I personally don't agree with Bush. Not because he is sending more troops.Because he needs to send even more to get the job done.

 

 

 

(By the way, I do support Bush all the way lol)

Pre-invasion: Evil dictator who commits mass genocide on his people in Iraq. A large amount of terror networks operating in lots of different places and attacking American civilians on American soil.

 

 

 

... an example of which would be?

 

 

 

Post-invasion: No evil dictator who commits mass genocide on his people in Iraq. A large amount of terror networks have concentrated their efforts into one single country which is easier to fight and are attacking American troops who are able to defend themselves instead of American civilians who are slaughtered.

 

 

 

How many Iraqi civilians were found dead and tortured this week. Anyone?

... an example of which would be?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

That was poorly phrased on my part in an attempt to make the sentence concise. My point with that sentence was that multiple terror organizations existed before the invasion and the attacks against America were not centralized and some happened on American soil. Compared to now, attacks against America have been centralized in an area away from American soil.

Did anyone watch it? so what is the surge strategy?

The idea of sending more troops in for another push has so many similarities with the series of Blackadder it's frightening.

 

 

 

That was poorly phrased on my part in an attempt to make the sentence concise. My point with that sentence was that multiple terror organizations existed before the invasion and the attacks against America were not centralized and some happened on American soil. Compared to now, attacks against America have been centralized in an area away from American soil.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So... The Iraqi civilians dying to these terrorist attacks that are being redirected from American soil are what exactly?

I think hes a poof, why dont he go himself?

 

 

 

 

That was poorly phrased on my part in an attempt to make the sentence concise. My point with that sentence was that multiple terror organizations existed before the invasion and the attacks against America were not centralized and some happened on American soil. Compared to now, attacks against America have been centralized in an area away from American soil.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So... The Iraqi civilians dying to these terrorist attacks that are being redirected from American soil are what exactly?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Are these different than the Iraqi civilians dying to Saddam's hands?

America created this mess and took responsibility for it. If they pull out now, they will be cowards. Iraq needs more security. But mostly, it needs more money to rebuild, so that it can be a stable country by itself. I should remind you that the American people supported the war at the outset, not just the government, so don't just blame Bush.

So true, I remember how many people were pro war shortly after 9/11, now everybody is using the government as a scape goat and pretending like it was all their idea to go there. Pretty sad :S

I really don't think you understand why the US went to Iraq tigra.

 

 

 

Who does? Truthfully?

 

... an example of which would be?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

That was poorly phrased on my part in an attempt to make the sentence concise. My point with that sentence was that multiple terror organizations existed before the invasion and the attacks against America were not centralized and some happened on American soil. Compared to now, attacks against America have been centralized in an area away from American soil.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You truly believe that there have been no terrorist plots to kill Americans on American soil (or Britons {before or after the war} on British soil) since the start of the Iraq war? What do you think your (and our) secret services are doing all day? They're saving our butts by monitoring and neutralising these threats.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P.S. Is there any way the spell-checker on these forums can be taught NOT to keep telling me that my "s"s should be "z"s?

 

 

 

P.P.S. Or is it the fault of my Windows dictionary?

 

America created this mess and took responsibility for it. If they pull out now, they will be cowards. Iraq needs more security. But mostly, it needs more money to rebuild, so that it can be a stable country by itself. I should remind you that the American people supported the war at the outset, not just the government, so don't just blame Bush.

So true, I remember how many people were pro war shortly after 9/11, now everybody is using the government as a scape goat and pretending like it was all their idea to go there. Pretty sad :S

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I remember everyone being anti war from the start, it depends on where you're from.

 

 

America created this mess and took responsibility for it. If they pull out now, they will be cowards. Iraq needs more security. But mostly, it needs more money to rebuild, so that it can be a stable country by itself. I should remind you that the American people supported the war at the outset, not just the government, so don't just blame Bush.

So true, I remember how many people were pro war shortly after 9/11, now everybody is using the government as a scape goat and pretending like it was all their idea to go there. Pretty sad :S

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I remember everyone being anti war from the start, it depends on where you're from.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

USA Today reported that around 76% of America supported the war when the United States invaded. You can argue about whether or not the support came from being mislead or not, but the country overwhelming supported the invasion.

Are these different than the Iraqi civilians dying to Saddam's hands?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*shrug* Dead is dead, no matter the cause or reason as far as I'm concerned. ÃÆÃâÃâÃ