D4rk_Bl4de75 Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 might i add that just cuz u had 20-30 left, doesnt mean that you had all of those 30 fairly, for all we know 20 of those could have been zombies, and that would have given zf the win. -Dark Blade75 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sky192 Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 DOESNT MATTER, you said one person ruins it for DI. One person ruined it for ZF. The cheating cancels out, and it goes to the clan with 30+ people sitting at gds at the end. ZF lost, get it through your thick skulls. zf had uninvited guests-cheated di had uninvited guests-cheated (both cancled) zf left the battle field-cheated di left the battle field-cheated (both cancled) proof that di had zombies-cheated no proof zf had zombies-didnt cheat (zf wins that) do the math, zf wins if you wana say "well both cheated, why should one win?" im perfectly fine with saying it was a draw. -Dark Blade75 yea sio 1 di came back after dieing before the war started!!! and another came back with no armour but on the other hand c t stunner or what ever left the war and came back so did t kenny he left the battle field twice. always they came back with rune :wink:. so does that mean di wins? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D4nt3 Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 There was no rules you couldn't leave boundaries. The rule was if you left boundaries, you can't return so I didn't return. Besides I left the boundaries out of disgust and I stopped to scream DI cheated because I saw an officer (badass23) returning to do name calling once again. So it should be ok to return to exact revenge on someone that killed you previously and just stand there to die? It wsn't members but officers of DI that cheated. They should know the rules better. Even dante admitted to returning full rune or not it is returning and returning with other players too. Why return? It just causes more confusion. And being an officer he should have stayed at edge with his other players instead of bringing them back up and even providing morale boost. That in itself is some help. So i wasn't even allowed to become one of the hundreds of spectators? LMAO, get a life. I went up to see how both clans were doing just as EVERY spectator was doing. I caused no harm thus breaking no rules, and by the way our rules clearly stated no running from the war. You stay to death. Devil Dante - 124 Combat - Banned. Mr D4nt3 - 106 Combat - Banned. Septix - 116 Combat ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impaler99 Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 They get slaughtered in a war so they try to win by default. You dont even deserve to be on the top 5 anymore. Even if you think you win, we will still take your rune and slaughter you in the wild everytime we meet you, so your whining about us cheating does nothing but make you look like whiney little babies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W00tbeer2 Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 just cuz there are proof of only about 5 returning doesnt mean only 5 returned, half way through the war it seemed zf was owning but magically di poped up and won, dont think so. -Dark Blade75 Di dont have to cheat you beat zf, you have proven we had 4 or so members cheat We have proven 4 or so of your members cheated At the end we had over 30 members left You can't say that we had half our members come back you moron with no proof YOU ARE NOT THE RANK 1 CLAN YOU LOST THE WAR GET THE HELL OVER IT YOU SAD nOOBS 124/126 Combat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pkmachine9030 Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 just cuz there are proof of only about 5 returning doesnt mean only 5 returned, half way through the war it seemed zf was owning but magically di poped up and won, dont think so. -Dark Blade75 you don't know hwo di fights. They don't spread out and try to kill everyone. they usually go for 2,3,4 or however many people and don't fight 1 vs 1. that just kind of prooves di is a little more organized than zf was and listened to orders, that's why you saw more zf than di. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D4rk_Bl4de75 Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 DOESNT MATTER, you said one person ruins it for DI. One person ruined it for ZF. The cheating cancels out, and it goes to the clan with 30+ people sitting at gds at the end. ZF lost, get it through your thick skulls. zf had uninvited guests-cheated di had uninvited guests-cheated (both cancled) zf left the battle field-cheated di left the battle field-cheated (both cancled) proof that di had zombies-cheated no proof zf had zombies-didnt cheat (zf wins that) do the math, zf wins if you wana say "well both cheated, why should one win?" im perfectly fine with saying it was a draw. -Dark Blade75 yea sio 1 di came back after dieing before the war started!!! and another came back with no armour but on the other hand c t stunner or what ever left the war and came back so did t kenny he left the battle field twice. so does that mean di wins? it wasnt just one, more are being posted and already 5 are proven not just urban. Also plz show me where sc cheated. and if what you say is true then that means the cheating on the count of zombies is cancled out, no more things to be accounted for making it a draw, NOT a win for Di. I think that we can all say Di did NOT