Dizzle229

Like I said earlier, it IS better than I gave it credit for, it's just that scene that bothered me.

Post pics either way :thumbup:

Should I just delete everything in my jagex_cache_32 folder? Edit: NVM, fix'D.

What attack style are you using during this? Agressive I think, whichever trains str.

I love Forsaken chat

Sorry if this thread was dead, but.... ... while on a slayer task at basilisks I noticed that they can hit on you regularly if you start a fight and try to walk away, even if you have a mirror shield equipped.

I hope this still gets finished. Just out of curiosity, what took them 10 years to make this game?

I think I do have them. It's weird, I was playing all night last night and now it's too unpredictable. If I die I lose dboots :wall:

This guy brought back so many memories http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videol ... -nicktoons

Seems like for the past hour I haven't been able to play RS. I've tried 5 times to play on internet explorer, and I've gotten a message saying "IE is restarting." This has happened each time I've tried. Then I tried Firefox. The game window just disappears after a minute or so of play. This has never happened to me before. Fixes? Experiences? PROFIT!? P.S. Not sure if this is the right forum for this.

:shock:

Yeahz. The Mayans only died before 2012 to avoid it(and the beast called Chuck Norris) Lol, that was the funniest thing I've saw on TIF in a while. Everyone is being so hostile and flamey lately. TIF must be on it's period. I guess that also explains the recent raids.

Though I do love mah cheap violence, you have to admit that the remote scene was a little... well, it shows what Hannake(sp?) as trying to do, but I just don't think it's a good idea for a theatrical release when you cut out a huge demographic. So a movie requiring a little thought as to director motives and such cuts out a large demographic? I think that says more about the demographic itself than the movie. Now you're assuming I don't like thought in movies? It's one thing to have a deeper meaning, but DELIBERATELY LEAVING OUT THE ENTERTAINMENT? It's like going to a comedy show but they forgot the jokes. This isn't just trying to appeal to a different audience, Hanneke(sp????) has even said that he wants to go against what the viewer wants. So entertainment is just a cookie-cutter happy ending now? Really? I mean, you still got to see the guy get blown away if that's what you were looking so hard for, but good guys winning is the only thing that counts for you to be entertained? And no, I didn't assume you dislike thought in movies. Did I say you did? No, stop putting words in my metaphorical mouth. But you seem to think victory for evil and that slap in the face, making the audience think about wtf just happened alienates a large demographic. I'm saying that if needing to think makes people shy away, that says a little something about what kind of society we have now. I also want to see this movie now. Why? Because it sounds like something good and thought-provoking as to why everything needs to turn out well. You should see it, it's a good movie up until the remote scene, but I never said I wanted the good guys to win, just I wanted to see SOME suffering on the part of the antagonists. And your mouth is anything but metaphorical. I've seen what goes on in there. I have to concede to you though, the director was creative in that. Frustrating as it was. And anti-climactic. On second thought, I might kill him tonight.

Allow me to break my promise not to respond to you for this. thers this famly, who gos to there vacation house. and these two guys r liek "were guna kill u" and the famlyz liek "no!" and there liek "too bad" so teh gaiz killz teh kid and the huzbnd, and der liek "lol" and teh wife if liek "ohnoes!" and den she's liek "dai!" and teh guy get shot, but den he dusnt, and im liek "wtf" That about sums it up.

I've been trying to find a review that sums up how I've described this movie, but it seems like every review is either all praise or all scorn.

That doesn't mean that you and Adio aren't being arses about it. That's exactly the point. The director gave you what you wanted, then reversed the situation, leaving you frustrated. Did you read the link I posted before? Nadril I don't mind so much, because of all the time I've just wanted to hug his epicness and because he actually took part in the discussion. Intriguing, I realize what the director was trying to do, but isn't feeling frustrated a bad thing? The movie was a fun ride, but in the end it just seems like it wasn't worth the 2 hours.

I was debating with myself checking this show out, is it kind of like that Dogfight show on History?

