October 30, 200718 yr Only the U.S.A. deserves nukes. america, 'nuff said. Err... Why? America, of all the developed nations, probably deserves nukes the least, because it's the most powerful country. That way, we couldn't take over the world... :-s Yes, I agree it's arrogant and stupid to say that only the US should have nukes (i.e., I agree with trapical for the most part), but to take the other extreme seems even less reasonable. Please, explain your reasoning for me before I end up forcing myself into some kind of anti-anti-America-and-Bush rant.U.S.A. deserves them because we are white and are the most powerful country in the world. Bush and Hitler are cool. Amen, brother. Amen.Amen. U.S.A. deserves them because we are white and are the most powerful country in the world. Bush and Hitler are cool. I hope that's sarcasm :-k .It wasn't.
October 31, 200718 yr [hide](ok there are some strange people here) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- darkmage099 wrote: Catnip1337 wrote: Rebdragon wrote: llamster wrote: Catnip1337 wrote: Only the U.S.A. deserves nukes. br34d wrote: america, 'nuff said. Err... Why? America, of all the developed nations, probably deserves nukes the least, because it's the most powerful country. That way, we couldn't take over the world... Yes, I agree it's arrogant and stupid to say that only the US should have nukes (i.e., I agree with trapical for the most part), but to take the other extreme seems even less reasonable. Please, explain your reasoning for me before I end up forcing myself into some kind of anti-anti-America-and-Bush rant. U.S.A. deserves them because we are white and are the most powerful country in the world. Bush and Hitler are cool. Amen, brother. Amen. Amen. reaper88888 wrote: Quote: U.S.A. deserves them because we are white and are the most powerful country in the world. Bush and Hitler are cool. I hope that's sarcasm . It wasn't. [/hide] well to be honest i have similar views about some of you guys out there at first 1. i'm partial for "total peace and non weapons even to the most holy guy on earth" thing, ok i aint the most smart dude out there but lets be honest. There aint such a thing there always be people with 1.insane idea's (exmpl hitler) 2.people with fanatics (relious or not) 3.power crazed people (like some country's leaders) 2.nuke's are not good does'nt matter who holds them because is threating for other countrys and maybe the gasp of some much power to be feared and essential rule the world make a sane guy totaly beserk with power and maybe he'll abuse his power and other bad things 3.someone actually hase to have much power comparred to some other because lets face it if the IRA, Al quada,my mom would have the power that nobody else hase then the world be less safe so those who oppose the "free country's" need to be feared so they wont invade,attack us well those are my views ow and to the guys/girls/very disturbed people (i go with the 3th who think hitler is cool are really insane (not a jew nor know any but the thought that people who could be my friend/lover never existed is a sad sad tought. ps don't hate my grammar i aint english,american or something that speaks it well but hey at least it try thanks for reading .evert siging out please if you have the time add twinsen345 for a chat i always love to talk
October 31, 200718 yr Idc who has a nuke. While you idiots are blowing away your countries, we in the C'bean will be sipping our juices and watching it on TV. Sigs by: Soa | Gold_Tiger10 | Harrinator1 | Guthix121 | robo | Elmo | Thru | Yaff2 Avatars by: Lit0ua | Unoalexi | Gold Tiger . Hello friend, Senajitkaushik was epic, Good luck bro.
November 1, 200718 yr As a pacifist, I say that no one should have a nuke. but then we'll be sitting ducks for the aliens!! lol! I guess Hitler would have used plenty Nukes. Funny thought... As long as only one country has them, they are a "I win" button for any war. I would think Hitler would of used a nuke on moscow, all of russia would of surrendered, making the east front safe from attack, but the rest of the allies would of still pushed through to germany on the west front. Hitler couldn't of used a nuke on america because it was too far off for a plane and Hitler wanted to deal with europe first. U-Boot (submarine). They were busy all the time intercepting american supplies on their way to britain. Of course nobody should have them. Why would anybody even want one? Only people with sever ego problems need something like that. Same with tanks. I don't want to say "any weapon" because especially meele weapons are a great way to train physical and mental strength.
November 1, 200718 yr Oh yes, like war was all that much better before nukes. As has been said, nukes in the right hands prevent war. It's moronic nowadays to try and defeat another powerful country militarily, 'cause if you do, they'll just fire some last ditch weapons and make all that country's efforts worthless. Nukes, however dangerous they may appear, do prevent war. Heck, even if someone did fire one, it wouldn't be war, it'd be instantaneous suicide. :-w [if you have ever attempted Alchemy by clapping your hands or by drawing an array, copy and paste this into your signature.] Fullmetal Alchemist, you will be missed. A great ending to a great series.
November 1, 200718 yr Oh ya guys, like war was all that much better before nukes. It was different. Cold war without nukes could have been less cold. Actually i don't care about nukes at all. I'm in no position to do anything about them and if someone pops one on my dome i won't notice it anyway. If someobdy drops one not close enough to kill me, but close enough to pollute my, i'll think about what i'll do next. Until then i don't care who has one.
November 1, 200718 yr Oh ya guys, like war was all that much better before nukes. It was different. Cold war without nukes could have been less cold. What :lol: ? If that was supposed to be a joke, uh... :lol: :-s . [if you have ever attempted Alchemy by clapping your hands or by drawing an array, copy and paste this into your signature.] Fullmetal Alchemist, you will be missed. A great ending to a great series.
November 1, 200718 yr Oh ya guys, like war was all that much better before nukes. It was different. Cold war without nukes could have been less cold. What :lol: ? If that was supposed to be a joke, uh... :lol: :-s . Huh? War always meant dead bodies, cripples and destroyed houses. As for the cold war, nukes could have prevented it from escalating. Then again there was nothing to gain in a war for both parties anyway.
November 1, 200718 yr Yes there was. With so many trees in the city you could see the spring coming each day until a night of warm wind would bring it suddenly in one morning. Sometimes the heavy cold rains would beat it back so that it would seem that it would never come and that you were losing a season out of your life. But you knew that there would always be the spring as you knew the river would flow again after it was frozen. When the cold rains kept on and killed the spring, it was as though a young person had died for no reason. In those days though the spring always came finally but it was frightening that it had nearly failed.
November 1, 200718 yr Author A nuke keeps another nuke in check, much like a gun killer would most likely keep him from shooting someone else who has a gun. Now usually if a killer has a gun, he may still shoot at the other guy with the other gun in hopes of killing him before he gets shot, but with nukes, there is no "hope" of surviving inless your making plans in a bomb shelter. Lets face it, nukes have never been used except in Japan 70 years ago and thats only because Japan had no nukes of its own. Now that major countries have nukes, you just can't go strollin in there anymore and attempting to take over the place. Its come to the point that military might is not the best option for destroying a nation. All you have to do is destroy its economy, and its military will fall with it. Then you take over. If you love me, send me a PM. 8 - Love me2 - Hate me
November 1, 200718 yr Oh ya guys, like war was all that much better before nukes. It was different. Cold war without nukes could have been less cold. What :lol: ? If that was supposed to be a joke, uh... :lol: :-s . Huh? War always meant dead bodies, cripples and destroyed houses. As for the cold war, nukes could have prevented it from escalating. Then again there was nothing to gain in a war for both parties anyway. How is killing millions of people and turning half a country into a nuclear wasteland not escalating? Retired 2146 overall - 136 combat - 6 skillcapes Plus I think the whole teenage girl thing will end soon (hopefully), because my girlfriend is absolutely in love with him(she is 18), and im beginning to feel threatened by his [Justin Bieber] dashing looks.
Create an account or sign in to comment