win, there is only a choice of making the war a DRAW or a WIN for zf. -Dark Blade75 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W00tbeer2 Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 I don't think we should win number 1 because you guys had some cheaters. But I also don't think that you guys should win with cheating. Thank you Even if you dont think we won whatever But saying your the new rank 1s is really pathetic 124/126 Combat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sky192 Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 might i add that just cuz u had 20-30 left, doesnt mean that you had all of those 30 fairly, for all we know 20 of those could have been zombies, and that would have given zf the win. -Dark Blade75 atually i dont that with all the spectators etc i think they would notice 20 zombies. and we would punish members that did this. but in dante who caused no change in the war with no armour and urban who came back before the war started their obvously not gonna be punished. for all i know we didn't have any zombies fighting in the war if your exclude urban who died before the war started. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pkmachine9030 Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 DOESNT MATTER, you said one person ruins it for DI. One person ruined it for ZF. The cheating cancels out, and it goes to the clan with 30+ people sitting at gds at the end. ZF lost, get it through your thick skulls. zf had uninvited guests-cheated di had uninvited guests-cheated (both cancled) zf left the battle field-cheated di left the battle field-cheated (both cancled) proof that di had zombies-cheated no proof zf had zombies-didnt cheat (zf wins that) do the math, zf wins if you wana say "well both cheated, why should one win?" im perfectly fine with saying it was a draw. -Dark Blade75 yea sio 1 di came back after dieing before the war started!!! and another came back with no armour but on the other hand c t stunner or what ever left the war and came back so did t kenny he left the battle field twice. so does that mean di wins? it wasnt just one, more are being posted and already 5 are proven not just urban. Also plz show me where sc cheated. and if what you say is true then that means the cheating on the count of zombies is cancled out, no more things to be accounted for making it a draw, NOT a win for Di. I think that we can all say Di did NOT win, there is only a choice of making the war a DRAW or a WIN for zf. -Dark Blade75 the way i see it is 1st option: draw 2nd option: zf lost 3rd option: di won 4th option: wait 2 and 3 are the same, oh well choose your pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slashiroth Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 I know ZF must be depressed right now, they were all hyped up for war, sure they would win, they had like 180 members signed up, and pulled out like 140 lmao. They cant accept theyve lost, so theyll keep going on and on hoping they might get lucky and pull out a draw, but no, sorry, thats not going to happen today :roll: Their just digging the hole deeper with every dumb post they make saying that they should win, for every post they make is like them gonna die at more pk trips and stuff, its dumb, zf, seriously, quit while your ahead :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crunk Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 just cuz there are proof of only about 5 returning doesnt mean only 5 returned, half way through the war it seemed zf was owning but magically di poped up and won, dont think so. -Dark Blade75 It looked like you had more because DI was TOLD to stay in the 5x5 box unless you ran to gds and back. So when you guys came there was a big box of Di piled on top of eachother, so it looked like you had alot more people. Look I didnt flame, whos proud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dork Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 There was no rules you couldn't leave boundaries. The rule was if you left boundaries, you can't return so I didn't return. Besides I left the boundaries out of disgust and I stopped to scream DI cheated because I saw an officer (badass23) returning to do name calling once again. So it should be ok to return to exact revenge on someone that killed you previously and just stand there to die? It wsn't members but officers of DI that cheated. They should know the rules better. Even dante admitted to returning full rune or not it is returning and returning with other players too. Why return? It just causes more confusion. And being an officer he should have stayed at edge with his other players instead of bringing them back up and even providing morale boost. That in itself is some help. So i wasn't even allowed to become one of the hundreds of spectators? LMAO, get a life. I went up to see how both clans were doing just as EVERY spectator was doing. I caused no harm thus breaking no rules, and by the way our rules clearly stated no running from the war. You stay to death. Is it so hard to make a noob to watch the rest of the war? At least that way you're not accused of cheating, and you're not getting in the way by being clicked on, only to be found that you have already died and are back 'watching'. But I KNOW that you returned from gds to edgie in full rune, explain plz. Sig And Avatar by Tripsis - 99 Slayer Blog - My Pyramid Plunder GuideOwner of Fire Cape since 28-09-2005 - 426th to 99 