Jump to content

Wisp

Members
  • Posts

    2720
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Wisp

  1. I think that was already taken but they never did anything with it. Buying out countries doesn't really work either haha.
  2. They're also allied with half the world. And building the facilities to manufacture exo-breakers or whatever would probably take a few years. In any case, you do still have numbers. Brazil will probably remain neutral on this. Unless we develop some super-anti exobreaker weapon, in which case we could always sell it to the highest bidder. But I doubt it.
  3. Well, in any case, Iran will probably declare war on you now.
  4. We're not in the middle ages. A huge wall might do something to stop immigrants or refugees, but if any army wants to get over a wall, it's not exactly impossible. Helicopters, explosives, or just sail around it. How does a single plane manage to drop off troops into ever military manufacturing plant in the country, then pick up all the soldiers again without someone noticing or stopping it. Unless all the plants were conveniently 5 feet away from eachother, and they each had a complimentary landing strip to pick up the soldiers.
  5. A year isn't really plausible. People in real life have been working on them for decades. I know things are sped up a bit for this game, but the Brazil-norway space project has been going on for 10 years, and we're not even done with our main spacecraft yet. Oh, on that topic, the space station has now been fully assembled and is in earth's orbit. Assembly of the prototype is going well, maybe a year more till we finish all of the final tests. Railgun prototypes have already been built in 2009. Isn't it 2020? Yeah, but the US navy didn't expect to have real working railguns for a long time, as in railguns effective for military. If you had worked together with Iran on the railgun production thing, you have railguns would make sense, but if you've just begun research, as you said in your post, it would take a long time. I said highly operational MODELS. They won't be naval weapons for several more years. The concept itself isn't at all complicated, either. I misunderstood your use of the word model. M16 stands for model 16 for example. My bad, should have said prototype #-o Either way, there will be a working railgun in North Africa in the next year. It's ok, misunderstandings are bound to happen in a thread like this. I just don't want someone to just pull a highly advanced weapon system out of nowhere in a year.
  6. A year isn't really plausible. People in real life have been working on them for decades. I know things are sped up a bit for this game, but the Brazil-norway space project has been going on for 10 years, and we're not even done with our main spacecraft yet. Oh, on that topic, the space station has now been fully assembled and is in earth's orbit. Assembly of the prototype is going well, maybe a year more till we finish all of the final tests. Railgun prototypes have already been built in 2009. Isn't it 2020? Yeah, but the US navy didn't expect to have real working railguns for a long time, as in railguns effective for military. If you had worked together with Iran on the railgun production thing, you have railguns would make sense, but if you've just begun research, as you said in your post, it would take a long time. I said highly operational MODELS. They won't be naval weapons for several more years. The concept itself isn't at all complicated, either. I misunderstood your use of the word model. M16 stands for model 16 for example.
  7. If you were stuck with nothing but some blowguns and darts and poison, by all means, use them, but otherwise they would only be useful if you were in an area where they couldn't get to you. Because they're unwieldy, difficult to aim, have limited range, a long reload time, and many other problems. If you're actively fighting zombies with only a blowgun, a easier way out would be to drink the poison yourself.
  8. A year isn't really plausible. People in real life have been working on them for decades. I know things are sped up a bit for this game, but the Brazil-norway space project has been going on for 10 years, and we're not even done with our main spacecraft yet. Oh, on that topic, the space station has now been fully assembled and is in earth's orbit. Assembly of the prototype is going well, maybe a year more till we finish all of the final tests. Railgun prototypes have already been built in 2009. Isn't it 2020? Yeah, but the US navy didn't expect to have real working railguns for a long time, as in railguns effective for military. If you had worked together with Iran on the railgun production thing, you have railguns would make sense, but if you've just begun research, as you said in your post, it would take a long time.
  9. I am slightly concerned as to who is giving away Exo suits, but seeing as its only one, it shouldn't matter too much. Although I am curious as to its intended use? We're just going to be seeing what it's capable of, in case we ever end up in a fight with a country that has them. The suit itself will probably be destroyed during the testing process. I'll give you the basics of what we're going to be doing. First we'll do mobility tests, the one we got doesn't have any weapons mounted on it. See how fast it can run, how much they can lift, etc. Then we're going to fire bullets of varying calibers (starting with a .22) into the suit, with a test-dummy type thing inside of it. We'll increase the caliber until there's any actual damage. Maybe a few more tests, but that's about it. They're suits. A person goes inside them, it increases their speed etc. A year isn't really plausible. People in real life have been working on them for decades. I know things are sped up a bit for this game, but the Brazil-norway space project has been going on for 10 years, and we're not even done with our main spacecraft yet. Oh, on that topic, the space station has now been fully assembled and is in earth's orbit. Assembly of the prototype is going well, maybe a year more till we finish all of the final tests.
  10. You can try. I'll join if it interests me.
  11. Wisp

