Anybody got any thoughts?

 

Amazing goal by sens with about 1 second left in 1st period, couldn't watch 3rd period b/c father said it was to late :roll:

 

 

 

GO SENS GO

I don't really care too much this year. The ducks are my home team, but my little bro's best friend brother is on the senators (mike comrie or something); ah well, even though I don't particularily like hockey, it's the only thig on around this time of year. (At least in my house)

I was hoping for the penguins to make it I guess I'll just root for the Ducks because I really don't like the Senators.

hey my i live in Ottawa, like come on! And go your bro's friend!

I don't watch hockey :|.

 

 

 

I bet a majority of the fans live in Canada, eh? :lol:

Even though i'm Canadian I still hate the Sens. Go DUCKS :D.. oh shoot the games on right now. Thanks for the reminder.

Im an UNPROUD canadaian ............................

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GO DUCKS GO!!

quack quack WE TIED IT/!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1-1

Penguinduck3

 

 

 

Quack. Quack. Quack. Moo. Quack. Quack.

What noise does a senator make?

 

 

 

Political Grunt. Tax Write-offs. Political Grunt.

Go Ducks! They take game 1. I will never cheer the Senators on, mostly because I'm a Leafs fan, and partially because my friend's ego has doubled in size since they made it to the finals.

Anybody got any thoughts?

 

 

 

GO SENS GO

 

 

 

TRUE THAT! even though they just lost...it was a close game

 

 

 

As long as they can split the first to games they're fine

Anybody got any thoughts?

 

 

 

GO SENS GO

 

 

 

TRUE THAT! even though they just lost...it was a close game

 

 

 

As long as they can split the first to games they're fine

 

 

 

the game starts at 8PM toinght, i cna't wait to watch it!!!!!!!!! :D :) 8-) :lol: :thumbsup: =D> :mrgreen: O:) :thumbup:

Go Ducks! Well, I guess. I really don't pay attention to the NHL much. The only reason why I want the ducks to win is because they HAD an AHL team here in Cincinnati. I went to one of the first games they played.

Dirty Ducks are showing their true colours. They interfere at every possible chance and the refs aren't calling it.

I don't really care too much this year. The ducks are my home team, but my little bro's best friend brother is on the senators (mike comrie or something); ah well, even though I don't particularily like hockey, it's the only thig on around this time of year. (At least in my house)

 

 

 

NBA Playoffs.

 

 

 

The Western Conference Finals will probably end tonight, but the Cavs Pistons series is going to be a good one, probably a 7-gamer.

 

 

 

GO CAVS! (please, just please, play ONE good third quarter.) :pray:

SelÃÆÃâÃâänne<3

SelÃÆÃâÃâänne<3

Gotta love the guy with the last name that sounds kinda like salami. But my favorite Duck is definitely Perry.

 

 

 

 

 

ANAHEIM -- Never have two one-goal games felt like such a colossal mismatch.

 

 

 

For the second straight game, the Anaheim Ducks reduced the highly touted Ottawa Senators to hockey rubble, scoring late in the third period to seal a 1-0 victory and heading to Ottawa with a 2-0 lead with Game 3 set for Saturday.

 

 

 

Somehow, in the wake of these two games, the space between these two teams seems much, much greater than the difference on the score sheet.

 

 

 

With all excuses about a long layoff and poor officiating stripped away in Game 2, the Senators were once again outmatched in every meaningful element of the game.

 

 

 

Outhit, outworked, outchanced and outshot. They keep this up and it'll soon just be "out."

 

 

 

It was fitting, given the attention focused on the need for the Senators' top line of Daniel Alfredsson, Dany Heatley and Jason Spezza to rebound after a miserable Game 1, that it was yet another turnover, this one by Heatley with less than six minutes left in the game, that led directly to Samuel Pahlsson's wicked wrist shot that turned out to be the winner.

 

 

 

It was a perfect ending to yet another virtually perfect performance by the Ducks and added a layer of pressure on the Senators' big line a mile deep and twice as heavy.

 

 

 

"Definitely we're counting on a couple of guys to be big-time players for us and they played better tonight, but they didn't create much in the way of offense," Ottawa coach Bryan Murray said. "I'm hoping when we get home, we can do a little juggling and it will come."

 

 

 

For the second straight game, it was the Alfredsson line that was on the ice for the winning goal. In Game 1, it was Travis Moen playing the part of unsung hero for Anaheim, while Wednesday it was Pahlsson who used Ottawa defenseman Joe Corvo as a screen after picking up the loose puck just inside his own blue line and ripped a shot past netminder Ray Emery, who had been a rock for the Senators all night, ultimately stopping 30 of 31 shots. The Senators' big line also managed just one shot in the third period.

 

 

 

"Overall, their 'D' and their checking line have been stars of the series to this point," Murray said.

 

 

 

During the first three rounds of the playoffs, when the Senators were rolling through Pittsburgh, New Jersey and Buffalo in five-game series, the big line was on fire, collecting 58 points. The Ducks have not only neutralized the prolific trio, but they've also feasted on them. On many shifts, the Pahlsson line, which also includes Moen and Rob Niedermayer, controlled the puck in the Ottawa zone for long stretches of time.

 

 

 

Jean-Sebastien Giguere

 

 

 

 

 

Jean-Sebastien Giguere made 16 saves to shut out the Senators in Wednesday's Game 2.