AGAIN with these damn insults, yet how am I an idiot? I already said that I'm not just talking about the ending, the whole movie was just painful to watch. It doesn't try to make you think, it's just mind rape. Chronological order of my opinion. 1. Egg scene - This has some potential :) 2. A while of talking - Some alright dialogue, this writer is pretty creative :D 3. Guy gets shot - Whole movie was worth it just for that! :thumbsup: 4. Remote - Thats a little dissapointing :thumbdown: Actually, responding to you made me realize that I liked the movie more than I said. It was decent leading up the the remote scene, but after that it just seemed like it was alot of anticipation for nothing :|

Again, nothing but insults. Come back when you feel you can contribute to the discussion. Until then, I will not respond to your posts here.

Way to post, not troll, make an on topic post, and yet contribute nothing. I don't really get what the director was smoking, movies are for entertainment. This would have been cool as a cheap independent film to be shown ONLY at film festivals and basic cable, but not a theatrical release where you actually EXPECT to be entertained. P.S. I think it's a sign of a bad horror/thriller when you watch the trailer before it comes out and until you see it believe it's a comedy with a bit of dark humor. Just sayin'. [yt]Ec-70W_K77U[/yt] i could've just called you an idiot, but i thought everyone already knew that. btw, i technically wrote some of that wiki page ages ago, so nice going - you did hear from me. Insults insults insults. NOW you're trolling =D> If you don't want to say something ON the forum, then go away. waah waah i cant understand this movie even though its explicitly stated in a way that even a small child can understand it. mommy hold me! how about u stop watching movies altogether, i think they are a bit too perplexing for you. 1. I like capital letters, they make me feel all warm and fuzzy inside. 2. AGAIN with the insults. You've yet to do anything but post a link and insult me. Way to help the thread along :roll: 3. We were over this argument. 4. Why are you getting so upset about this? @ Intriguing, I'm not just talking about the ending, I'm talking about the whole damn movie. There really is no thought here. Couple of guys come to a house, beat the [cabbage] out of the family, talk to them for an hour, then kill them. Sounds like a Blockbuster hit. They only got back HALF of the cost to make this movie, and after seeing it I undertsand why. The annoying thing is, with the eggs scene in the beginning, it actually looked like it could be a good movie. That was really the one scene I liked. Still, if you want to try watching it for yourself it's atleast worth a rental, or if you're lucky catch it on a movie channel. @ Nom - Eh, it would have been nice to see some justice done to atleast one of them. I didn't really mind the lack of violence, but it's too one-sided.

Though I do love mah cheap violence, you have to admit that the remote scene was a little... well, it shows what Hannake(sp?) as trying to do, but I just don't think it's a good idea for a theatrical release when you cut out a huge demographic. So a movie requiring a little thought as to director motives and such cuts out a large demographic? I think that says more about the demographic itself than the movie. Now you're assuming I don't like thought in movies? It's one thing to have a deeper meaning, but DELIBERATELY LEAVING OUT THE ENTERTAINMENT? It's like going to a comedy show but they forgot the jokes. This isn't just trying to appeal to a different audience, Hanneke(sp????) has even said that he wants to go against what the viewer wants.

"You nimbly climb up the bucket rope, emerging into Pollnivneach's bustling square." :roll:

Of course it will. Theres only one reason this is going on and thats because anti-wii fanboys wont admit to being jealous its better than their console overall. Way to make fun of fanboys only to immediately make a fanboy statement yourself.

Not sure if it was staged or not but... [yt]81lGAf9Z8z0[/yt]

Um, can you think of a reason for movies besides entertainment, and a small minority of educational films? None really, unless you just want to torture your friends. Profit. Though really, not all movies are aimed to appease you. If they were aimed to appease teenaged males, there'd be less High School Musical and such, and more pointless violence, swearing and nudity. Yes, all movies are designed for entertainment purposes, however they are not all geared towards the same type of person. You have a point there, but you'd think they'd aim for the larger demographic. P.S. Sorry about my last post on this thread, I just read it and it kinda sounded like I was insulting you :?