    Live Concerts

    I saw them a few months ago. The moshpit wasn't that intense because most people were there just for [cabbage]s and giggles, rather than because they liked the band. Saw sick puppies last night. Got some signed stuff. I was sort of off to the side of the most pit because there were some crazy huge guys going insane in the middle of it and I weigh like 110 pounds so I don't think that would have gone over too well.
  12. Razor wire might hurt them, but it wouldn't kill them flat out. They could get through it. And we're dealing with different zombies. They can run, climb, are more coordinated, but easier to kill (technically, the faster moving speed would make it harder, but headshots are not required). Also it's easier to get infected if we're going by the 28 days/weeks/months later type.
  13. The problem with that is that these guys can climb. So if there's a ten foot wall, they could get up that. If there's a window five feet off the ground, they could probably get through it if they break the glass.
  14. Ok, let's, just for the hell of it, say that rage zombies might last for 1-2 years. And we don't know why they don't starve or whatever, let's just say. What do we do? They can climb as well as an ordinary person (but they have limits), they run, but they don't require a headshot.
  15. An Olympic sprinter would run faster than most zombies, probably faster than we could run, but not as fast as it was before since, in such high level sports, you have to use special techniques to run as fast as they do, and zombies wouldn't remember that. They'd still run damn fast though.
  16. Somalia before this game was the corruptest country in the world, and one of the poorest. Pirates aren't gonna do their government's dirty work, they're just gonna be pirates. And Somalia does not have any army that could stand up to any European county. Also, if I remember correctly, I have a few dozen ships off of Somalia's coast to stop pirating. Any more acts of war against other countries will lead us to declare war on you. I'm sure a few other countries would join me as well. There would not be much you could do, as we have aircraft carriers, ICBM's, and one weapon that is classified. Though I did mention I was building it in one of my first posts in this thread, so I'm not just pulling this out of nowhere here. Also, I got a recently built exo-suit off of one country who had them, though they told me not to say which country they were, so it doesn't break any alliances. And yes I know there are anti-tampering measures, so I can't suddenly start producing more.
  17. Headshots are still best if possible. They are harder to kill than humans in that humans feel pain. If you shoot someone in the chest with a handgun, they're probably going to be down. Alive, but down. You shoot a zombie in the chest, they'll keep going till they're dead. The human brain, if shocked by something like pain can do anything from going unconscious or just shutting down all the bodies systems and dying. Rage Zombies won't do that. The best guns for rage zombies would be an auto-shotgun, with a good capacity, like an armsel striker (12 shot, 12 guage, semi-auto shotgun.), an LMG due to it's stopping power and huge bullet capacity (would be difficult to get one. But you could get a pre-ban gun in most states in the US. Wouldn't be modern though, but better than nothing, or an assault rifle decent accuracy, range, and stopping power. It's not too hard to get a pre-ban ak-47 if you know what you're doing in the US.
  18. One: A bayonet would be a very good melee weapon. With the added range of the rifle it's attached to, it would have as much range as anything other than a spear. It's also easier to use than a spear because you can put more force behind it, and it's easier to aim. A kukri or machete is also good, despite what you might think. And sword, despite whats more "realistic" here, I hate to say it, we're talking about zombies. If a disease mutates enough that we get rage zombies, who knows if we could get something similar to Romero zombies. And come on, the rage-zombie survival guide would blow. "Chapter 1: Grab some food and a couple'a bottles of water and sit in your basement for a week. The End."
  19. Decreased rate actually. Since the virus kills pretty much everything that's not human if it infects them, it makes it harder for bacteria to build up and for it to rot. If we're going with romero-type zombies, it would take up to 5 years or more for the brain to rot. The bones would still be fully intact barring other injuries though, probably. Maybe a bit more brittle.
  20. Ever notice how archeologists have found human bones that are millions of years old? yeah. They're not gonna rot in a week and a half of being dead.
  21. Underweight, but I still have more muscle than pretty much all the girls in my class, so I guess it's just lack of fat. Can't complain about that.
  22. If by an airgun you mean a gas powered glorified airsoft gun, then that won't do [cabbage].
  23. Ok, lets say the reactor did meltdown (they don't exactly explode.) Ever heard of Chernobyl? Did that wipe out all of asia and europe? Let's stop being stupid here. The reactor probably killed a lot of people in the immediate area around it, maybe up to a hundred miles away, but that's it. Most people were apparently living in there magically insta-build bomb shelters, so casualties would have been minimal.
  24. Again, no countries were destroyed, except for most of holland if you want to go through with that. Maybe some casualties in other areas, but in general, if a nuclear reactor exploded in the netherlands, not much would happen overall to the rest of europe.
  25. No countries got destroyed, because that's *not how nuclear fallout works*. Blowing up a nuclear reactor would, to my knowledge, not have the same affect as a nuclear bomb going off. Holland would lose the most people, no matter how many magically transformed into moles and moved underground. A lot of europe would be untouched, fallout would travel with the wind, and places like switzerland where there are tons of mountains would be mostly fine. Also, blowing up a nuclear reactor counts as using it as a weapon, which is against the thread rules, so it never happened. Plus nuclear liquid? Really? Really? That might affect some of western europe, and the coastal countries for a bit, but there is no way it would get out of europe. If you dumped 10 million gallons of red dye into the ocean, it would turn the place where you dumped it red, and then it would just dissipate as it got pulled by currents. It would not affect pretty much anywhere else.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.