Strength Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Run_Forrest_Run Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 REMATCH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D4nt3 Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 DOESNT MATTER, you said one person ruins it for DI. One person ruined it for ZF. The cheating cancels out, and it goes to the clan with 30+ people sitting at gds at the end. ZF lost, get it through your thick skulls. zf had uninvited guests-cheated di had uninvited guests-cheated (both cancled) zf left the battle field-cheated di left the battle field-cheated (both cancled) proof that di had zombies-cheated no proof zf had zombies-didnt cheat (zf wins that) do the math, zf wins if you wana say "well both cheated, why should one win?" im perfectly fine with saying it was a draw. -Dark Blade75 yea sio 1 di came back after dieing before the war started!!! and another came back with no armour but on the other hand c t stunner or what ever left the war and came back so did t kenny he left the battle field twice. so does that mean di wins? it wasnt just one, more are being posted and already 5 are proven not just urban. Also plz show me where sc cheated. and if what you say is true then that means the cheating on the count of zombies is cancled out, no more things to be accounted for making it a draw, NOT a win for Di. I think that we can all say Di did NOT win, there is only a choice of making the war a DRAW or a WIN for zf. -Dark Blade75 No DI fleed from the battlefield, they only chased the fleeing ZF who were scared to lose their set, so in other words, the DI zombies cancelled out the ZF fleeing situation, leaving us with the control of GD's. DI winners, DI either Draw or win, ZF cant be No.1 knowing that they lost to a clan who had 30 ppl remaining as the 3 people who cheated wouldn't change the outcome of the 30 people. Devil Dante - 124 Combat - Banned. Mr D4nt3 - 106 Combat - Banned. Septix - 116 Combat ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slashiroth Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 just cuz there are proof of only about 5 returning doesnt mean only 5 returned, half way through the war it seemed zf was owning but magically di poped up and won, dont think so. -Dark Blade75 It looked like you had more because DI was TOLD to stay in the 5x5 box unless you ran to gds and back. So when you guys came there was a big box of Di piled on top of eachother, so it looked like you had alot more people. Look I didnt flame, whos proud Thats true, and that a TON of DI chased ZF to GDs, and past GDs, cause alot of them ran from battle west for some odd reason, then, when the guy they were chasing came back, like 20 DI were on him, and it looked like DI had returned or something, funny though, cause they were all skulled, so I doubt that :roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impaler99 Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 REMATCH If we rematch we will win again and ZF will try to look for something to 'default' win for them, they know they lost but wont accept it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D4nt3 Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 There was no rules you couldn't leave boundaries. The rule was if you left boundaries, you can't return so I didn't return. Besides I left the boundaries out of disgust and I stopped to scream DI cheated because I saw an officer (badass23) returning to do name calling once again. So it should be ok to return to exact revenge on someone that killed you previously and just stand there to die? It wsn't members but officers of DI that cheated. They should know the rules better. Even dante admitted to returning full rune or not it is returning and returning with other players too. Why return? It just causes more confusion. And being an officer he should have stayed at edge with his other players instead of bringing them back up and even providing morale boost. That in itself is some help. So i wasn't even allowed to become one of the hundreds of spectators? LMAO, get a life. I went up to see how both clans were doing just as EVERY spectator was doing. I caused no harm thus breaking no rules, and by the way our rules clearly stated no running from the war. You stay to death. Is it so hard to make a noob to watch the rest of the war? At least that way you're not accused of cheating, and you're not getting in the way by being clicked on, only to be found that you have already died and are back 'watching'. But I KNOW that you returned from gds to edgie in full rune, explain plz. Idiot, did you not think that i thought of that, did you not see the 100+ options of lvl 40's killing EVERY scout/spy? I logged on my lvl 4 Mr D4nt3 and died in under a minute, got 2 hit by a lvl 19 Ranger. So what was the point in going back up on the lvl 4 to just get 2 hit again, or be in full safety by going ona 121 knowing that you wern't causing any harm, what would you pick moron? Devil Dante - 124 Combat - Banned. Mr D4nt3 - 106 Combat - Banned. Septix - 116 Combat ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pkmachine9030 Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 i think zf is humiliated enough. ima go to bed now in hope that they stop trying to claim they won because anyone with a brain knows that the lost HORRIBLY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dork Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 There was no rules you couldn't leave boundaries. The rule was if you left boundaries, you can't return so I didn't return. Besides I left the boundaries out of disgust and I stopped to scream DI cheated because I saw an officer (badass23) returning to do name calling once again. So it should be ok to return to exact revenge on someone that killed you previously and just stand there to die? It wsn't members but officers of DI that cheated. They should know the rules better. Even dante admitted to returning full rune or not it is returning and returning with other players too. Why return? It just causes more confusion. And being an officer he should have stayed at edge with his other players instead of bringing them back up and even providing morale boost. That in itself is some help. So i wasn't even allowed to become one of the hundreds of spectators? LMAO, get a life. I went up to see how both clans were doing just as EVERY spectator was doing. I caused no harm thus breaking no rules, and by the way our rules clearly stated no running from the war. You stay to death. Is it so hard to make a noob to watch the rest of the war? At least that way you're not accused of cheating, and you're not getting in the way by being clicked on, only to be found that you have already died and are back 'watching'. But I KNOW that you returned from gds to edgie in full rune, explain plz. Idiot, did you not think that i thought of that, did you not see the 100+ options of lvl 40's killing EVERY scout/spy? I logged on my lvl 4 Mr D4nt3 and died in under a minute, got 2 hit by a lvl 19 Ranger. So what was the point in going back up on the lvl 4 to just get 2 hit again, or be in full safety by going ona 121 knowing that you wern't causing any harm, what would you pick moron? Umm, if my noob died (it didn't coz i r teh p00nage) I would've waited for a vid to watch the rest. Sig And Avatar by Tripsis - 99 Slayer Blog - My Pyramid Plunder GuideOwner of Fire Cape since 28-09-2005 - 426th to 99 Strength Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crunk Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 Can we lock this yet? 1- DI 2- ZF 3- Gladz 4- TD End. Good war though ZF, had some fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destinynight Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 he ran all the way east and then he came bak to the war he admited he died at the war yet i saw him run? there for he cheeted :lol: Reposted fo sake of above post. a ZF member cheating by leaving boundarys. ZF loses by default now? look at ur map, i see some di also broke that rule, like i did with the clan crashing rule that was broken lets cancle it out, zf still wins on default thnx to ur zombies. -noob Blade75 R u in that screeny? no am i? yes lol they were chasing some lvl 100 named king phil. and see those dots running around the gds thats zf 75% of zf was doing that stupid [cabbage] Desti is Back (H) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D4rk_Bl4de75 Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 just cuz there are proof of only about 5 returning doesnt mean only 5 returned, half way through the war it seemed zf was owning but magically di poped up and won, dont think so. -Dark Blade75 you don't know hwo di fights. They don't spread out and try to kill everyone. they usually go for 2,3,4 or however many people and don't fight 1 vs 1. that just kind of prooves di is a little more organized than zf was and listened to orders, that's why you saw more zf than di. oh your right, you are so organized that the first half of the war you remained unseen and went for 2 or 3 people, but at the end you put away your organized tactics and spread apart for an all out war? dont think so, if you stuck with a plan then it would have seemed zf won the full time, but all of a sudden tons of di poped Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwtKittN Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 This is my own opinion and not zf's. Di won the battle, but also cheated. We only have 3 or so pictures proofs of di cheating, but we can't catch everything. There may have been more. There were also a number of di that came back unarmed. Sure most were unarmed, but they could have helped call names (which some did). I heard a member of di say that if zfe comes on noobs as food mules, di would get an automatic win. And also the rpkers attacked both sides. They weren't called on by zf. I was chasing jeremy carr through gd ruins when I ran into a bunch of rpkers. I lagged and came back in lumby. Personally I think this should be a draw and have a rematch some other day. If not every clan should start encouraging cheating, because it won't be punished as long as your clan is the last one standing. I agree with dragun, both sides clearly had their faults, call it a draw and just leave it at that. Endless bickering back and forth really isn't getting anyone anywhere :\ Call it a draw and leave di where they are. We can rewar later sometime ;\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D4nt3 Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 REMATCH Yeh but after all this bull they're making up the only way we would do it now is if we got our wa beens as this war was all of ZF's rules, f2p and on a Friday (wdf?) If they want the No.1 spot now they can bloody come get us on a Saturday, P2p. Devil Dante - 124 Combat - Banned. Mr D4nt3 - 106 Combat - Banned. Septix - 116 Combat ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts