ashbear160 Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 as the title says avantese arent undead yet in the bestiary theyre are put under the undead are theyre supposed to be extinct but it an little wrong correct if possible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fredz Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 yeah. Salve amulet(e) has no effect. (Not tested 100%) 21 lag piles, 4 Pjs, 2 Party hat kills, 67 newbs teached. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkblade986 Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 Yeah, I realize that. I was the one who put all those monsters in, and at the time, Undead seemed like the best choice since they were technically thousands of years old. We have no "extinct" category, so if someone can suggest a better idea for what they should be categorized under, we can update it. don't worry, you are going to "hell" anyway. wanna race to see who gets there first?Officially reached 100 Combat at 1:33PM EST, June 14, 2007First Dragon Drop: Dragon Chain (Dust Devils) @ 10:48PM EST, July 14, 2008, lv113 combat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fredz Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 Yeah, I realize that. I was the one who put all those monsters in, and at the time, Undead seemed like the best choice since they were technically thousands of years old. We have no "extinct" category, so if someone can suggest a better idea for what they should be categorized under, we can update it. Hmm.. Maybe add a extinct category? or just put them in a General category?. Since they are flying maybe a "bird like" category? I don't think it matter that much as long as it is not undead. As most people bring out their salve amulet(e) (and maybe crumble undead?) when they see that a monster is undead, and since they have no effect on the avaiantese it really blows :( 21 lag piles, 4 Pjs, 2 Party hat kills, 67 newbs teached. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soma2035 Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 The Avionies and the Armadyl Spiritual Warriors and Mages and Rangers should probably just be categorized as "Avionies" as that seems to be their race. Same goes for Kree'arra and his/her bodyguards. Also, Growler, Bree, and Starlight from the Saradomin Encampment should probably be classified as "Animals" rather than undead... Want to learn to Nex? The Nex Hunters are recruiting! Click for more information! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmyk Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 Consider they were not 1,000's of years old. What group would they be in then? There's your answer :P Proud Retired Council of The GladiatiorzClick here for our website - 110+ F2P Combat Requirements Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginger_Warrior Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 I just put all of them as "Undead" when the update came out, since the story behind them made logical sense to label them as such. Over time, I realised people would hold us up for doing so. It was more to save time and get the profiles uploaded and released ASAP. Thanks for pointing this out though. I don't suggest we make a new catagory just for this, but I would recommend placing them under the "Animal" catagory to avoid confusion. I'll get round to doing this, along with putting up all the info about drops the Tip.It community has submitted as soon as I get time to do so. Remember there were 62 new monsters in this update. To put that into scale, there's usually only ever about 3 to a dozen new/edited monsters, so this is about ten times the size of what we're used to. It will take time before the information is perfect. | Favourite Game Music | Last.fm | HYT Friend Chat Rules | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyehawk78 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 How about a new monster category "Ancient"? Website Updates & Corrections | Website Discussion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mchainmail Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 maybe "Undead*"? The barrows brothers are the same way, since they are classed as Undead, but they aren't undead in terms of the salve ammy. I think the best idea is "Ancient" or "Mostly Dead"(jk on that last one) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeda45 Posted September 20, 2007 Share Posted September 20, 2007 The Aviansie were cryogenically frozen. I'd suggest a new "avian" category. Or i the "animal" category. If you jump into a river in Paris, you're insane. If you jump into a river in Egypt, you're in denial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginger_Warrior Posted September 20, 2007 Share Posted September 20, 2007 The Aviansie were cryogenically frozen. I'd suggest a new "avian" category. Or i the "animal" category. Yeah. But the problem with an "Avianated" catagory is that dragons are also flying, so you'd have monsters fitting in two catagories which is kinda incongruent. My personal opinion is that they were never actually 'dead', so they can't be 'undead'. However, they possess bird-like features, so I'd be tempted to place them under "Animals". I'm kinda reluctant to make a whole new race of monsters for what is essentially only a dozen or so monsters. When the Tzhaar came out, for example, there was a distinct difference between them and other monsters in RuneScape, and there was a big enough number of them for a new catagory in their name to be justified. However, Aviansie can already fit in a couple of catagories, so I couldn't really justify making a new catagory. | Favourite Game Music | Last.fm | HYT Friend Chat Rules | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts