Bonez899
Members-
Posts
1463 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
19
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Bonez899
-
My, wet, friend was intrigued by this idea and requested I respond with this meme.[image]http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/034/999/1de.gif[/image] in a total fluke I stumbled across your reddit account lolI mean, when I don't change my username across boards thats on me.
-
Just went out to a bar and got proper drunk for the first time since I turned 19. Pretty decent time and I still can't understand why you guys send [bleep]ed up messages when drunk. I'm typing sloppily but I notice my mistakes and correct them still. Drunk TIFing is best TIFing.
-
Did you make sure to add effects when you were advertising for a girlfriend.
-
But you guys always give blanket advice and my situation is different somehow where neither of those statements are true. ~99% of replies.
-
It's really hard for some people to want to subsidize others, especially when they're already living pay check to pay check. If you're in the working class and you can barely afford private health insurance, you probably aren't too eager to pay extra to cover your coworker's healthcare. Ideally, there wouldn't be a huge increase (or an increase at all) in taxes for people who can't afford it, but that's a problem that the millionaires in Washington don't want to solve. Realistically though, that person no longer has to pay for private health insurance at that bracket because the increase in taxes they are paying would cover as much or more than the private insurance they are currently paying for.
-
That's why it's "my perfect world" idea, I realise that it I'd nearly impossible. However, in the case of somebody like the Charleston Shooter I think its pretty obvious where the guilt or innocence lies based on his own actions and statements.
-
That's where the effciency comes in. Currently it costs more due to the multiple, multiple trials and appeals to try and ensure the person isn't innocent of the crime possibly taking years and a boat load of extra money. My theoretical system which really only works in a perfect world has the original trial to establish guilt/sentencing and only one more after a multiple life sentence is handed down to decide execution or not. Additionally, after the second trial execution would be within a timely manner, no more than a month and preferably days to 2 weeks.
-
I don't know, personally I'm for the death penalty but only from an economic standpoint and if it can be carried out efficiently. For example, with a person like the Charleston shooter who is clearly guilty and even admits it himself why shouldn't he receive the death sentence? The alternative option is that we, speaking generally for the tax paying people, bear the burden of supporting this man through his life and paying for all of his meals, medical visits, clothing, etc... He honestly has no chance at parole and would have received a sentence which would keep him in jail for the remainder of his living days anyway, so why prolong the cost? That being said I feel like it should almost be more of a clause that can be provoked rather than a sentence to seek. Try the person for whatever crime they have committed, once it becomes clear beyond any shred of doubt - in this instance the accused's own admittance of guilt, especially with no remorse - that he was aware of his actions and that he will spend the remainder of his days in some form of incarceration, then the crown or another party could start a process to have him sentenced to death. I don't want innocent people, or people who truly regret their crime and may have another chance at life to die but even a jail sentence does nothing to a man who considers his actions right and won't take the time in jail to reflect on his crime or reform himself.
-
Start a Miss Hottie 2017 with the intention of finishing the competition.
-
I'm a day away from making alt accounts just to finish this tricofinal.
