muggiwhplar

Required levels, protection payments, GE price, and examine info: Level 76: prickly pear (15 jangerberries) - 3k gp A prickly pear seed - plant in a cactus patch. Harvesting this plant will grant experience in defence. Level 77: barberry bush (15 hammerstone hops) - 3k gp A barberry bush seed - plant in a bush patch. Level 78: reeds (15 Asgarnian hops) - 750 gp A reed seed - plant in a hops patch. Level 80: snape grass (15 dwellberries) - 450 gp A snape grass seed - plant in an allotment. Level 86: potato cactus (10 watermelons) - 5k gp A potato cactus seed - plant in a cactus patch. Level 87: sunchoke (15 Yanillian hops) - 600 gp A sunchoke seed - plant in an allotment. Harvesting this plant will grant experience in strength. Level 88: butterfly flower - 2k gp A butterfly flower seed - plant in a flower patch. Level 93: fly trap (15 cadava berries) - 800 gp Fly trap seed - plant in an allotment. Level 95: grapevines (15 Krandorian hops) - 6k gp A grapevine seed - plant in a hops patch. Level 96: wishing well bush (15 wildblood hops) - 20k gp A wishing well bush seed - plant in a bush patch. New potions are all level 93 herblore. Wine of Sara and Guthix are both 3k each.

The official wiki hasn't been updated to include the changes

I wish you'd respond to Hedge's arguments and elaborate on your own position. But with that said, I'm also curious as to how much experience Hedge actually has with old school PK'ing :D haha

walk from tomb to tomb, saving all your run energy for the catacombs

fun is subjective. I don't think anybody here can answer your question better than you can.

Simply put: because efficiency isn't that important, especially if you're a negative person. Thanks for sharing your PERSONAL opinion. Well, he was asking people to explain their PERSONAL opinions regarding a PERSONAL question, so I'm not really sure what you're getting at here. You're welcome, I guess??

Right. A reason why we don't discuss this is because it may come across as a slap in the face to the victim. But I'd rather help prevent such horrible things from happening in the future than avoid hurting someone's feelings. The ends justify the means. Personally, I think it's best to always accept responsibility for everything that happens to you-- good or bad. Sometimes it makes bad things worse, but ultimately it allows you to learn and reflect on experiences and hopefully achieve more desired outcomes in the future. It's not a very "considerate" way to manage your problems, but hey, reality isn't very considerate either; especially if you don't bother to change the way you deal with the things it throws at you :P

Simply put: because efficiency isn't that important, especially if you're a negative person.

When it comes to accountability/responsibility/blame/fault/etc... you need to look at what events led to something happening. But when you do that, you'll find that it's not as black and white as just one person causing something to happen. It usually involves MANY people. Think of the butterfly effect from sci fi stuff. Since the chain of events is long and blurry, you need to examine the closest events to the final occurrence, as well as people's INTENT, in addition to their BEHAVIOR. For example, you could argue that if a rapists' parents had never met, he'd never have been born, and there would have never been a rape. But that'd be silly because not only were those parents so distantly related to the event, they also didn't intend on having a child and raising him to be a rapist (I hope). Therefore it'd be a waste of energy to try to bring them into this. Not much good would come from saying, "remember parents-- if you choose to have a child, there's a chance he'll become a rapist and therefore you should definitely reconsider!" Things get blurrier when you get closer to the event itself. If you look at a girl who, instead of having just one or two drinks, decides to have five or six. Things get blurrier if she was peer pressured into having more drinks or if someone messed with her drinks, rather than her intentionally choosing to continue drinking. Things get blurrier if her friends ditch her instead of her abandoning her friends to go talk to the rapist. But ultimately, the final link in the chain of events is the rapist himself. Theoretically, he intended to rape her and was the primary determinant in the outcome. So if you're going to "blame" anyone, it would go to him. But just because he's to blame doesn't mean that the girl should be treated as someone who was 100% innocent. When I say innocent, again, I'm talking about her decisions which led to that outcome; not whether or not she "deserved" it. The reason it's important to consider the girl as at the very least somewhat responsible for this happening is so she, as well as her friends and society as a whole, can learn, grow, and adapt to mitigate this issue in the future. If people never accept the fact that drinking irresponsibly and making unsafe decisions (especially while intoxicated) can lead to very bad outcomes, then how can we expect those outcomes to become less frequent? Instead, we listen to that voice inside our minds which counsels fear and irrationality and we refuse to acknowledge the victim's role in this unfortunate chain of events. When you hear about rape in the media, the focus is almost always on the rapist and not the victim, with regards to their "participation" leading up to the event. We hear people saying, "Remember men! Control yourselves! I know you all want to go rape all day, but that's a no-no!" We rarely hear people saying, "Remember to drink responsibly and make smart choices so you don't end up like this person!" Hope that makes sense. >_>

Again, it sounds simple in theory, but it's really not. PvP requires more skill than any form of PvM could ever hope to achieve. Monsters are extremely predictable opponents. Other players, not so much. It's not that it's too hard/complex, it's that it's just not fun lol. Not to sound rude, but I'm still a little bit skeptical of your "credentials" when it comes to old school PvP criticism :P

I'm not sure if that would make rape any less serious. Huh?

Considering it's not exactly possible or ethical to include consequences for false rape accusations, I wonder what effects would occur if slut shaming no longer existed.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/12/false-reports-outpace-sex-assaults-in-the-military/

Then you have a whole different group complaining about "rapierscape". That's only a problem if one combat style is by far superior to the other two.

For starters, go read How to Stop Worrying and Start Living by Dale Carnegie.

Trouble Brewing was awesome while it lasted

I'd prioritize range attack. You could wear a monk top and fury and still have a decent pray bonus. If you cant afford a robin, use a god mitre

Shilo village quest dungeon and bandits in the bar

I'm going to reply to your massive irrational assumption with another irrational assumption... Wanna know how I know you have little-to-no experience with PK'ing? :lol:

No need to get snarky, Ginger :P

Loads of people have done it to be famous for a day or sometimes by accident and each time someone makes a big deal out of it. That sounds awesome. I'm totally doing that and then posting about it here.

Nice vid, though it isn't very realistic to get those XP rates whilst being AFK :P

Agree completely. @constrictor: of course it is. In fact I know of a guy who had something similar happen to him (he was passed out drunk and woke up to a woman on top of him...not sure of the gory details, but anyway). was she hot???

Best to just avoid one night stands and drunk hookups altogether IMO.

More like, should a guy be allowed to equip his beer goggles, bang a fat chick, and then accuse her of rape the next morning :P