Corp

[Runecrafts]

EDIT - If I were to stay at corp from 95-99 def, do you guys think I would be able to LS a divine or ely?

[K4ylan]

LS'ing is generally better than CS'ing in most situations.

[onedaysoon]

For the small amount of 200m I would suggest CS'ing. Depending on your team sizes, I'll assume you're thinking 4-8 man, thats only a few sigils and if in a four man team a divine will get you that straight away. If you were to LS then you run the risk of missing a handful of sigils, not getting one for ages, losing a large chunk of your lsp and then getting an Arc/Spec. Of course if you LS on your first trip you could always snipe an Ely/Div, but really the chances of that are low.

 

Really what it comes down to is how much time you are wishing to invest there, you have said you enjoy it so maybe you would be happy to spend the extra few weeks there? In that case I'd say go with LS as you have a chance at making a lot more than the 200m in one go. If you don't wish to spend a lot of time there, or wish to have breaks (not panicking about LSP being wasted) then I would recommend CS.

 

Hope that helps

[Unhesitating]

I had 0 lsp, corped for 2 days, while missing nothing. Then sniped an Arc. All a matter of luck really.

[Runecrafts]

For the small amount of 200m I would suggest CS'ing. Depending on your team sizes, I'll assume you're thinking 4-8 man, thats only a few sigils and if in a four man team a divine will get you that straight away. If you were to LS then you run the risk of missing a handful of sigils, not getting one for ages, losing a large chunk of your lsp and then getting an Arc/Spec. Of course if you LS on your first trip you could always snipe an Ely/Div, but really the chances of that are low.

 

Really what it comes down to is how much time you are wishing to invest there, you have said you enjoy it so maybe you would be happy to spend the extra few weeks there? In that case I'd say go with LS as you have a chance at making a lot more than the 200m in one go. If you don't wish to spend a lot of time there, or wish to have breaks (not panicking about LSP being wasted) then I would recommend CS.

 

Hope that helps

I usually do 5-8 man.

 

Lol, my luck is horrible when bossing - so I was a bit worried about doing LS because I figured I'd probably miss some sigils, get some LSP, then end up getting a spectral.

 

I really don't mind spending a bit longer at corp, it's usually the only thing I do when I go on (unless I can't find a team, or I dg with my cc friends) - and getting a Ely or Divine from LS would be awesome.

[chrisman638]

LS'ing is generally better than CS'ing in most situations.

 

LSing with randoms is stupid because you will get kids who go in with really high lsp and get the sigils from you. If you CS in a 5 man team and get a divine you will have your 200m in one trip.

[GoldTatze]

Sigals in LS.

[CharlieBrown]

Why do you care what the most efficient way to make money is if you clearly do not care about efficient money making?

[gremmy]

LS.

[Rudyaard]

LS'ing is generally better than CS'ing in most situations.

 

LSing with randoms is stupid because you will get kids who go in with really high lsp and get the sigils from you. If you CS in a 5 man team and get a divine you will have your 200m in one trip.

 

No, the GE price of the sigil is "only" 850m, so you'd get 170M :)

Just felt like being picky :mellow:

[Quyneax]

CS is more consistent. LS allows you to get closer to the actual value of the item, you decide if that's bad or not.

[Runecrafts]

I think I'll just stick to LS then :)

[Runecrafts]

Updated question

[Th e Doctor]

I think yes. But i wouldn't recommend it.

[Runecrafts]

I think yes. But i wouldn't recommend it.

Corp & DG is all I do anymore, so I figured why not get 99 def, have fun doing so, and possibly make some nice profit.

 

I know it's not good money or anything (obviously that changes if you get a sigil), but it's what I like to do. :P