 

 

 

Apart from a quality Heatley chance shortly after the Pahlsson goal and a dangerous-looking Alfredsson shot that was blocked by Moen with time running out, the unit had no meaningful opportunities.

 

 

 

Even when the Senators' second-ranked playoff power-play unit was given a 5-on-3 advantage for 1:08 in the first period, they could not beat Anaheim netminder Jean-Sebastien Giguere. It marked the second game in a row the Sens' power-play unit could not take advantage of a lengthy two-man advantage.

 

 

 

So, what's gone wrong with the big guns?

 

 

 

"If you've got the answer, let me know and I'll put it into play next game," Spezza said. "We've got to win two games at home now. We've put ourselves in a tough spot."

 

 

 

Historically, it's not just a tough spot, it's virtually hopeless.

 

 

 

Of the 30 teams that have taken a 2-0 lead at home in the Stanley Cup finals, 29 have gone on to win the series. Only the 1971 Montreal Canadiens rebounded from an 0-2 start on the road in the finals to win the Cup. Overall, teams that go up 2-0 in the finals have won 39 of 42 series.

 

 

 

Murray recalled the 2003 Cup finals, when his Ducks (he was then GM) lost the opening two games of the finals against New Jersey and came back to win two at home to tie a series they would eventually lose in seven games.

 

 

 

"This is a team that's very capable of doing it," Murray said.

 

 

 

Of course, they're capable of coming back with two wins at home. Their play this spring suggests it is possible and their lineup reinforces that notion. But the Senators have shown little indication they're the same team they were a few weeks ago. And as much as they believe the answer is in their own dressing room, the answer may be more fully revealed in their opponents' room.

 

 

 

After an often uneven Western Conference finals victory over Detroit, the Ducks seem to have found that often-discussed but rarely seen "next level."

 

 

 

By midway through the first period, they had outshot the Senators 10-1 while continuing to batter them physically (although, to be fair, the Senators likewise showed more physical spunk, at least early on). Through two periods, the shot margin was 26-11 in favor of the Ducks. Through the first two games, the Ducks have dominated the supposedly more offensively gifted Senators, outshooting them 63-36.

 

 

 

The Ducks even curtailed their usual parade to the penalty box without giving up any of their physical ferociousness. After taking seven minors to the Senators' four in Game 1, both teams each took four minors in Game 2 (only one after the first period and none in the third).

 

 

 

"It's unbelievable. You know, I told you before, it's not about Chris Pronger, it's not about Scott Niedermayer, it's all about us," offered veteran Teemu Selanne, who is now halfway to his first Stanley Cup at the age of 36. "This team is exactly as good as our worst player feels, and that's the toughest part, to raise everybody's level. And I think we've done a great job so far."

 

 

 

Giguere, who was rarely tested but did make a lovely move across the crease to deny Heatley, said he hopes his team doesn't get too caught up in the early-series success. At the same time, though, he said he hopes his teammates enjoy the experience as it may not come along again.

Sadly, I have to agree with the above post. It's like they don't even care. Jason Spezza pisses me off the most. He completely sucked that game. This is why I hate getting into sports...my team always loses :cry: ..Calgary, Edmonton, Ottawa (I'm not giving up hope yet! NY came back from 2 games down even though they still lost...it's still possible).

Sadly, I have to agree with the above post. It's like they don't even care. Jason Spezza pisses me off the most. He completely sucked that game. This is why I hate getting into sports...my team always loses :cry: ..Calgary, Edmonton, Ottawa (I'm not giving up hope yet! NY came back from 2 games down even though they still lost...it's still possible).

 

 

 

To play Devil's advocate, the Ducks play a pick-style of game that, if called by the book, would put them in a permanent 3-5 situation because there would be unlimited interference calls against them. Quick example? Corey Perry on Mike Fisher at the end of the first frame - no call, so Fisher flipped out and started punching Perry in the face and got called for roughing.

 

 

 

Or, Bauchemin's elbow into Comrie's nose should have been a 4min PP for Ottawa, no call.

 

 

 

Every time Anaheim enters Ottawa's zone their wingers pick Ottawa's defensemen slowing them up, which should be called for interference.

 

 

 

But even if you take all that into account, Ottawa still sucked.

I can't decide who I want to win:

 

 

 

Ottawa

 

 

 

Spezza went to my school.

 

They're a Canadian team.

 

 

 

Anaheim

 

 

 

Giguere is one of my favourite goalies.

 

I, um, strongly dislike Alfredson.

The only think I enjoy more than watching the Leafs win is watching the Sens lose. And as the leafs haven't been winning much lately, and the Sens HAVE, these past two games have been godsends.

 

 

 

 

 

DOWN WITH THE SENS!

 

UP WITH CLUTCHING AND GRABBING!

 

 

 

To play Devil's advocate, the Ducks play a pick-style of game that, if called by the book, would put them in a permanent 3-5 situation because there would be unlimited interference calls against them. Quick example? Corey Perry on Mike Fisher at the end of the first frame - no call, so Fisher flipped out and started punching Perry in the face and got called for roughing.

 

Admittedly, the refs haven't done the greatest job calling Anaheim's obstruction, but the refs will ALWAYS catch the retaliation. Fisher should've known better. Good for Perry.

just 2 more for Teme

how come nobody(expect one person and me), and i meannobody likes the sens :?: :!: :?: :!: :?: :!: :?: :!: :?: :!: