Seen it already on another board.

 

 

 

The best reason I can come up with is that the astronomers found Azathoth.

 

 

 

I only know Azeroth, wads Azathoth?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anyway how do they know?

 

How did they measure it?

 

 

 

are there night elves in there?

Space is a vacuum, but it still contains celestrial bodies, where as the void is a vacuum and contains...nothing.

 

I'm sure interstellar and intergalactic space contains nothing either, as in no matter. But the void....nothing separating it from the same definition as just "space". Is it like a blackhole, that sucks in and eliminates matter as well as energy?

Seen it already on another board.

 

 

 

The best reason I can come up with is that the astronomers found Azathoth.

 

 

 

I only know Azeroth, wads Azathoth?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anyway how do they know?

 

How did they measure it?

 

 

 

are there night elves in there?

 

 

 

You savages clearly never read H.P. Lovecraft.

i have a hard time enough believing that the universe was created by this "big bang theory"

 

 

 

 

 

to me that enough sounds like a lame theory. but this huge empt space 1billion light years long thats voided of matter? full of rubbish.

i have a hard time enough believing that the universe was created by this "big bang theory"

 

 

 

 

 

to me that enough sounds like a lame theory. but this huge empt space 1billion light years long thats voided of matter? full of rubbish.

 

 

 

Your argument and evidence is thoroughly compelling. I suggest writing to a scientific journal.

i have a hard time enough believing that the universe was created by this "big bang theory"

 

 

 

 

 

to me that enough sounds like a lame theory. but this huge empt space 1billion light years long thats voided of matter? full of rubbish.

 

 

 

Your argument and evidence is thoroughly compelling. I suggest writing to a scientific journal.

 

 

 

 

 

i was just stating my opinion which i have the right to do so, and i didnt list any of it as fact smart @$$. nor did i ever say my thoughts were correct.

i was just stating my opinion which i have the right to do so, and i didnt list any of it as fact smart @$$. nor did i ever say my thoughts were correct.

 

You have a right to state your opinion, yes, but opinions backed up by reasoning generally have longer life spans :-s .

 

 

 

Just sayin'.

i was just stating my opinion which i have the right to do so, and i didnt list any of it as fact smart @$$. nor did i ever say my thoughts were correct.

 

You have a right to state your opinion, yes, but opinions backed up by reasoning generally have longer life spans :-s .

 

 

 

Just sayin'.

 

 

 

 

 

okay well then explain to me how such a theory such as "the big bang theory" have any reasoning to it? to me it sounds pretty easy to conclude, that a "big bang" happened out of "nothing" and suddenly, poof! the universe is formed as well as all the matter to come along with it and such.

and if thats the case, i guess it wouldnt be too far-fetched of an idea that there could be multiple universes outside of our own that just havent expanded far enough to collide with ours. and then what would happen if such a case did happen?

i have a hard time enough believing that the universe was created by this "big bang theory"

 

 

 

 

 

to me that enough sounds like a lame theory. but this huge empt space 1billion light years long thats voided of matter? full of rubbish.

 

 

 

Your argument and evidence is thoroughly compelling. I suggest writing to a scientific journal.

 

 

 

 

 

i was just stating my opinion which i have the right to do so, and i didnt list any of it as fact smart @$$. nor did i ever say my thoughts were correct.

 

 

 

What do you base your opinion on? Are you privy to knowlege of cosmology that the cosmologists aren't? Really, what forms the basis of your opinion?

 

 

 

If you like harbouring an opinion ignorant of what it is you have opinion about, why do you have that opinion? I don't have an opinion on anything to do with economics, for example, because I'm largely ignorant of it.

 

 

 

Is it not ok for you to accept that you don't know? Or do you prefer to just have a baseless opinion? Why? I honestly don't get that kind of mentality.

 

 

 

Don't take this the wrong way, you can have whatever opinion you wish; I'm not here to dictate what you should believe. As I've said numerous times before, in any kind of discussion, understanding comes from justification. I will understand you and why you have your opinion when the justification comes, not when you state what your opinion is.

 

 

 

Could you imagine a debate when everyone just states thier opinion?

 

 

 

Me: I believe X

 

You: I believe you are wrong.

 

 

 

How enlightening. I feel so much more fulfilled as a human being right now. I want to learn something. I value what you have to teach me.

okay well then explain to me how such a theory such as "the big bang theory" have any reasoning to it? to me it sounds pretty easy to conclude, that a "big bang" happened out of "nothing" and suddenly, poof! the universe is formed as well as all the matter to come along with it and such.

 

 

 

Have you any idea what the theory really is? Or have you just worked it out from the name that it's "like a big explosion" and there's some kind of faulty reasoning with that?

 

 

 

Do you have any idea how many years of scientific research have gone into refining the current big bang model? Or how the cosmic microwave background radiation, as well as the observed redshift from distant galaxies (proportional to distance) is good evidence for an expanding universe? Or how people like Stephen Hawking and Roger Penrose have shown that the universe almost conclusively started from a singularity? Or even how there have been various inflationary models to explain why we observe the universe the way it is? Or how Stephen Hawking has developed his no-boundary theorem to describe time at the big bang?

 

 

 

And you're calling the reasoning and evidence faulty? Good god man speaking from ignorance never does anyone any favours.

How can we go from a lame topic on a overly enthusiastic scientist's drunken claim after a late night party to a flame war?

 

 

 

I didn't mean the part about the drunken party, but it is speculation. Plus, the topic is still lame :P.