full insurance money. The government has no reason to hide this truth, they were as mislead as the public, only Silverstein, his close employees, and Controlled Demolition Inc. knew the real truth.

Fail. He deliberately confessed to it in or around 2003. Not to mention, they hadn't ignored it, they had just throughout it far stretched. In 2003 however, they had to eat crow. He never admitted to it until 2003, I think it was 2003, or around that.

When you said the IMDb boards were tight-knit I literally "lol'ed". But just that board makes sense. I could see something like that. A lot of the other boards aren't very tight-knit, people are generally very rude with no provocation at all. I know, tell me about it. :P But we have so taken over the Phantom board, that even the mods don't dare bother us and our all-mighty offtopicnes!! :twisted:

IMDb (Internet Movie Database) You can find me on the Phantom of the Opera boards under the screen name 'TheMaskedMan52'. :wink: Our board has turned into one huge off topic "phamily". :P

Meh , somewhat. I've been on more 'tight-knitted' boards though. Mainly IMDb. :wink:

I would say even in Saudi Arabia, men and woman equality is pretty good. But to be honest, the only ones who had it right were the Egyptians. They had both female and male leaders and gods. Sometimes I don"t like when men lead things because they can be egotistical and not understanding. I would like to see a woman as president, I would love it! I love as well that the speaker of the house is female now! But not Hilary Clinton...

I believe they were in Hebrew. But if you are right, than you have found the most conclusive bit of evidence against them.

Yes, it is. The War in Iraq was probably one of the few things that made me not like Bush during the 2004 election. It was a bad idea to start, and a bad idea to continue. And an even worse idea to add more to it. I'm sort-of-kind-of-maybe-half looking forward to Bush getting kicked out of office. Not death. Because that would mean Cheney would be president. And that would be way worse. Note: The following is sarcasm. Please understand that. I am NOT being serious. Okay? Why doesn't Bush just launch one of his "nucular" weapons against Iraq... :wall: Flame me for any mistakes I made, or anything in my post you disagree with... The problem is, we can't just sit there and debate the past, it's happened, and now we have to accept it and move on. Something has to be done, and if we just pulled out completely, the goverment would be too unstable in Iraq, and Muslim Extremists would harbor plotting attacks against the US. So if we did pull out, we'd have to have great defense against such attacks, which are commonplace even today. To sum this up, we've/he has dug ourselves into too big a hole.

"A feak loim", rough translation, "A freak lion", it predicts the attacks that have happened and have yet to happen that are freak accidents caused by stupid mistakes and out of control lions. :P

I was agreeing with you Barihawk. I don't think anyone will pick a day. I personally believe we have caused that day by what we have done, and nature will make it happen sometime.

Who says there even is a God? Proof please? 2 pages in > 40min, yes, there is a God \ :P He used the word 'if', which is quite surprising.

The first step to accepting global warming is to accept that it is going to happen. But that doesn't mean we are going to die, and we don't even know when it will happen. All we can do now is try to limit it as much as we can, or hope the world does itself. Which it will, but who knows if society will die out or not in the progress.

If you follow this theory, than yeah, I agree that God will choose the day when he sees fit. And will give us a few warnings to test humanity as a whole. Of course, I don't believe this, but if you do, this is a reasonable assumption. You're right, what is happening to this world, I am actually agreeing with you! :shock: