Banned because this one's come to the insane realization of a whole new line of 'Stick Puns', and they might start using them on the rest of you. :twisted:

 

~D. V. "Shall this one 'stick pun' your mind out?" Devnull

Banned for the asinine signature-esque quotes.

You're banned for not letting final thoughts, summaries, emotions, jokes, and/or offside thoughts become part of a hand-signing to your posts. :P

 

~D. V. "UP YOURS!" Devnull

 

 

 

(p.s.: This one is joking a bit with their hand-signature for this post. You wouldn't really find such being wished about a fellow forum gamer.)

Banned for doing it too frequently.

 

I'll elaborate on why its an annoyance - there's far, far too many times that the 'quote(s)' you use is quite vague, so it doesn't contribute much to the discussion or activity, if at all. If you're summarizing, it takes more than a few words to be concise - so why use a short 'quote' in order to express your ideas? I personally find it obtrusive/pervasive, like one of those advertising banners that doesn't go away.

 

It might be better to put a brief description of your character/personality in your real signature, as opposed to making a quote in every post - it would not only be more aesthetically pleasing, but more meaningful too.

 

Quotes are typically used to express a particularly unique idea by another author - to quote yourself would seem egoistic. In addition to that, a quote like ":P" would seem slightly pointless, since it could be expressed better in words within the post itself.

 

That's the explanation of why some users have pecked at you in various threads for it (which you may be unaware of, as it has been removed - it was done in a way that was considered ridicule/a personal attack though).

Banned because I feel the need to applaud you.

Banned for flattery.

Banned for doing it too frequently.

 

I'll elaborate on why its an annoyance - there's far, far too many times that the 'quote(s)' you use is quite vague, so it doesn't contribute much to the discussion or activity, if at all. If you're summarizing, it takes more than a few words to be concise - so why use a short 'quote' in order to express your ideas? I personally find it obtrusive/pervasive, like one of those advertising banners that doesn't go away.

 

It might be better to put a brief description of your character/personality in your real signature, as opposed to making a quote in every post - it would not only be more aesthetically pleasing, but more meaningful too.

 

Quotes are typically used to express a particularly unique idea by another author - to quote yourself would seem egoistic. In addition to that, a quote like ":P" would seem slightly pointless, since it could be expressed better in words within the post itself.

 

That's the explanation of why some users have pecked at you in various threads for it (which you may be unaware of, as it has been removed - it was done in a way that was considered ridicule/a personal attack though).

 

Banned for explaining in too much details why you don't like D_V_Devnull's signatures, and I completely disagree, I love them.

Banned for failing to explain why that triumphs my explanation.

Banned for thinking I need to explain it.

 

No, I don't. It's enough to just say that I disagree.

 

We aren't supposed to make smart or intelligent posts anyway.

Banned for suggesting that an unjustified opinion would triumph a reasoned position.

Banned because I was to lazy to read the first statement, therefore making the entire conversation I just read pointless.

Banned for making it pointless.

Banned for failing to note the shift in blame.

 

If he was too lazy to read it, then its his fault that the discussion is pointless to him, not mine.

Banned because I never suggested that it was your fault.

 

Not intentionally at least.

Banned for misunderstanding my post. I was claiming that bonez was blaming me for something I'm not liable for, and you didn't notice it although it was pretty clear.

Banned because the president of the United States of Yadiyoda doesn't like you.

Banned for fabricating irrelevant facts.

Banned because this is the ban thread, not a formal debate. We're here to do stupid shit like fabricate irrelevant facts.

Banned for not playing along.

Banned because this sentence is false.

Banned for contradiction.

How the hell was that a contradiction?

 

Banned for that.

Banned because it was a paradox, and therefore, inherently contradictory.

 

It also doesn't seem to have killed anybody, so we're probably not robots... Or we're particularly well made. One or the other.

Banned for not realising the paradox.

 

If it was true, then it must also be false. If it was false, then it must also be true. Both of which would be admitting a falsehood since it can't happen at the same time, therefore it cannot be either positions, thus admitting a contradiction.

 

EDIT - Banned for the ninja.

Banned for confusing me.