November 5, 200718 yr I thought of something better. Change the damage to chance to hit and higher chance to hit max damage. So three choices: Option 1: Front: Multiply dam done by 1. side:x1.5 backx2 Don't like idea, one hitting will be numerous. Option 2: Front:x1 side:apprx.x1.25 back:approx. x1.4 This ones a good idea, No one hitting here! Option 3: Front:No diff. Side: slightly increased chance of hitting your max hit or close. Back:Increased chance of hitting your max hit or close This one's the best :D
November 5, 200718 yr I thought of something better. Change the damage to chance to hit and higher chance to hit max damage. So three choices: Option 1: Front: Multiply dam done by 1. side:x1.5 backx2 Don't like idea, one hitting will be numerous. Option 2: Front:x1 side:apprx.x1.25 back:approx. x1.4 This ones a good idea, No one hitting here! Option 3: Front:No diff. Side: slightly increased chance of hitting your max hit or close. Back:Increased chance of hitting your max hit or close This one's the best :D There might be some more people will be thinking the same thing as you. So I'll explain it myself. Chance to hit/hit higher/hit max: Front: X 100%. Side: X 150%. Back: X 200%. FTP player.Goal:85/90 smithing. 12,000,000/100,000,000 coins.Total hacked and scammed losses:1 billion coins +/- (Not in today's currency).
November 6, 200718 yr I thought of something better. Change the damage to chance to hit and higher chance to hit max damage. So three choices: Option 1: Front: Multiply dam done by 1. side:x1.5 backx2 Don't like idea, one hitting will be numerous. Option 2: Front:x1 side:apprx.x1.25 back:approx. x1.4 This ones a good idea, No one hitting here! Option 3: Front:No diff. Side: slightly increased chance of hitting your max hit or close. Back:Increased chance of hitting your max hit or close This one's the best :D There might be some more people will be thinking the same thing as you. So I'll explain it myself. Chance to hit/hit higher/hit max: Front: X 100%. Side: X 150%. Back: X 200%. Umm, I think that if it was 100% you would be hitting ur opp 100% max hits. So 200% would double ur max hit. I believe that it woudl be more like: Front: X 25%. Side: X 50%. Back: X 75%. so that it is a 25% chance for you to hit max/high hit on ur opp, which is still alot, a 1/4 chance. Lord of Lords, Lord Firer (Shadow Stalker) You are awesome for putting "~Shadow" in your signature and not at the bottom of your posts ~Shadow
November 6, 200718 yr I thought of something better. Change the damage to chance to hit and higher chance to hit max damage. So three choices: Option 1: Front: Multiply dam done by 1. side:x1.5 backx2 Don't like idea, one hitting will be numerous. Option 2: Front:x1 side:apprx.x1.25 back:approx. x1.4 This ones a good idea, No one hitting here! Option 3: Front:No diff. Side: slightly increased chance of hitting your max hit or close. Back:Increased chance of hitting your max hit or close This one's the best :D There might be some more people will be thinking the same thing as you. So I'll explain it myself. Chance to hit/hit higher/hit max: Front: X 100%. Side: X 150%. Back: X 200%. Umm, I think that if it was 100% you would be hitting ur opp 100% max hits. So 200% would double ur max hit. I believe that it woudl be more like: Front: X 25%. Side: X 50%. Back: X 75%. so that it is a 25% chance for you to hit max/high hit on ur opp, which is still alot, a 1/4 chance. Lord of Lords, Lord Firer (Shadow Stalker) You got the wrong idea. 100% = Same as now. 150% = 1.5 times more chance. 200% = 2 times more chance. Anyway you also got your point. Just that you misunderstood me. FTP player.Goal:85/90 smithing. 12,000,000/100,000,000 coins.Total hacked and scammed losses:1 billion coins +/- (Not in today's currency).
November 6, 200718 yr You are sorta using % in the wrong way, but what ever :D. I over all don't believe that this should happen, and anyway, how do you propose this to happen. Will people just run around the back or what? You are awesome for putting "~Shadow" in your signature and not at the bottom of your posts ~Shadow
November 6, 200718 yr You are sorta using % in the wrong way, but what ever :D. I over all don't believe that this should happen, and anyway, how do you propose this to happen. Will people just run around the back or what? Not really. It's just that you only think of the hit max part. You should read again carefully. FTP player.Goal:85/90 smithing. 12,000,000/100,000,000 coins.Total hacked and scammed losses:1 billion coins +/- (Not in today's currency).
November 7, 200817 yr I don't think that random weapon speeds should be added, I think that would add to much of a 'luck' aspect to combat. I've seen vids of P2P players pking, and it seems enough to not know weather your opponent's gonna spring out a godsword or dark bow and spec ya. As for the 'Damage Modifiers Based on Angle of Attack' idea, I'm rather on the fence with that. For PVP, it'd be interesting, but at the same time if you do x2 damage from the back, then you could easily 1hit KO someone with a AGS spec from behind. 100% F2P99 Defense, Tuesday February 10th 200999 Attack, Tuesday May 26th 200962,189th to get it
November 7, 200817 yr Great idea, full support! :thumbsup: Maybe there could be a Speed Potion, which could increase the chance of hitting faster! : I also like the idea of the slash marks, but I think that should take much coding. Proud owner of the Quest Cape since 31/08Quest suggestion: The Shadow of a Delver
November 7, 200817 yr Front: X 100%. Side: X 150%. Back: X 200%. Front: X 25%. Side: X 50%. Back: X 75%. What about having an increased chance to hit somewhat more as the original hit? Front: +0% Side: +15% Back: +30% Example: You hit 20, when you attack from back, you could hit 26. Love/hate? ;) EDIT: To make cheating not possible, it would only count for the FIRST hit on the side/back. Proud owner of the Quest Cape since 31/08Quest suggestion: The Shadow of a Delver
November 7, 200817 yr Looks like a good idea. And a heads up, this thread is back from 2006. It died for a year, bumped, and died for a year, then resurrected this year :roll: 99 Crafting :: 39,750th || 99 Attack :: 1,775th
November 7, 200817 yr Author Looks like a good idea. And a heads up, this thread is back from 2006. It died for a year, bumped, and died for a year, then resurrected this year :roll: Yeah, I never like to see my suggestion die permanently so I am happy to see people take an interest, all my suggestions are link in my blog so periodicly they come back to life. :D [spoiler=Stats:]Updated December 22, 2011: Total level - 1442 - 170M+ XP , Combat level - 115Combat skills: Attack - 90, Defence - 99 (24.45m+ XP), Strength - 90, Constitution - 99 (16.42M+ XP) Ranged - 99 (13.32M+ XP), Prayer - 60, Magic - 99 (13.25M+ XP)Non-Combat skills: Cooking - 99 (13.80M+ XP), Woodcutting - 99 (31.95M+ XP), Fishing - 90, Firemaking - 99 (24.82M+), Crafting - 90, Smithing - 90, Mining - 85, Runecrafting - 60, Dungeoneering - 85
November 8, 200817 yr I've never though of that, but now that you mentioned it, it sounds very promising. Support. Main: Snw rifleman - FINISHED DESERT TRESURE 11/5/08 WOO Just your typical asian who likes to play games =)
Create an account or sign in to comment