Denismage Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 EDIT: I've increased the frequency 3 Ghz, plus BUS and FSB speeds. New pic: Everything is in the picture. Now, is it all right? I mean, I've started learning about overclocking recently and I'm still not sure what it has to be like. 778Mb RAM, 1 stick 512 MB PC3200, another is 256 MB PC2100. ^Should I remove the slower one, I'm afraid it is slowing down my system but at the same time I play games that require lots of RAM. What should I do? Computer is stable and never going over 60C. Any advices? Sorry for my newbiness. :oops: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defender2516 Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 Everything is in the picture. Now, is it all right? I mean, I've started learning about overclocking recently and I'm still not sure what it has to be like. 778Mb RAM, 1 stick 512 MB PC3200, another is 256 MB PC2100. ^Should I remove the slower one, I'm afraid it is slowing down my system but at the same time I play games that require lots of RAM. What should I do? Computer is stable and never going over 60C. Any advices? Sorry for my newbiness. :oops: I have a question, and i'm sorry that I cannot answer your question. But where do you go on your computer to get that screen showing your stats like that? I was trying to find it to over-clock my cpu, but I cannot find it. ~Defender~ If you love me, send me a PM. 8 - Love me2 - Hate me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denismage Posted September 21, 2007 Author Share Posted September 21, 2007 I have a question, and i'm sorry that I cannot answer your question. But where do you go on your computer to get that screen showing your stats like that? I was trying to find it to over-clock my cpu, but I cannot find it. ~Defender~ http://www.cpuid.com/download/cpu-z-141.zip Program I used. Overclocking is done in BIOS, but be careful when you are overclocking, so you don't burn your system. Here's the guide that has helped me. http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/di ... guide.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
das1330 Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 I would leave the stick in. While your memory will run slower, the extra RAM will give you more benefits then faster, but less RAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomster Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 Check the memory tab, it should show whet the current timings and ratio are. Depending on the chipset, it may not be able to take advantage of faster memory, and the PC2100 (DDR266) may be holding up ok at an overclocked DDR300. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blade995 Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 The slower memory is defently holding your other stick back. I would suggest getting more ram that is equal speed with your faster stick. If you can't do this, then leave it in because more ram is better than speed, providing that you can use a divider to cget the memory to a stable clock. The overclock looks good, I'm sure you could go higher. You may need a better cooler but since your chip is only a Celeron, it's not worth it. Check to see if it's 100% with the program called "Prime95". To check your temperatures use the program "Speedfan". Use it while prime95 is running to stimulate maximum heat and load. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denismage Posted September 21, 2007 Author Share Posted September 21, 2007 Thanks for the replies, I've decided to overclock 3.2 GHz, and I believe I won't go any further because of the peak 58C temperature while playing Oblivion/Calculating PI. I'll look into overclocking RAM later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blade995 Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 A few words of advice: When you overclock the ram, you can go probably high and raise the voltage to 2.8v and be perfectly fine. Maybe even higher up to 3.0v Since your using a prescott chip the 58c is not a bad temperature at all. Although, that is playing a game and not at a "true" full load like a prime test will do. Test out your temperatures with Speedfan because motherboard monitor is not being updated anymore so your motherboard may not be fully supported and giving incorrect readings. Which you should hope so because your power supply voltages are bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ltb2006 Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Which heatsink are you using? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denismage Posted September 22, 2007 Author Share Posted September 22, 2007 Which heatsink are you using? Aluminum one. :oops: It has thermal gel applied though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ltb2006 Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Which heatsink are you using? Aluminum one. :oops: It has thermal gel applied though. Ok,just watch the temps using speedfan or similar. It might be worth getting a new heatsink to push it that bit further. Another helpful thing is to go on an overclockers forum,read the stickies and/or find someone that'll give you some more advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blade995 Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Which heatsink are you using? Aluminum one. :oops: It has thermal gel applied though. Well aluminum is fine for your overclock. If you want a cheap and effective way to reduce temps, get some new thermal paste. Arctic silver 5 is the best out there and it's like $6. Some people may argue that arctic C̮̩̉̉ramique is the best, but I don't see a difference. They are made by the same company and are about the same price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobgoblin11 Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 I never got the hang of overclocking - I always knew it was to push your PC's performance over and above what it says on the box, but I thought it was mainly done by people who wanted to just find out what they could push their machine to do, to find out just how far they could take it. Do people actually do it to use permanently then, not just as a one off to find out? If so, I might have a shot... 99/99 Fletching, 99/99 Cooking, 96/99 Strength Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nadril Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 I never got the hang of overclocking - I always knew it was to push your PC's performance over and above what it says on the box, but I thought it was mainly done by people who wanted to just find out what they could push their machine to do, to find out just how far they could take it. Do people actually do it to use permanently then, not just as a one off to find out? If so, I might have a shot... Generally its just to push out more performance. Some things really overclock better than others (some of the intel 2 duo core processors are a beast to OC) while others you won't really get much of a gain. To be honest unless you are having problems or are running slow in a game I wouldn't bother risking Overclocking unless you're a nut who likes to get every last ounce of power out of your rig. Personally I'm waiting until I possibly need to over clock, mostly because I'm running on stock cooling. I'm going to see how stuff like Crysis runs and then decide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvl3scroll Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 yeah, replace the slower RAM, your CPU specs seem fine. make sure it is cooled well, I would not leave an overclocked computer on for extended periods of time; shut it down when you go to bed or when you go out. Overheating is bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blade995 Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 yeah, replace the slower RAM, your CPU specs seem fine. make sure it is cooled well, I would not leave an overclocked computer on for extended periods of time; shut it down when you go to bed or when you go out. Overheating is bad An overclocked computer can be on 24/7 and be fine. If the computer can take the heat it will be fine. I don't consider it a stable overclock if you can not run it 24/7 without problems. Although you should shut your computer at night for over reasons, such as saving electricity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blipo Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 I'm overclocking my Intel Core 2 Duo. So far I've gone from 2GHz to 2.55GHz. Running both cores at 100% for the last ten minutes, and I'm totally stable at 46 C. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blade995 Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 I'm overclocking my Intel Core 2 Duo. So far I've gone from 2GHz to 2.55GHz. Running both cores at 100% for the last ten minutes, and I'm totally stable at 46 C. Stable for 10m minutes is nothing. If it crashes even before 12hours it is not stable. Are you sure thats 46c for the processor at full load? Download a program called Intel TAT which will tell you what your really temps are, you will be surprised. The only way to have a 46c full load temp is to be on chilled water. BTW I also have a Core 2 duo (@ 3.1ghz) with a very good heatsink and it's at 65c under full load with TAT (using TATs full load feature). Which is a good temp because thats the maximum it could ever reach because that program simulates the maximum heat, which a real world program will not come close to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now