Lowelife0 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Me and litterly everyone in my school fight about what is the better first person shooter. I say FEAR rocks, but my friend thinks otherwize! So vote I say, vote! Stats: Both games have the best look they can have right now. Call of duty has real war action. FEAR is frighteninly intence and a little...disturbing. But thats what I like in game :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammy316 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Call of duty 2. Why? Because I <3 Call of Duty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awef Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 I've played and beaten both. I preferred FEAR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
runesmithie Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 From the story department it looks like FEAR wins I just posted something! ^_^ to the terrorist...er... kirbybeam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lowelife0 Posted February 15, 2006 Author Share Posted February 15, 2006 Yup, FEAR it is. 8) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LP Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 Story + Single player = Fear Decent Story, GREAT online, Good replay value. - COD2 Also i must reccoment Battlefeild 2.. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blade995 Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 Story line and game play= FEAR Multiplayer and considered best WWII fps= call of duty2 FEAR can get intense, thats why I like it :) . The scary part makes all games better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyPurpleCrayon Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 Aren't they completely different in every way? Ghost: I am prejudice towards ignorance, so that would explain why I appear to be so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nadril Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 Preaty much MPC. Imo, COD 2 is just a rehashed sequal of the origonal. It's very short as well. I haven't played FEAR, so I can't comment on that one, but I guess... FEAR wins? Oh well, they are both incredibly different FPS's, one being a horror and one being another WW II FPS.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LP Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 Preaty much MPC. Imo, COD 2 is just a rehashed sequal of the origonal. It's very short as well. play it on veteran and beat it like me :) http://live.xbox.com/member/Pink Floyd 08 < -- proof within :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammy316 Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 Preaty much MPC. Imo, COD 2 is just a rehashed sequal of the origonal. It's very short as well. I haven't played FEAR, so I can't comment on that one, but I guess... FEAR wins? Oh well, they are both incredibly different FPS's, one being a horror and one being another WW II FPS.... Try it on hardest settings. And play COD 2 MP ;). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nadril Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 Don't belive it would be that hard, although not going out to pay 50$ for it to do so lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necromagus Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 Meh, those two really don't have enough in common to make any kind of real comparison. Besides, there's no accounting for taste, so the whole debate seems rather pointless... My Tip.It Times Articles (10 and counting) || The Varrock Library Author Index projectDo you dare to dream? - Part 19 added. || The Hospital (WIP) - New story!Necromagus looks like a viking ... with glasses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr_Putter Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 I'm still trying to beat all the games of the past 7 years or so...I got all the best games of 2004 finished...Many from 2003...And I'm playing so many RPGS...But when I get to the point where I get to 2005, I'm going to probably buy whatever's cheaper first (I saw directors cut of FEAR for 78$ at EB games and I nearly pooped.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ford_rule Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 78 dollars lol, in aus we pay 99 for a new game which is around 75 dollars us lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now