Sy_Accursed

You really need to ask if a pot that has a 1 in 3 chance of doubling the number of herbs you get from a patch is worthwhile? That's like asking if its worth doing overtime at work that pays triple pay.

Same here. Didn't get a 2nd mask though, even though I caught the godly ones. I guess that's just one-at-a-time reward. Would make sense since the mask reward can reward only 1 item and therefore a simple do they have mask? yes > don;t give mask check can be applied. Where as the body pieces is given "randomly" and has two possible rewards; though tbf if jagex weren't darn lazy sometimes they could of easily put a check in so it checks if you have top and/or legs having 1 gives the other have both gives neither.

There are many animals native to all thoose areas who easily survive. A human or even group of humans however would quite easily die if they did have specific expertise or sheer luck to avoid the predators n find a way out.

I agree, but you're ignoring intelligence as a natural factor in survival. Since intelligence is a natural factor in survival, it should be included. As we used our intelligence rather than our physical assets to survive, what our intelligence created should be allowed. Intelligence is a factor but it is not your intelligence leading to your survival if you are using items created by others. Heck even with all the tech in the world if you personally were to be plonked down in the middle of nowhere in the sahara or the amazon or the african wilderness you would undoubtedly die despite the tech and intelligence. Unless you happen to be a survival specialist and even then you are not beating nature you are relying upon it; assuming of course you don;t get killed by an predator while you sleep or run out of tech to fend them off.

We're at the top of the food chain, our technology is far more advanced than that of any other living organism, and we have the ability to [bleep] up the world on such a great magnitude. Sounds an awful lot like we have overthrown nature - for the time being at least, because you are right about the ultimate entropy thing. At the time being, humans hold the largest influence on the world. Whether it was deserved or not is another story. And also, no matter how efficient or well-planned-out we are, we're still all going to die. Of course we could elongate our stay, but you can't really blame humans for their inevitable demise. Taking an opportunity and working with it however you possibly can is a key element of humanity, and when possibility doesn't allow it, nature has taken its title back. We're not there yet. Right now we're alive and kicking. While the point us being top may be true it has huge flaws. We msot definitely do not have control over nature that is why every year natural disasters kill so many people. I mean for all our technology we cant stop or even that accurately predict volcanoes, tornadoes, wild fire, earthquakes, tsunami etc. Equally human arguably are not the top of the food chain, strip us back to JUST humans without all our technology and most predators would easily best us, heck heaps of predators can easily best us even with our tech. Which is why we developed our technology: because we needed it to survive. Saying that humans wouldn't be at the top of the food chain is unfair. Strip other animals of their claws and teeth, then compare. Not really. Claws and teeth are a part of the animal, we have claws and teeth too (well claws of sorts). We only best animals through un-natural means. The food chain is about the natural order, in the natural order many animals easily beat humans away from the top of the food chain.

We're at the top of the food chain, our technology is far more advanced than that of any other living organism, and we have the ability to [bleep] up the world on such a great magnitude. Sounds an awful lot like we have overthrown nature - for the time being at least, because you are right about the ultimate entropy thing. At the time being, humans hold the largest influence on the world. Whether it was deserved or not is another story. And also, no matter how efficient or well-planned-out we are, we're still all going to die. Of course we could elongate our stay, but you can't really blame humans for their inevitable demise. Taking an opportunity and working with it however you possibly can is a key element of humanity, and when possibility doesn't allow it, nature has taken its title back. We're not there yet. Right now we're alive and kicking. While the point us being top may be true it has huge flaws. We msot definitely do not have control over nature that is why every year natural disasters kill so many people. I mean for all our technology we cant stop or even that accurately predict volcanoes, tornadoes, wild fire, earthquakes, tsunami etc. Equally human arguably are not the top of the food chain, strip us back to JUST humans without all our technology and most predators would easily best us, heck heaps of predators can easily best us even with our tech.

Ardy cloak 3 and 4 work anywhere. But as for stacking ardy wont stack with ham robes, since ham robes have their own cape so you cant wear the full ham robes AND ardy cape. Same goes for gloves of silence as ham robes have gloves.

Old News is Old. He was added the better part of a year ago now.

You have to catch 1 of each.

I'm fairly certain it wont let you pick pocket sandy until the point you are told you need too; if memory serves me correctly. Hence two trips.

No once you have it you don;t lose it. But you have to attract and catch 1 of every jadinko in a single week to obtain it. Not some 1 week and some another.

I'd be careful before you jump on that bandwagon and double check books. I considered doing that as my shelf space is running dry of about 30 books i can get like 3 as ebooks.

No. Normal clothe reward is for catching 1 of each jad in that week (excluding god jads) The mask is reward for catching ALL jads in the week including the god ones. Come midnight tuesday in GMT it resets and you will have to catch them all if you want the mask.

I assume that was directed at me. While that maybe true I don't generally find a need to google light bulbs; nor doe it alter the fact that in the uk a fluorescent bulb refers to the old style fluorescent tube bulbs and not to energy saving bulbs.

why would you want to swap them for florescent bulbs? Fluorescent just has tht nasty yellow glare to it. Surely you mean energy saving bulbs? Edit: Judging by that link above I get them impression American's call energy saving bulbs fluorescent bulbs.

I disagree. That only happens if the staff allows it to happen. But if the staff were to get a firm grip and show that they want to have fun, but also were there to keep everyone friendly I think the forum could succeed and do very well. I've seen alot of lit communitys go that way regardless of staff intervention; because just being scolded by a staff member wont stop a literature snob from being such.

Probably not because you'd end up with an elitist group who flame, troll and generally decry people who enjoy or wish to speak off any book they don;t deem to be literature given enough time. I mean I can see the different value of books and some are far more literature than others; but that doesn't mean other books aren't nice to talk about and enjoy. I mean for example Twilight and Harry Potter in literary terms are absolutely appallingly written and contribute little to the great swathes of literature out there. But they are still good books because the story is engaging and they are enjoyable and can be discussed.

Sorry to burst your bubble but there are 8 greegrees to be had not 5. 2 gorilla 2 ninja 2 zombie 1 karamja monkey 1 blue faced gorilla via zombie imps

Sorry but what planet do you live on? Runes are nowhere near that big as you can see in the rune-crafting animation. Granted they r bigger on the floor, but must items are enalrged or shrunken to fit onto 1 floor tile and have a decent "clickable area"

I think its personal taste etc. Personally I can't stand them; but I find it difficult to read alot of text on a screen. Like if we get assigned an essay extract to read and its given via the uni website I have to print it.

How do you figure this? The hunter juju specifically says for attracting more uncommon jads. Hunter pot is the only one you can use on plants. KB clearly sates "God jadinkos will only be attracted by those under the influence of juju hunter potions."

Have you talked to Dr Mambo at the entracne before starting? And equally talked to the A something guy hu gives quick tutorial by the farming patches?

You dont have the right combinations then. If its a correct combination they jads will appear as soon as u plant the last plant regardless of growth stages. The only time it dont work is if a plant is diseased or dead.

or the draconic jads since they r the ones tht give only herb seeds...

No they dont need to be fully grown only planted and alive. It seems you are missing key attractors. Camo requires: Any vine blossom WITH juju potion applied lergberry bush standing stones. You seem to have not bothered with vine or juju according to what you said. Cannibal also requires juju