Wouter828

You get bored in a public toilet often eh? I think I can stop peeing in mid-stream, harder when sitting that when standing though.

This is quite sick and disturbing. Suicide's a sad thing if it's committed by a young life with all options open.

So true. Criminals can actually sue homeowners for getting injured while breaking into their house and WIN. #-o That's messed up. I think that if the person set out to kill someone but stopped themselves from doing it they should get a lesser punishment than a guy who tried it and tripped over a needle and thus missing the target, for example.

I wasn't talking about it being harder or not, I was talking about being successful in your search or not. Someone who wants to prove something exists is searching for 'something' and by his believes will eventually find something, making his search successful. Whereas someone trying to prove something doesn't exist can search the whole universe looking for 'nothing' and still not prove it 'isn't there'. The model my teacher used were clouds and God. A Monotheist looking for God searches cloud after cloud and can actually find God eventually (according to his beliefs), while an atheist can only prove that it he's not under that cloud. He'd have to search each and every cloud and still wouldn't be certain that God doesn't exist since he's only proven that God doesn't exist under that cloud.

If that's all he taught you,then 1-he's a lazy bastard, 2-you've wasted monies. For example,I can say magic exists,but so far all evidence points to it doesn't exist,because two thousand years of random discovery,about four hundred of searching (applied) discovery show no evidence towards evidence. On the other hand,existence is harder to prove because its all perception,see.Psychics mostly say ghosts exist because they see them,but we do not,so many of us doubt their existence.How can you prove those that see them aren't perceiving other objects as ghosts?Or,how do you prove those that aren't are unable to perceive ghosts at all? See? no

According to the rules of filosofy which my teacher explained to me, you're bound to be more succesful in looking to prove that something exists than to prove that something doesn't exist. Therefore I'm gonna go with yeah, time exists.

Sure you aren't thinking of the Playboy Bunny Mansion? Because that isn't a brothel, it's just a place for [bleep]s to live and... do other stuff. No, not Hugh's crib. This one's run by a big bald guy. Found a picture of the guy with someone named judith regan? on google: Obviously the person left is the big bald guy I was talking about.

lolwut there's random ppls on teh interwebz?! and they add people to seem popular? nowaaiiii

My parents are too complicated to explain, lets just stick to them being nice, well educaided but not that good looking but nothing horrible (thank the Lord :pray: ). They're both smart and in for a joke. Dad's sometimes a bit like a child lol.

As far as I'm concerned you must have a serious lack of parenting and communication skills if you must hit someone much weaker than you to either gain respect or get your point across. That method also teaches that if you want something done then use violence, and where does that get us? Might as well beat your spouse if they do something out of line :roll: No that method teaches "I've told you 5 times to stop climbing onto everything, you didn't stop and you got punished" Seriously were you never hit as a child for being bad? It's not like you punch them in the face or anything just smack their [wagon] a little and make them sit in a corner for 5 minutes and when you progress into your teenage years 5 minutes turn into weeks/months. This method has taught me to listen to adults when they tell you to do something. I think they should bring back the paddle in schools -.- Why not just sit in the corner for 5 minutes? Why 'smack your kids [wagon] a little' aswell? I was never hit by my mother and I still listened to her eventually. Most parents just don't have the patience. because 99.9% of children have a "Oh big deal, she's not going to do anything to me except put me in a corner" mentality. The hitting will make the child not want to be hit again, thus will try harder not to do what got him in trouble. How does a kid compare it to anything worse when you haven't done anything like that to the kid before? Standing in the corner might be taken as worse as getting hit, by a kid who has never been hit before. If you don't give it anything to compare the kid sumply can't. Also, standing in the corner is often very effective in combination with talking to the kid why you've punished it that way and what shouldn't be done next time. You should watch one of those programs about raising kids, you know, when the professional comes over to teach desperate helpless, children hitting parents to do it the right and effective way. Hit the child, make them stand in corner, talk to them about what they did. All 3 work well when put together. Hitting them shows dominance which a parent must have, having time-out is the punishment, and talking to them afterwards makes them understand what they did wrong and why not to do it again. It does not show dominance, maybe to the kid, and even then only at the moment, but in a world full of grown ups your just a sad person not able of handeling their kid without using the violent way. And in the end your kids grow up to be an ethic failure and a problem to society.

