April 4, 200719 yr Author Ahaha, Graham Norton and Paul O'Grady arn't cool. Whats all this about sexual abuse = homosexual anyway? People are different to each other, it's called individualism and everyone should be able to respect that. Well they may not be 'cool' but they get millions tuning in to watch their shows :P I totally agree with you on the individualism and respect issue however it's a problem when your individualism causes you to lose respect. A friend to all is a friend to none.
April 4, 200719 yr Ahaha, Graham Norton and Paul O'Grady arn't cool. Whats all this about sexual abuse = homosexual anyway? People are different to each other, it's called individualism and everyone should be able to respect that. Well they may not be 'cool' but they get millions tuning in to watch their shows :P I totally agree with you on the individualism and respect issue however it's a problem when your individualism causes you to lose respect. So now homosexuals can't have a public profile because they're popularising homosexuality? So what? XplsvBam, do actually have an issue with homosexual people or just the idea of it? And is it because of your religious beliefs or just personal sentiments? "Da mihi castitatem et continentam, sed noli modo"
April 4, 200719 yr Ahaha, Graham Norton and Paul O'Grady arn't cool. Whats all this about sexual abuse = homosexual anyway? People are different to each other, it's called individualism and everyone should be able to respect that. Well they may not be 'cool' but they get millions tuning in to watch their shows :P I totally agree with you on the individualism and respect issue however it's a problem when your individualism causes you to lose respect. Yes, being homosexual is the only reason people watch their shows. Actually...for Norton that might be true. This is how much you all raised for charity. Thank you.
April 4, 200719 yr Author So now homosexuals can't have a public profile because they're popularising homosexuality? So what? Well if they are popularising homosexuality then more kids will be homosexuals which may lead to them being descriminated by Religion etc. Yes, being homosexual is the only reason people watch their shows. Actually...for Norton that might be true. I wasn't talking about the content on their shows some of which I find entertaining myself, but the style and manner they are presenting them and the homosexual presenters are being shown as role models, however doing this may also prevent discrimination as it will let people get used to accepting people for who they are...and maybe not.. A friend to all is a friend to none.
April 4, 200719 yr So now homosexuals can't have a public profile because they're popularising homosexuality? So what? Well if they are popularising homosexuality then more kids will be homosexuals which may lead to them being descriminated by Religion etc. That is bull, its like me saying 'With more carrots on TV, more children will become vegetables, so lets not put carrots on TV'
April 4, 200719 yr Author So now homosexuals can't have a public profile because they're popularising homosexuality? So what? Well if they are popularising homosexuality then more kids will be homosexuals which may lead to them being descriminated by Religion etc. That is bull, its like me saying 'With more carrots on TV, more children will become vegetables, so lets not put carrots on TV' Not really because a human cannot morph into a carrot. A friend to all is a friend to none.
April 4, 200719 yr Author A human cannot 'morph' into a homosexual. Yes he can. Person A is born (there is no homosexual gene) Person A sees Famous Person B who is homosexual and is getting all the attention. Person A is lonely to get attention he becomes homosexual. I know this may sound like IÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢m against homosexuality but I am not just making points. A friend to all is a friend to none.
April 4, 200719 yr Well in that case, 'Person A', is not homosexual, he just wants attention. Ok, how about this? Its just like saying 'You shouldn't put dead people on TV, because then children will see them and want to be dead too, and they will morph into dead people (by killing themselves, see?)'
April 4, 200719 yr Str0wez, give up now, honestly that's one of the worst arguments i've ever heard. "Da mihi castitatem et continentam, sed noli modo"
April 4, 200719 yr Author Well in that case, 'Person A', is not homosexual, he just wants attention. Ok, how about this? Its just like saying 'You shouldn't put dead people on TV, because then children will see them and want to be dead too, and they will morph into dead people (by killing themselves, see?)' You can brainwash a person into doing/believing almost anything tbh. Person A wants to be popular so he becomes a homosexual. A friend to all is a friend to none.
April 4, 200719 yr Well in that case, 'Person A', is not homosexual, he just wants attention. Ok, how about this? Its just like saying 'You shouldn't put dead people on TV, because then children will see them and want to be dead too, and they will morph into dead people (by killing themselves, see?)' You can brainwash a person into doing/believing almost anything tbh. Person A wants to be popular so he becomes a homosexual. *sigh* Please, just read assassin's post...
