Jump to content

Tetsuya

Members
  • Posts

    465
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Tetsuya

  1. Hahahaha, no. Once again...Who becomes a member for bank space? Who'd quit P2P if F2P got bank space? How many less new members would there be if F2P got more bank space? Either you fail, or you're now a supporter. -.- Maybe kind of stubborn and stupid. Exactly. =D>
  2. Not everyone is going to pay 1 million for a house. But if you want a castle-ish house, don't expect to have it for free. not even just a bigger house. Just set your priorities, if the game is not important enough for you to pay 5 bucks a month, then why would it be important enough for you to need more bankspace? A game and a house are completely different. :shock:
  3. lol that is soo invalid, we pay for updates. plus, i never felt the need for more bankspace when i was a f2p, and now, i sometime need to do a big cleaning. It was perfectly valid. Anyways, I never came close to using all my members bank. But when I was f2p I ran out of space all the time.
  4. And who wants to tell Un1kmage that members got bank space updates quite a few times since f2p last got one?
  5. Uh...no you can't. :roll: At least not by throwing away other essential items.
  6. Well. I have been a member(more than 2-3 months btw). And Making some f2p robes will not f up the economic system. Especially if the robes were a reward for a quest. Mystic robes weren't in f2p in the first place. So, there's nothing to really skyrocket. But now that I think about it. Making mystic f2p won't work well anyways. I was thinking of having a 3 piece set that has close to the same stats at 3 of the ghost robe pieces, but without the translucent effect. That would be a perfect new robe set for f2p. But this topic is about making f2p robes. "just get members" is not a acceptable answer. "Just getting members" won't change a thing for f2p balance. :wall:
  7. If they quit because of lack of things to do in f2p it's because they didn't pay for membership. Face it, *most* people that don't pay for a membership within the first (year and a half at most, 9 months at least) probaly are never going to get it. I said most because there is the rare example of the kid having his parrent let him pay for the game now, however, thats a minority not a majority of the players. Updates (for f2p) would not bring in more members and, thus, is a complete waste of resources. It would give them a better taste of what members has to offer. Since the pay version came out a number of years ago it's been constantly been getting more than f2p week by week. Looking at it today, f2p has been pretty much left in the dust. If it keeps going this way, people will lose interest in f2p and leave RS altogether. So, no. f2p updates are not a waste of resources.
  8. Well, As a member. And one of the biggest supporters of this idea. Adding more f2p bank space benefits the game as a whole. Besides, you haven't put up any decent argument that I haven't debunked before in this topic so I'm not even going to bother :notalk:. But calling poeple whiners isn't going to help anyways.
  9. Old timer. Even though my skills don't really look it.
  10. I think f2p should get updates. f2p is an important part of RS.
  11. Another great idea for fixing this problem. I definitely support. :thumbsup:
  12. Let me ask you...Who becomes a member for the bank space? Who would quit P2P if F2P got more bank space? O O o me! Why? Members has a hell of a lot more to offer than just a month of more bank space. Anyways, I wouldn't quit. I actually would play members more if they gave f2p more bank space.
  13. A Kyocera pay as you go phone. It does what it's supposed to.
  14. He missed 2, there are 6 f2p tiaras/talismans. There are poeple who use spells which require body runes. And theres many f2pers who have nature runes. And also quite a few who have cosmic runes.
  15. I agree. f2p should get skill capes. But maybe with downgraded emotes.
  16. I totally support this idea. :thumbsup: Although I also think it shouldn't be limited to holidays.
  17. Even better, make a quest specifically for unlocking these robes, instead of combining with Dragon Slayer. :) ... Mages would have an awful time at Dragon Slayer, so why not give them a quest tailored for them instead? Obviously, I don't mean make it easy. Make it as hard as it would be for a Warrior/Ranger would have in Dragon Slayer, but not harder. In short, the difficulty of a Warrior/Ranger in Dragon Slayer would be equal to the difficulty level of the Mage-specific Quest for Mages to unlock the new robes. Anyone get what I am saying here? :-s ~Mr. Devnull Sounds like an awesome idea. Kinda like the lunar robe quest. :thumbsup: No, you haven't addressed my points yet. Your points were invalid to the idea. You were just trying to start another f2p vs p2p argument. Lets just avoid that. :-$
  18. 1. How many people play approx. i was on silvermoon (very high pop.) and i rarely saw anyone. It depends on where you are. Some zones have less people in them than others. 2. is there a way to play without sitting down for 2hrs + at a time? Sure, as long as you don't plan on doing any instances or raids. 3. How long does 60 take? Took me about 3 months when I played. 4. when is burning crusade coming out? or did it already? In a couple days I think.
  19. Oh, believe me. It is. Getting a second santa hat and blue mask is nearly impossible. :wall:
  20. I'm a member and I strongly think F2P needs more bank space. Ive been supporting another thread on the suggestion forums for quite a while. It has like 500 supporters now. :thumbsup: If you also want to support, there's a link at the bottom of my sig.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.