eliisgood

That is a pretty good idea and explained more in depth than most others; would be good if it was implimented.

please, do not revive dead posts, now this will probably be locked; this has been dead for quite awhile now. Also: everyone else, please don't post anything here....I would rather this thread not be locked, and normally when someone revives a dead thread, there are ten to fifteen comments saying how they shouldn't of revived the post :shock: Thank you! eliisgood

I don't really see why you would halve the exp....n one would really use it then :?

the sad thing is.....they may impliment something like this one day :(

Here is one of the main flaws with your plan: you said that this would be nice if you wanted to play alone; this would destroy the whole infrastructure of the game. For example: "oh, I want to make some quick money so I think that I will go mine coal in my own little world, then I will log back onto the multi-player part of the game and sell all of it....no competition for me! :roll: )

yes, that would be very nice......I wonder why they don't do that? Perhaps they think that it wouldn't fit in with the "Pirate's Treasure" quest? :?

hmmm.....the picture isnot woring for me....maybe it is just my computer having problems :o

this would be a very, very good idea. However, the idea should be tweaked some: the random event should only come to people who type fast and do not make any differences in their typing....if you are really a human being and are typing that fast (which some people can), you will probably make at least two or three typos in a minute or so; this would protect people that really are extremely fast typers.

no....as with most suggestions that I see on this forum, it just makes life (and trading) way too easy.

well, it would be a good idea, although I think that the player who gets killed still drops one-fourth of the runes that they are carrying (whether they are in the boxes or not); this would prevent mages from "three iteming" in a new and strange way (especially if they were using the new Lava or Mist or whatever runes).

although it would be nice, it would make things too easy; people would sit on karajma all day and fish, cook fish, kill leser demons, and bank; repeat; very boring because it doesn't take a whole lot of moving around, and it makes things just a tad bit too easy.

no......it would make the game too easy (as did the "cook X" feature, that was annoying!) just light the logs on fire and get a fire-making level if you want to.....that is what I constantly do, and I am over level 50 in firemaking and woodcutting.

yes....this idea will be totally useless (unless you use runes other than nature runes, which would make it cheap and affordable to people who can't perform high alchemy.....but I still don't really like the idea)

wow........that was an odd sentence :? it would be a good idea if you had to pay more to put the spell into it; if you died, you wouldn't lose allof the runes you had been carrying, at least.

I think that he was trying to say that they should make runescape into a handheld game......horrible idea (if that was what you were saying).

a good idea, although it should definitely not give prayer exp.....the idea of it taking up 30 prayer points is kind of pointless, isn't it? I mean, if you teleport to a monastery and it takes up 30 prayer points....you can just pray at the alter and get them right back; therefore: I think that you should just have to have at least 30 prayer points when you teleport, but it should not take away any.

I have seen this idea suggested countless times before (although not lately, I dont know why though :?). I think that adding a description to yourself would be an okay idea, but people would majorly abuse it, and Jagex has now made it against their rules to say your real name or to tell which state you live in, so.....they would never allow it, although I personally think that it is an okay idea.

I would say that we really should not put more fish in the game; Jagex is making it too easy to get levels now! I know that everyone wants to get to level 99 fishing as fast as possible, but if everyone has 99 fishing, it upsets that balance of the game......updates like new fish to make it easier to level up hurts old players be making it so that the hours of work that they put in, the new player can gain the same amount of levels in half the time! DOing this would kind of be kind of like how the new fishing style of RS2 hurt all of the old fishermen of RS classic; it used to take hours to gain levels, not it takes about a forth of the time. I say no, do not add more fish in-between.....it makes the game too easy.

well, I suppose that this might work, although if it were implimented, it would make you (the PKer) a lot harder to kill, but it would also make it a lot harder to kill someone in the wilderness.

no.....this is a really bad idea; black is special because you can not make it; if you could, the price of black stuff would fall dramatically (not that it is exactly expensive now, but still...... *shrugs*)

this is definitely not true, otherwise there would be a lot more people with these hats on :lol:

those are ok stats, they could be improved, just odn't do any ranged training (as you probably already know); some more prayer would be nice because the protect prayers will last longer than they do now. Most of the fact if you are a good PKer or not is determined by your weapons at this point, so be sure that you use good weapons and the best spells that you can afford!

those are ok stats, they could be improved, just odn't do any ranged training (as you probably already know); some more prayer would be nice because the protect prayers will last longer than they do now. Most of the fact if you are a good PKer or not is determined by your weapons at this point, so be sure that you use good weapons and the best spells that you can afford!

no no no no no, this is not a good idea, besides.....you barely described the idea at all; how would it affect the f2p people? how would it affect the PKing triangle? If you told about this in the post, people might think more of your idea.

hmmmm....when I use firefox, I must select a different kind of Java.....I think that the one that I use is the Sun Java...and sometimes the unsigned applet works also; the default one never works on Firefox (at least for me it doesn't)