April 4, 200719 yr Author Str0wez, give up now, honestly that's one of the worst arguments i've ever heard. Do you have a better one? EDIT: at least say something against my arguement A friend to all is a friend to none.
April 4, 200719 yr Author Well in that case, 'Person A', is not homosexual, he just wants attention. Ok, how about this? Its just like saying 'You shouldn't put dead people on TV, because then children will see them and want to be dead too, and they will morph into dead people (by killing themselves, see?)' You can brainwash a person into doing/believing almost anything tbh. Person A wants to be popular so he becomes a homosexual. *sigh* Please, just read assassin's post... I take that as one cookie for me. A friend to all is a friend to none.
April 4, 200719 yr He doesn't need one, because you are wrong! Homosexuals are no different than you or me. Your bible is wrong! Get over it...
April 4, 200719 yr Str0wez, give up now, honestly that's one of the worst arguments i've ever heard. Do you have a better one? EDIT: at least say something against my arguement Where do I start? You're basically saying children should not be exposed to anything in any kind of media or experience that might somehow sway their minds to a different kind of lifestyle which some people in society might not like. So, that's pretty much anything really. Besides, if it's ultimately their choice, what's the problem? "Da mihi castitatem et continentam, sed noli modo"
April 4, 200719 yr Author He doesn't need one, because you are wrong! Homosexuals are no different than you or me. Your bible is wrong! Get over it... OMG IÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢m not even a CHRISTIAN!!11one!!1!! How am I wrong if homosexuals i know get persecuted everyday for being themselves... They are different from me because they have different sexual orientation than me, every human is different from other we're not clones. A friend to all is a friend to none.
April 4, 200719 yr He doesn't need one, because you are wrong! Homosexuals are no different than you or me. Your bible is wrong! Get over it... OMG IÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢m not even a CHRISTIAN!!11one!!1!! How am I wrong if homosexuals i know get persecuted everyday for being themselves... They are different from me because they have different sexual orientation than me, every human is different from other we're not clones. Then ffs, stop making ridiculously stupid comments like earlier about homosexuals.
April 4, 200719 yr So...they hide? Don't come out, stay hidden, ever afraid of how society might view them? Yeah, great way to live your life. "Da mihi castitatem et continentam, sed noli modo"
April 4, 200719 yr Author Str0wez, give up now, honestly that's one of the worst arguments i've ever heard. Do you have a better one? EDIT: at least say something against my arguement Where do I start? You're basically saying children should not be exposed to anything in any kind of media or experience that might somehow sway their minds to a different kind of lifestyle which some people in society might not like. So, that's pretty much anything really. Besides, if it's ultimately their choice, what's the problem? It's their choice but I don't want to see anyone getting hurt.. It's morally bad to expose a child to anything harmful period. A friend to all is a friend to none.
April 4, 200719 yr It's morally bad to expose a child to anything harmful period. So homosexuals are morally bad now eh?
April 4, 200719 yr Author It's morally bad to expose a child to anything harmful period. So homosexuals are morally bad now eh? I wasn't talking about homosexuality being bad assassin said harmful things in the media, and my point is homosexuality can be harmful. A friend to all is a friend to none.
April 4, 200719 yr It's morally bad to expose a child to anything harmful period. So homosexuals are morally bad now eh? I wasn't talking about homosexuality being bad assassin said harmful things in the media, and my point is homosexuality can be harmful.Howso? Because hardcore Christians persecute them for it?
April 4, 200719 yr Author It's morally bad to expose a child to anything harmful period. So homosexuals are morally bad now eh? I wasn't talking about homosexuality being bad assassin said harmful things in the media, and my point is homosexuality can be harmful.Howso? Because hardcore Christians persecute them for it? No not only Christians nearly all religions oppose it, and ever heard of homophobes, and if you read this thread there are people here saying they would happily beat one up just because of who they are and their sexual orientation.. A friend to all is a friend to none.
April 4, 200719 yr No not only Christians nearly all religions oppose it, and ever heard of homophobes, and if you read this thread there are people here saying they would happily beat one up just because of who they are and their sexual orientation.. So basically, you're wanting the short-term way out? Stop the amount of homosexuals, then you slow down the hate crime? That's your thinking, correct? Would it not be much, MUCH better, to give the homosexuals their human rights , and then try to persuade the different religions to part with thier old fashioned, wrong prejudices?
Create an account or sign in to comment