Just hit 97 and was wondering on the costs to getting 99.

Wat pots r u making??

Nothing at the moment, but I have the extremes to do 1400 ovl's, but I believe thats overkill. Truth be told I'm looking to lose as little money as possible. I wouldn't mind any of the potions that I do make to be convenient for use in slayer or at least resellable with not much loss.

Tbh it would be way cheaper and faster if u waited till bonus weekend at around september then do it.

I don't have the torstols and Im doing 99 con then.

https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AldEhLOK6ejJdGxma1R3NlNOS1F2UEpMNUY4MU11Rmc#gid=0

the cheapest way is to save your MTK high level herbs, and wait for bonus weekend to make extremes, and overloads.

 

Others will say to sell all your herbs and buy the cheapest ones according to grimy's spreadsheet.

 

I would say, who cares, if you are already 97 and have overloads, what is the difference between 97 and 99 other then childish bragging or a useless cape....

Look at my stats... I'm not going for a cape or bragging rights. I am going for max total. I'm your typical skiller though... I hold the old school standards of leveling efficiently while not plunging massive amounts of go into it all.

 

I have log admired grimys spreedsheets, but it's always been hard forme to gleam the information I need off them.

most of the time super attack and super defense are pretty cheap, I just save all my MTK herbs to make super and then extreme att, str, and def pots, and then come bonus weekend, I am fully stocked, except for the secondaries.

Most herbs are buying for med price or lower right now, so it would make more sense to put MTK on the most profitable items. Then use the money you made from that to buy more herbs than you would have gotten from MTK alone.

Most herbs are buying for med price or lower right now, so it would make more sense to put MTK on the most profitable items. Then use the money you made from that to buy more herbs than you would have gotten from MTK alone.

 

But if he did that he would be efficient, and that's not fun.

Doing MTK seems interesting. I've done it several times before.

Most herbs are buying for med price or lower right now, so it would make more sense to put MTK on the most profitable items. Then use the money you made from that to buy more herbs than you would have gotten from MTK alone.

 

But if he did that he would be efficient, and that's not fun.

I find efficiency fun. Let others share in my joy.

 

Doing MTK seems interesting. I've done it several times before.

This can help.

https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AldEhLOK6ejJdHlwRC1VRVJiUkFNM2JVQ3otNS0xUGc#gid=1

Assists to 99. Boom cheap.

Lol hah... Assisting to 99 as a supplement was what I was hoping to do. That would save me 900k a day if I planned on doing overloads most of the way.

Those spreadsheets update regularly right? I'm kinda digging the daily one you just posted.

Efficiency =/= fun imo.

Efficiency =/= fun imo.

 

Then what's your suggestion?

 

TBH, efficiency is the most fun - there's nothing fun about doing slow skills if you can monster hunt and do them multiple times faster and not have to make prayer potions or clean herbs all day to get cheap exp :(

If you somehow enjoy grinding for the sake of grinding and reject any attempt to forward a method that improves net time spent doing things other than grinding by increasing the speed at which one grinds...

 

Then you have no right to talk about fun unless you actually don't understand what you're saying, which is often the case.

 

I'm about to run out of matches from burning down all these straw men. Please don't put up another one in my view.

I don't mind efficiency, but I think everyone draws a personal line where efficiency turns into major cash loss. It's a rough subject in my books, but I tend to do things such as for example gold ore from 96 to 99 because I only lose 7m gp and had I not done battlestaves for crafting I might have saved a good hunk of those bars to make jeweled rings. I'm wierd like that...

Properly calculating efficiency takes cost into account.

Efficiency =/= fun imo.

Good for you. Except it has nothing to do with this and you didn't contribute to the discussion at all.

 

Properly calculating efficiency takes cost into account.

This.