And you remind me of people who still think text constitutes sound. :-$ And you remind me of my 10 year old little brother taking every word literally

As far as I'm concerned you must have a serious lack of parenting and communication skills if you must hit someone much weaker than you to either gain respect or get your point across. That method also teaches that if you want something done then use violence, and where does that get us? Might as well beat your spouse if they do something out of line :roll: No that method teaches "I've told you 5 times to stop climbing onto everything, you didn't stop and you got punished" Seriously were you never hit as a child for being bad? It's not like you punch them in the face or anything just smack their [wagon] a little and make them sit in a corner for 5 minutes and when you progress into your teenage years 5 minutes turn into weeks/months. This method has taught me to listen to adults when they tell you to do something. I think they should bring back the paddle in schools -.- Why not just sit in the corner for 5 minutes? Why 'smack your kids [wagon] a little' aswell? I was never hit by my mother and I still listened to her eventually. Most parents just don't have the patience. because 99.9% of children have a "Oh big deal, she's not going to do anything to me except put me in a corner" mentality. The hitting will make the child not want to be hit again, thus will try harder not to do what got him in trouble. How does a kid compare it to anything worse when you haven't done anything like that to the kid before? Standing in the corner might be taken as worse as getting hit, by a kid who has never been hit before. If you don't give it anything to compare the kid sumply can't. Also, standing in the corner is often very effective in combination with talking to the kid why you've punished it that way and what shouldn't be done next time. You should watch one of those programs about raising kids, you know, when the professional comes over to teach desperate helpless, children hitting parents to do it the right and effective way.

Sure you aren't thinking of the Playboy Bunny Mansion? Because that isn't a brothel, it's just a place for [bleep]s to live and... do other stuff. No, not Hugh's crib. This one's run by a big bald guy.

As far as I'm concerned you must have a serious lack of parenting and communication skills if you must hit someone much weaker than you to either gain respect or get your point across. That method also teaches that if you want something done then use violence, and where does that get us? Might as well beat your spouse if they do something out of line :roll: No that method teaches "I've told you 5 times to stop climbing onto everything, you didn't stop and you got punished" Seriously were you never hit as a child for being bad? It's not like you punch them in the face or anything just smack their [wagon] a little and make them sit in a corner for 5 minutes and when you progress into your teenage years 5 minutes turn into weeks/months. This method has taught me to listen to adults when they tell you to do something. I think they should bring back the paddle in schools -.- Why not just sit in the corner for 5 minutes? Why 'smack your kids [wagon] a little' aswell? I was never hit by my mother and I still listened to her eventually. Most parents just don't have the patience.

This comes a little bit too close to the moral value usually stashed in a pokemon episode

no u

Well parenting can be blamed. The parents nurturing and not wanting to yell at their kids because "It's not right." The kids then grow up thinking that they can do anything and have no respect. Another reason is parents not smacking kids. I hate that. If you do something wrong, you get smacked. Not "Tommy, stealing is wrong and you should think before you do it next time. Ok? I love you precious." Just smack the kid. They'll learn. That is not the way it works. Hitting a child won't teach him anything other than that violence is THE way to get what you want and that hitting people to make them do things is nothing short of normal. My mom has never hit me, she always told me what was and what wasn't acceptable, and if I got into a fight with her we might've gotten very angry at eachother, but she never used her hands, only words or punishment in the form of no pocket money or go to your room. The need of a parent using violence to make a his kid do what he wants is a very sad example of a very sad person, powerless in words against a 3 year old. They have an undeveloped sense of cause => consequence and don't reason like adults. A hard hand won't help develop that part of the brain. Your kid doesn't listen to you and doesn't seem to understand your reasoning or why rules exist, what wrong or right it? No waaaaii! Just give him a good smack, so he really feels the pain, and not just once, if he ever does it again just hit him even harder so that everytime he gets the urge sometime in his life, he'll remember the pain. Sure, that should do him good. Say what? He hit a girl in school for taking his candy? I wonder where he learnt that behaviour! Time for a good spanking. :roll: Parents like that have issues.

Well, I think the policy here (The Netherlands) goes by population in a city. Meaning like 30000 inhabitants of the city = 2 brothels allowed. In my city 2 brothels are allowed I think, the last one closed down a few years ago because there was no demand though. I'd say prostitution should be lagalized since not every person feels like building up a relationship with someone just to have sex. Some people are too lazy I'd think. We'd have to ask an actual costumer to know his motives though since most of us can only speculate. Also in America the best example of legalized prostitution is the so called 'Bunny Ranch'. I've seen a documentary about it, the girls seemed pretty happy and it seemed quite hygienic. So in my opinion prostitution should be legalized in brothels, not on the street. Not necessarily... Like back in the old days when there were prostitutes everywhere out in the open, men on long trips through let's say France would take in a mistress while he's at his hotel. It was pretty common, and it wasn't necessarily because he couldn't get a woman lol. We're in 2008. And some people still can't get a woman. rape is sex too. that would be inconsentual sex which usually goes with violence, and that IS immoral, in my opinion anyway.

+1 I has an innie, someone count the innies and outies :P

all generalisations are bad.

You're an animal! Oh and bob wants his female you trained for him ;)

beer heer pls

I see you at the moment, you have a nice hp cape and a crabhand : And hey I saw Sith aswell yesterday :o Grats on 92

now we're the same smithing level

1/10, why wuzn't I invited :( Grats