NoMoreDead

Someone ought to slap you. READ: http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/o ... 30.article

Wow. I hope you're: 1. Joking 2.Uneducated 3. A younger TIF'er still agreeing with parents' biased views I'm gonna go with #3 As someone who often ends up debating with Saru, I must say #3 is indeed correct.

[hide=] Our debt is not going to get to zero during Obama's term. Both candidates will raise the debt for sure. It is not free health care. You have to pay taxes for it. Also, don't think you'll get your treatment right away. Have fun waiting for about three months (or longer) for other people to get what they need before your even considered. Hm...that sounds a lot like... Our current situation. Actually, with private providers, you only have to wait a few days to get an appointment and maybe a week to get treated. [/hide] It will be similar under Obama's plan. It really only affects those who are in desperate need of a life saving transplant/surgery/ect. A simple in-and-out for the common cold or flu will be quite similar.

Our debt is not going to get to zero during Obama's term. Both candidates will raise the debt for sure. It is not free health care. You have to pay taxes for it. Also, don't think you'll get your treatment right away. Have fun waiting for about three months (or longer) for other people to get what they need before your even considered. Hm...that sounds a lot like... Our current situation.

YAY! We're offically a country with a fraction of people who don't have a damn clue what Socialism is and refer to Obama as a "socialist" without knowing what the hell their talking about! YAY!

For the first time since 2001, I'm proud to be an American. That feeling won't last long, but damn it feels good for the time being.

It's over. No doubts about it. Now the question is what will the margin be.

Show me one phenominon that can't be explained by science that also disproves the theories of either evolution or the big bang and I'll be beyond impressed. Huh? Umm... Creation... Creation is not testible. Creation is an amazingly broad thing, anyway. Yet again you fail to provide testible, proven evidence.

Show me one phenominon that can't be explained by science that also disproves the theories of either evolution or the big bang and I'll be beyond impressed.

120 Combat: Dragon Skirt on task:

Some very impressive stuff there. Congrats, and keep going all the way to 99 :D!

So if you're born into wealth, power, or any pleasant living situation, god is to be praised, but if you're born into poverty and struggle, god is NOT to blame?

Nomoredead - A reference to an Anti-Flag song titled "No more dead". Also a reference to the Iraq war which, I believe, requires an immediate end. Nomoredead5 (Ingame name) - Same basic concept. The "5" is a reference to my baseball number and my "lucky" number.

You are so obviously wrong that it can hardly be put into words. Just because something cannot be explained by science at this moment in time does not mean that it won't ever be explained. There is no reason to label something "supernatural" or "devine" when, odds are, it will be disproven in a matter of weeks. So far, nothing has ever been tested that goes against what science leads us to believe about the world, it's origins, and the diversity of life. THIS is the ultimate bit of irony. You provide little to nothing in terms of sources when you make a point. You never even answered my post directed towards you telling me that I couldn't debate. I really suggest you get a reality check and realize that your detrimental to your own side.

Updated. Currently slaying.

During my most recent Aviansies trip: Ending result:

Thanks ETP! Always nice to see a TIF'er in game, especially someone as fun as you :P Glad to see I gave you an idea as well. Current aviansies trip is going to bring me an estimated 1.5M in cash, which will put me over the 40M GP mark in my bank.

-Ability to carry out a basic conversation without needing to use the words "Like, Um, or ...what..." every five seconds. -Liking me for me. -Physical attractiveness (A must in any situation). -An attention span.

I spied you :P

I founded-ded you :D :

[hide=] Quite possibly one of the worst defenses I've ever seen. You did not meet any of his points. And how did I not..? NoMoreDead is just looking for a fight, actually. [/hide] Actually, I'm looking for you to back up your points with factual evidence, something which you seem to have some sort of issue with.

Thursday. :P It's cool Ouchy, take all the time you need :D

94 HP :D!

Does your keyboard also make you place commas in the wrong places? I can't debate? This is coming from someone who actually believes that the sun stood in the sky for a day, and then provides biased sources which, much like the person posting links to them, provides no factual evidence to back up it's claim. I can't debate? This is coming from the person who thinks that having a good grade in high school Biology put him on par with top scientists around the world. "Just because you can't comprehend something doesn't mean it can't exist", right? I can't debate? This is coming from the person who consistently provides hearsay evidence and proceeds to act like those sources are infallible. Without providing sound, scientific evidence your claims are nothing to the educated community. I can't debate? This is coming from the person who has resorted to name calling more than any other person involved in the topic, and acts as if he's defeated the other person's point. Abiogenesis? http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/abioprob.html http://www.bio-medicine.org/biology-def ... iogenesis/ Abiogenesis is NOT, NOT, NOT something coming from nothing. Modern science does not consider Aristotelian abiogensis to be the modern, working definition, as it is easily disproven. "The modern definition of abiogenesis is concerned with the formation of the simplest forms of life from primordial chemicals. This is a significantly different thing from the concept of Aristotelian abiogenesis, which postulated the formation of complex organisms." Still don't understand? I suggest you read up. It's not acceptable to be willingfully ignorant of what's going on in the field of modern science, and debate as if you are well informed.

And you spelled 'just' wrong. Plus you actually said "Why me never know". Now spelling errors have nothing to do with the validity of a statement, but not being able to comprehend what you were trying to say hinders my ability to debate with you. All you've given in terms of information is hearsay. You've given opinions from unknown and totally unreliable sources. YOU rarely have anything to say besides "I heard from someone that...". It seems a bit contradictory to tell people they don't supply facts when you do nothing of the sort.