pault

BBC reported collapse of WTC7 early: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? ... cleId=4972

http://www.thepriceoftreason.net/ is pretty sick. So is bethehammer.net

Thanks for everything Kurt.

There has been no definitive investigation into what happened to WTC7.

The official version is crap. My tax dollars have paid for several multimillion dollars worth of investigation. Do you read? I don't have to hypothesize and I'd rather not. All I'm saying is: The official version of what happened to WTC7 is crap and it appears to have been demolished with explosives. This needs investigation.

I'm just not going to speculate about "Designing a way to bring down WTC7". Obviously it was brought down by something other than fire or structural damage from the North Tower. What was that something? It seems pretty clear it was explosives. How? Why? We need a new investigation into 9/11. It's not my job to figure these things out. As a citizen it's my tax dollars paying for the FEMA and NIST investigations, don't forget that. It's my duty to protest the government when I think it's screwing up, though, and it's sure screwing up right now.

It's not our job to wonder about things like this. It's obvious at this point that the government is lying to us. The major problem is apathy. http://summeroftruth.org/lihopmihopnohop.html

The collapse of WTC7 is something that the "True Believers" around here cannot respond to. In fact, even the government can't explain it. http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/

http://www.911research.com/wtc/evidence ... lapse2.mpg From: http://www.journalof911studies.com/volu ... llapse.pdf Also related to 9/11 truth: James Fetzer from Scholars for 9/11 Truth appeared on Hannity and Colmes (watch). Colmes accidentally asks him an open ended question, and Fetzer explains how Cheney knew the plane was coming in toward the pentagon and how there were orders not to shoot it down. Proof was in the testimony of Norman Mineta . The next day, Mineta was fired from the Bush Administration. This is not a coincidence.

Example?

The Bush Administration underestimated the ability of the 9/11 Commission to cover up the truth. Little tidbits do escape. And as for the "Steel/fires" issue, take a look at this video: http://www.911research.com/wtc/evidence ... lapse2.mpg Does this look like a building collapsing because of fire? Edit: And an "18 story gash" caused by debris which fell at 10:28 does not explain the sudden collapse of the building at 5:20 PM.

Why was Mineta fired?

Everything.

Meet Your Master on full volume. I'm not listening to any other music, ever.

Some ideas that may or may not help: Choose a theme for several poems and write them together. Use a thesaurus to find new words. Google image search and use pictures as a basis for poems. Change font color and style. Good luck.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08va1i6LYPc James Fetzer for 9/11 truth appears on Hannity and Colmes^. Colmes accidentally asks him an open ended question, and Fetzer explains how Cheney knew the plane was coming in toward the pentagon and how there were orders not to shoot it down. Proof was in the testimony of Norman Mineta. The next day, Mineta was fired from the Bush Administration.

http://yearzero.nin-thespiral.com/FLJoi ... layer.html

http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/creatures/index.html tiny

It's related to the US in many ways though. We may not have talking cameras, but we have the Patriot Act, we have the end of Habeus Corpus, an essential repeal of the Posse Comitatus Act, and many other subtle attacks on our freedom.

Steal Underpants! (google is your friend ;))

4.5) Bad image hosting!

These cameras and speakers are going to be used on a much wider scale in the UK soon. Many people (in the UK and the US) have realized that the War on Terrorism and the War on Drugs are wholly unnecesarry evils, so any signs of an encroaching police state are seen as efforts to control the population (in ways more insidious than "Terrorism" and the subservient media already has). What I mean by describing the War on Terrorism and the War on Drugs in this way is that these two vague concepts are self-defeating solutions to non-existent problems. Terrorism is a buzzword to describe amy violence which justifies the imperial actions of the US and the UK. http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? ... themeId=18 The War on drugs is a war on users of drugs (most of whom hurt nobody with their recreational activities) and the sellers of drugs (who would not be part of a dangerous criminal enterprise if drugs were legal). http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/lib ... sicfax.htm

Then it's obviously not photoshopped, it's on-the-fly generated. Way to reason things out. And Viktor's looks like an MSPaint job.

In the coming revolution we'll eat people like you first... -.- :roll: That's not the point. The point is that at some point you may not agree with a law and choose to break it. For example, you may take part in a political demonstration, or choose to cut through the backyard of a company, or walk on the grass, or whatever. And at that point you will reap the reward of your apathy, an omniscient police force that doesn't have to treat you like a human being.