muggiwhplar

Nope I hate them :P

John Petrucci and John Myung practiced 6 hrs a day in college - though that's difficult unless you're majoring in music To the guy above, yeah ultimate-guitar is great :D

Read the FAQ

I updated all of the rapidshare links

Wonder how many people here are copying down ideas for scamming :-k

That'd be ironic if it was a J-Mod's noob account just messing with you :P

I'm like that every morning :?

I go brain-dead and waste lots of time activating Lunar spells because I forget the seal and such. P.S. You remind me of Leesters

It is legal

I don't think many people can say, "Oh well. It's just pixels" after they realize that the pixels they just lost represent the hours, days, weeks, months, or years of their life they spent earning them.

I can quit anytime, I've already quit eight times :D :uhh:

Bad guide, sorry. You need to actually go PK'ing and Staking so you can explain what to do, not what to bring. All you say is to cast a spell. There is much more to staking than that, same goes for PK'ing.

These general p2p topics are really starting to go downhill.. Before the wanna-be mods report my post - the ugliest item's the rat-catching pole thing

RS used to be based on PK'ing :roll: I think the main reason they are doing this is to prevent a form of drop trading where one player kills another to get an item that they haven't earned. I'm not saying that the current system is perfect, but it would be even worse if a lower level pure with level 94 mage could barrage someone and get barrows gloves and a fire cape. Sounds fair to me as long as they cannot wear it until they complete RFD/Fight Caves

Why would a non-PK'er wear a fighter torso? It's dumb how all these better pieces of equipment have been introduced, encouraging PK'ing with untradable items. It'd be nice, like someone above said before, if the untradables were tradable but unweildable without a requirement. People could "buy back" the items you PK'd from them and you'd actually get something out of it. Because it gives a strength bonus :-k That's the only reason someone would wear it #-o I've quit pking (since I've had rather... evil experiences in the wildy) so it really doesn't affect me... and same with a lot of other people too. I meant in the wilderness

Why would a non-PK'er wear a fighter torso? It's dumb how all these better pieces of equipment have been introduced, encouraging PK'ing with untradable items. It'd be nice, like someone above said before, if the untradables were tradable but unweildable without a requirement. People could "buy back" the items you PK'd from them and you'd actually get something out of it.

Hey Ovu I'd post on the topic if my membership wasn't expired atm

It still seems as though all your comparisons are too vague - plus the TzHaar weapons (disc, knife, spear, etc) look like any other kind of disc, knife, or spear. You could compare the weapon similarities to any kind of weapon of the same class.

The wildy continues to be destroyed.. If your opponent in the wild is wearing it and gets killed, they can run back and pick it up. I imagine that pretty soon, the only non-retrievable items PK'ers will be using will be their food and pots :roll:

As far as I understand it, this FAQ page hasn't been updated in several years. This turn of events only happened recently, but why is everyone so quick to ignore the fine print of their contract that they implicitly signed with Jagex? (And yes, you did sign a contract with them when you created an account with them.) I'm sorry Makoto, but you misunderstand what a browser like SS is. It absolutely doesn't "reverse-engineer, decompile or modify the Game client software." It is not "a modified/customised version of the client software." It does not "create or provide any other means by which the Game may be played by others" and it is not "replacement or modified client/server software" or "server emulator" software. It accesses the game exactly the same way as any other browser like IE or Firefox does. That is why it has been legal all along. The "grey" areas had to do advertising and adding unfair advantages. While the software itself did not disable advertising, it did allow the user to do so themselves which breaks the rules. So, even though the software didn't break the rules, it "encouraged" users to do so. It is arguable whether the "world switcher" feature gave users an unfair advantage. The creator of SS always argued that it didn't because you couldn't use the software to switch worlds faster (in crowded world situations, it is actually slower). But, it did keep you from having to get carpal tunnel syndrome from repeated clicking on the full world. This can be argued as giving an advantage because many players would not bother to try to get into the world if they had to continuously click over and over again. And also, if you couldn't get into the new world, you weren't logged out of the old one, so you wouldn't have to log back into it. That could also be considered an advantage. But, by bookmarking the world in IE, you get the same advantages, so this is all very debatable. The fair trade laws of most countries (and internationally) abhor companies restricting third parties from creating products based on their existing product. It's a way of trying to "corner the market." This would be like GM saying that you can only use GM air cleaners in their cars. Lexmark lost in court when they tried to void people's warranties for using third party toner cartridges. I think Jagex comes very close to committing the same error when they try to say which browser can or can't be used with their product. But, the "newest" version of Rule 7 brings them back into better compliance with the intent of widely recognized fair trade laws, in my humble opinion. Thanks for explaining that. BBC tried to argue the same point as Mokoto did earlier. SS wins again :P

:P

Show me proof. I highly doubt thats the reason to the rule change. Proof:

by others so you mean ss or rs... cause that is where the problem lies If SS is not an advantage then the new rule should not have caused the spam and riots that it did. Having things easier is an advantage, whether you want to admit that or not. :roll: The reason they updated the rules was because people were getting scammed in the IRC client add-on of SS, not because of SS's "advantages." You have as much of a right as everybody else does to use the "advantage," you just choose not to.

Because they don't know anything about SS

I have a ton of dagannoth armor which needs to be sold but nobody buys it (rock-shell and skeletal)