Lenticular_J

If a man is kicked there and does not go fetal, he is now a she.

I want to be a producer just to stop the same damn cliches. Why can't evil win? Why can't there be a movie with no conflict, just a guy living a perfect life? Yeah. Think about it.

To quote a wise man - "Who gives a [bleep]?" Just do it for the lulz, if you have to. Quit asking these questions and go do stuff. I'll watch from my computer.

You know, that's true. If those two could be combined. Oh [cabbage]. Anyways, if we could do that, as well as make the battles and choices able to be viewed like that pre-rendered trailer movie... That would be my ultimate game.

Well, these days, any textbook that isn't brand-new (particularly things like theories and difficult scientific work) will be outdated within two years.

You don't want to buy anything technologically empowered with this name.

They aren't easter eggs so much as anti-counterfeit measures. Extreme, yes, but it can help people save millions. Anyways, there are tons of these. I can't think of any at the moment.

That is so epic. I can't wait for it. That is awesome, I just want some proof for that, the video would have mentioned it if it existed, but it only mentioned up to 12. I read it somewhere either on the website or the ranking I saw of the ten most wanted games for the fall (where I found out about this). I'll try to find a link. I believe the video only says the battles themselves had up to twelve players. Whole wars can carry many many many.

Yeah, I haven't thought about it like killing myself, but I've definitely decided I want to be the first person to die in the way that I die. If that makes sense.

[hide=Trailer.] [/hide] Wikipedia. Led by creative director Michael Plater, from Rome: Total War. This looks like it'll redefine strategy for the new generation. Has HUGE ideas for multiplayer. As in hundreds of players fighting wars lasting months. It comes out relatively soon: November 4th. Very good-looking graphics as well. Is anyone planning on getting it? I've told my parents it's one thing I particularly want for Christmas. This is the game I look forward to most, after Fable 2. And it's coming with some serious names and developers to back it up. I think this could be the real deal. Soon after this, we'll have my dream - strategy games like this where you can be the soldier, commander, or both seamlessly. Some have said this is basically an interactive movie - but you could also call Metal Gear Solid 4 the same - and it has sold millions of copies and gotten great reviews. This looks like it'll rawk my sawk. Singular. EDIT: Oh, and you can use your voice to play the game. They've developed it enough that parrots have been taught to play the game relatively well.

That's a stupid test. If you answer the top of them all, you'll end up super happy. Psychology tests can't be like that. I got a 22 though, mainly because of the sleep-lack questions.

I know the current teen generation's parents will know more about sex then we do - possibly ever. They grew up in the 60's, 70's, 80's, and some 90's. Come on. Literally? ;) On a related note, I never knew how many kids were having sex at my school. Not the ones I hang around with, but a lot of the stereotypes are true. It feels wierd to not be crazy and wanting to hump everything in sight. Also - when I was younger, me and my friends scoffed at the thought that people would try to do things that "got around virginity". Sex, well, ya know. But it happens. A lot. 'S crazy.

Have to say your diction says otherwise there. (Go English class! :)

Definitely George Michael.

Because of the huge physical, mental, emotional, and general maturity differences between those ages. Are you both in high school, though? That's relatively common. If she's in junior high, that's a bit wierder. Mainly because of how hard it will be for you two to see each other, and just how odd it sounds, despite the relatively small age difference. If you both think it'll work (think of it like two hormonal, crazy teenagers dammit), good for you. Git'er'dun.

I still don't understand how that evolves into sentience. I understand most of evolution, but the very beginnings, and I guess what we could call the present (human self-consciousness), just confuse the hell out of me on how it could happen so coldly and - well, not artificially. But you know what I mean. I just think there had to have been a little spark somewhere, even if it wasn't God. Plus, what we know is our best guess. Perhaps some really crazy [cabbage] went on back billions of years ago, and we just can't comprehend it.

Ah, okay. I figured there was a hypothesis or something for it, but I wasn't sure, so I thought, "Maybe Darwin just said [bleep] that, I won't go that far." I'll look it up, too.

I just don't understand the most base form of (a Godless) evolution: How was the very first cell created? Did it just pop up out of nothing? EDIT: Godless evolution.

You really shouldn't have posted that. Now a lot of us will think of you watching said pr0n when we're being offered cupcakes by our life-long lovers. See what you do? EDIT: Just like to to say, I told you so.

...Awesome.

Nothing better to do, to be honest. And one or two of you would look cute with no clothes on. I know I'm not an oldie. Just thought you Lent-worshippers wanted to know something about me. <3

Whoa, never knew there was people euthanasia. But Zierro's right. There's always gonna be someone who wants to die, whether they have a ridiculous reason or a good one. Nobody knows what's on the other side, so I'd never be one to kill a person unless I absolutely had to, but, dang. At least this is better than hanging.

Had to love that extra point in the overtime.

Can't really compare drugs to each other (well, those lighter drugs that make up much of the debate here). They're all bad for you, but not extremely.

Probably a good thing put to use badly, like the no-smoke cigarettes of the late eighties.