Jump to content

rune str pures VS. str pures with 1 def


un4given

Recommended Posts

I've been debating about this topic ever since i created my str pure a few months ago. I've started with my lvl 1 def pure thinking that I'll stick to training att and str without ever training def. Now I'm starting to have second thoughts. After using almost 1m worth of lobbies I've been thinking of raising his defence to a rune pure. Now I've seen rune pures in action while fighting them on my main. Most of them were 90+ with lvl 40 def and high str and att hitting straight 15+'s, making most of their opponents tele away and killing some of them with killer KO's(20+). I thought wow I should make my pure that way. But later I thought it might be bad in the long run (gaining permanent 40 def+and increase in combat lvl). But i also thought of the benefits, less use of food for training, more protection when pking besides the full iron or monk's that most str pures wear, and others i can think of atm. I'm sure a lot of you are more experienced with these pures than the simple "just raise your str higher than everything else". So please leave some advice that will help me and others who are questioning whether they should become rune str pures or the simple str pure with 1 def. (I say str pures loosely because I know that there are different hybrids out there with high magic/range along with str). Thanx and happy scaping =p

Disregard females.

 

Acquire currency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1def is pointless, you just get hit more..Who cares if your lower combat..its pointless..

All Quests completed

99 Thieving achieved on January 10th, 2008

99 Defense achieved on August 3rd, 2008

85 Slayer achieved on July 31st, 2008

6 Dragon boot drops, 14 Whip drops

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think 1 def pures are better, think of it this way. If you went ahead and got 40 def, you could of used them 40 levels and put them twords strength. So you could be lets say 80 str, 60 att, 1 def or 40 str, 60 att, 40 def.

 

 

 

my level 50 hits constant 15s on people, so once im level 60 ill be hitting 22s. :)

 

 

 

so thats how i think of it...

 

 

 

less def lvls = more str :)

ipodsig0jv.png

beast2008: 100 combat - banned july 9th 2006

~R.I.P the old nite~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think 1 def pures are better, think of it this way. If you went ahead and got 40 def, you could of used them 40 levels and put them twords strength. So you could be lets say 80 str, 60 att, 1 def or 40 str, 60 att, 40 def.

 

 

 

my level 50 hits constant 15s on people, so once im level 60 ill be hitting 22s. :)

 

 

 

so thats how i think of it...

 

 

 

less def lvls = more str :)

 

 

 

sorry to be a bummer to you bro.... but do you know how many hit levels you gain gettting to 80 str compared to getting to 40 def...

Did you heard about the kidnaping last night? no? well the kid just fell assleep.... :D lol...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think 1 def pures are better, think of it this way. If you went ahead and got 40 def, you could of used them 40 levels and put them twords strength. So you could be lets say 80 str, 60 att, 1 def or 40 str, 60 att, 40 def.

 

 

 

my level 50 hits constant 15s on people, so once im level 60 ill be hitting 22s. :)

 

 

 

so thats how i think of it...

 

 

 

less def lvls = more str :)

 

 

 

sorry to be a bummer to you bro.... but do you know how many hit levels you gain gettting to 80 str compared to getting to 40 def...

Plus, 1 def level DOES NOT equal 1 str or attack level. In rs1 it did, but rs2 is diferent. I have a rune pure, and they're good if you can pk well

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~Bepo

Because bepo is always right

 

RSN: Z A M 0 (it's a zero)

74 att - 45 def - 76 str - 72 hp - 52 pray - 91 magic

Feel free to give me a shout, private is always ON

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rune pures are good at 90+ str and 70+ attack and MEMBERS, i had a rune pure on f2p and it was impossible to get a good pk, but at members, you got all those pots and pray ... rune pures simply own P2P

 

This post should be at graveyard help (or something like that)

 

 

 

I agree with this guy. Rune pures simly own in P2P

Wondering what to do with life .....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe a 1 def attack pure would be good. Something with 80 attack. That can hit often on both 1 def and 40 def.

Dagganoth Kings Drops: Berserker Ring (x1) D Axe (x2) Seercull (x1) Archer Ring (x1) Seers Ring (x1) Mud staff (x1)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think def 1 pures are better cause there outfit isnt as expensive so you will probalbly end up with more cash then you woud have as a rune pure cause if you die as a rune pure you will lose far more money

king+ivar7.png

wc rulezzzzzzzzzz:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rune pures are great fun sure, but they have a problem. They are bound to wearing either blkc hides or rune armor, otherwise they lose the advantage of thier def (it being to low to be of real value without the armor). However, def noobs, who wear robes most of the time, can mage rune pures, who usualy have to run. However, I think rune pures own def pures of a same level in melee - def is a skill far often too underated.

magecape,Mo%20Gui%20Gui.gif

mo%20gui%20gui.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rune pures are good at 90+ str and 70+ attack and MEMBERS, i had a rune pure on f2p and it was impossible to get a good pk, but at members, you got all those pots and pray ... rune pures simply own P2P

 

This post should be at graveyard help (or something like that)

 

 

 

My rune pure was 65 70 45...And I owned 8-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rune pures are good at 90+ str and 70+ attack and MEMBERS, i had a rune pure on f2p and it was impossible to get a good pk, but at members, you got all those pots and pray ... rune pures simply own P2P

 

This post should be at graveyard help (or something like that)

 

 

 

My rune pure was 65 70 45...And I owned 8-)

 

 

 

Question: Why 45?

boratto.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a pker/staker on Classic with 30 strength, 50 attack and 50 def...he honestly owned. I haven't done much PKing on RS2, but I'd say go for the rune. If you're afraid of dying and losing your armor...well, don't die. The rewards outweigh the risks considerably.

I really wouldn't call it an era. It was more of a definitive time period during which dinstinctive characteristics were expressed in similar ways.

Svirnsigscore.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rune pures are good at 90+ str and 70+ attack and MEMBERS, i had a rune pure on f2p and it was impossible to get a good pk, but at members, you got all those pots and pray ... rune pures simply own P2P

 

This post should be at graveyard help (or something like that)

 

 

 

My rune pure was 65 70 45...And I owned 8-)

 

 

 

Question: Why 45?

 

 

 

Berserker helm if not mistaken.

Retired

2146 overall - 136 combat - 6 skillcapes

 

Plus I think the whole teenage girl thing will end soon (hopefully), because my girlfriend is absolutely in love with him(she is 18), and im beginning to feel threatened by his [Justin Bieber] dashing looks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

umm is it me or is everyone thinking that every lvl has the same exp to get to the next lvl

 

 

 

60 attck 80 str and 1 def is pure

 

 

 

why is everyone saying that you can get

 

90 attck and 90 str its not the same exp you'll probally get

 

65 attck and 85 str ...

randomkcopyq.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.